Critics exhibited mixed reaction to the work of the individual creators involved in the different books of the "Fear Itself" crossover, praising the art in general, but generally panned the writing as "pedestrian, bordering on silly", and reported that the title failed to sell through at shops. Chad Nevett, reviewing the
Fear Itself: Book of the Skull for
Comic Book Resources, opined that it felt like a drawn-out issue of
Ed Brubaker's
Captain America, and a lead-in to the 2011 relaunch of that title, rather than an essential setup for "Fear Itself". Calling Brubaker's story and Scot Eaton's art "competent", Nevett characterized it as "a good comic, not great", "an entertaining superhero action comic" and "your pretty standard 'Red Skull crazy World War 2 scheme' plot with few surprises." Though he felt that Eaton's art was clear and the action shots energetic, he felt Eaton's line work was cluttered at times, his faces "bulging and scrunched at the same time" and in general, his work "generic". At
Newsarama,
David Pepose noted Brubaker's talent for mixing fun dialogue with action, but thought the book read "a little choppy". He described Scot Eaton's pencils as having "an exciting vibrancy", singling out his rendition of character close-ups, but felt that in light of Marvel and Matt Fraction's promotion of the miniseries, that the prologue was unnecessary. Danny Djeljosevic of
Comics Bulletin saw
Book of the Skull as Brubaker's embracing of the silliness of the Marvel Universe, and also questioned if readers would need the prologue to appreciate the crossover, saying that Captain America's presence in the story felt more like a marketing ploy than a natural aspect of it. Djeljosevic found the supervillain interaction to be fun, and wished that it had been given the focus of the book. Alex Evans of
Weekly Comic Book Review gave the book a
"B", thought, despite his aversion to prologue books, for Brubaker's scripting, the accurate tone of each of the characters, comparing the combination of Nazis and paranormal elements to the work of
Mike Mignola, as well as Eaton's "fantastic" art. Evans opined, however, that it did not function well as a prologue, because it did not inform him as to the nature of the upcoming storyline. Evan Narcisse, Graeme McMillan and Douglas Wolk of
Time magazine's Techland website found the book to be "tepid", and stated that it failed to provide exposition for new readers, or to inform or intrigue readers as to the upcoming storyline, which they felt was emblematic about Marvel's "insular" approach to big event storylines.
Core miniseries reviews at the end of
Fear Itself #1 (July 2011), one of the images for which the creative team of
Stuart Immonen,
Wade Von Grawbadger and
Laura Martin were universally praised. By contrast, the core miniseries' writing drew more varied reactions, with multiple reviewers citing a high standard set by the early issues that was not met by the latter ones. Doug Zawisza, reviewing the
Fear Itself miniseries for
Comic Book Resources, commended writer Matt Fraction for the first two issues, praising his establishment of the story and tying it into Marvel Universe history in the first issue, while still making it enjoyable for new readers. Zawisza was less impressed with issues 2 - 4. Though they enticed him to buy the tie-in books, which he normally does not do with crossovers, he felt the story's shift of locales, the lack of resolution to its setups, the depiction of action in "snippets" and the relegation of important plot events to tie-in books hurt the story. By issues 5 and 6, which Zawisza felt exhibited out-of-character dialogue, he felt the miniseries had failed to live up to the promise of the first issue, despite some powerful character-defining moments. Zawisza was more favorable towards
Stuart Immonen's art, calling it "incredible" and "gorgeous", and Immonen a "modern master" whose ability to convey a large amount of story in a small portion of a page Zawisza compared to that of
George Pérez. George Marston felt the second issue built an air of paranoia and panic with an effective and utilitarian staccato pace, and enjoyed the surprising choices for the Worthy, saying that the series' main strength is relying on multiple ideas and story beats to create "a collective reading experience that may change the landscape of the Marvel Universe, [which doesn't do so] at the expense of its own readability." Colin Bell felt the third issue was merely "passable", as it failed to depict the Worthy's actions in a consequential manner, and lacked gravitas until the end. Marston felt issue #4 exhibited more momentum and sweeping heroics, and contrasted Fraction's writing with
Brian Michael Bendis' tendency to build events slowly. Marston conceded that the story's major beats could be perceived for their shock value, but contrasted this with the "little moments" that he felt stood out. Newsarama's reviewers consistently gave high ratings to the entire art team, with Smith commenting, "It's Immonen who really shines", At
Comics Bulletin, a roundtable review of issue #1 by five reviews resulted in an average rating of 3.7 out of 5 bullets. The reviewers generally praised the writing and art, though Ray Tate, who expressed an aversion to large-scale "event" storylines, questioned the first issue's execution, and perceived out-of-character behavior on the part of Odin. Norse mythology fan Thom Young stated that certain elements did not resonate or ring true to him. Danny Djeljosevic gave issue #2 a rating of 3.5 bullets, again praising the tension-building of the story and the art. For issue #3, Shawn Hill rated it 3.5, stating that art and characterization justified continued patronage of the series, but that the plot did not, while Sam Salama Cohén exhibited an overall more positive reaction, with 4.5 bullets. Djeljosevic gave 4 bullets to issue #4, complimenting Fraction for hitting his stride as he scripted "the most technically daunting task in his comics career", and singling out the parallel scenes of Odin and the Serpent rallying their troops in particular. Like Doug Zawisza, Djeljosevic was impressed by Stuart Immonen's ability to effectively render different subjects, from sleepy seaside Canadian towns to superhero battles, and remarking, "Immonen is easily the most versatile artist in comics, who will surely go down as one of the greats with his striking layouts and dynamic, varied panel to panel storytelling. Immonen reminds me of the old-school Marvel Comics artists, who were capable of delivering strong, consistent work every month with little need for fill-ins." Jason Serafino of
Complex magazine, in reviewing issue #6, stated, "The Fear Itself series has stalled somewhat after a strong debut issue," but equivocated, "It's tough to ask for too much from a series that hinges on little more than some widescreen action and incredible art. Just sit back, relax, and enjoy the mayhem." Jesse Schedeen of
IGN rated the first two issues a "Great" 8.5 out of 10 and a "Good" 7.5, respectively, saying that the story and characterization were well-executed by Fraction, including the nuanced, weighty Norse dialogue. Schedeen also thought Immonen's wide, cinematic panels were "top-notch", and Laura Martin's colors "characteristically lush and beyond reproach", but thought Wade von Grawbadger's inks were thicker and slightly less precise than on his previous
New Avengers work. However, Schedeen rated three of the following four issues a "Good" or "Okay" 6.5, and the final issue an "Okay" 6.0, citing lack of context of the story's global events, poor characterization and dialogue, reliance on events relegated to tie-in books, use of too many of the final pages for epilogues and an overall sense that the series failed to surpass its origins as a Thor/Captain America crossover. Alex Evans of
Weekly Comic Book Review gave a
"B+" to three of the first four issues, saying that Fraction effected a sincere, topically relevant and emotionally authentic story rather than a marketing ploy or editorial shuffle. Evans felt the book utilized its scene-jumping structure to properly explore the expansive, global impact of the Worthy as a legitimate threat, and that both
Bucky's death and Loki's humorous dialogue were well-handled. However, Evans decried the too-straightforward treatment of Sin's setup, and the lack of Fraction's usual subtext in issue #3 (which he graded
"B-"). Evans and Dean Stell graded the next three issues
C+,
"C-" and
"D", expressing that, despite the exciting battles, the issues were marred by a transitional feel, redundant material covered in tie-ins, a "hideous"
deus ex machina use of Franklin Richards' massive but ill-defined powers, a ludicrous opening scene in issue #6, choppy storytelling, meaningless character deaths, and lack of closure. Stell called it a "crappy" series based on a "thin" concept that warranted neither seven issues nor the copious tie-in books. The reviewers thought the art and colors were vibrant and detailed, and Immonen the perfect choice for the series, though Stell thought it looked a bit rushed in issue #6, and not up to Immonen's usual standards in issue #7.
Tie-in book reviews Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave '''''Fear Itself: Sin's Past''''' #1 a "Mediocre" rating of 5 out 10, saying that the issues chosen for reprinting were not the ideal ones from which readers could learn about
the character, as the character's first appearances did not feature her disfigured, skull-like appearance, did little to flesh out her character and the modern and because the bold, modern coloring did not mesh with
Al Milgrom's soft pencils, whose detailing of
Rich Buckler's layouts issue #355 were inconsistent in quality to begin with. Chad Nevett and Ryan K. Lindsay of Comic Book Resources gave 4 out of 5 stars to issues 622, 624 and 625, and 3.5 stars to issues 623 and 626, seeing it as superior to the core miniseries. The reviewers praised the intelligence, structure and "cerebral" narrative of Gillen's of Thor and Loki's new relationship set against Asgardian politics, calling it a "glorious tale", and an improvement over his previous
Thor work. Also mentioned were Gillen's whimsical captions, "tight dialogue" and his ability to plant narrative seeds and follow through purposefully with winding plot twists. They also noted Braithwaite's "intricate", "amazing art" and Arreola's colors, and how this lent itself to depicting Loki's various moods.
Rich Johnston of
Bleeding Cool positively compared issue #623 to the
2011 Thor feature film, calling it the "perfect comic" for presenting Asgard in a "grandly poetic" light, "epic" and "beautiful". Johnston praised the book for the complexity in which it elevated Loki as a more impressive character than Thor. Reviewers at Comics Bulletin gave 4 out of 5 bullets to
Journey Into Mystery #622, 624 and 625, giving Kieron Gillen high marks for his storytelling, characterization, humor and satisfyingly brisk pace, and Doug Braithwaite for his "wondrously detailed" art. Jesse Schedeen of
IGN, who gave issue #623 a "Great" rating of 8.5 out of 10, also enjoyed Gillen's "refined and almost lyrical" dialogue, and the art, though he felt the colors needed some adjustment. Schedeen gave issue #627 a "Great" rating of 8.0 out of 10, saying that what was essentially a filler issue was elevated by the creative team's execution, and that Rich Elson's made an appropriate substitution for artist Doug Braithwaite, but that the lettering was too small and indistinct. Schedeen gave issue #630 an "Amazing" rating of 9 out of 10, calling Gillen's
Volstagg tale a "classic" and the series "Marvel's best ongoing book". He compared it to the "Wiz Kids" segment of the 2001
Simpsons episode "
Treehouse of Horror XII", and applauded its humor, emotion, the rendition of the different sides of Volstagg's personality, and the manner in which guest artist Rich Elson's refined, precise pencils addressed the previous problems Schedeen perceived in the series. The "Fear Itself" issues of
Journey Into Mystery have the highest score of any tie-in at Comic Book Roundup, with 8.6 out of 10. Alex Evans, reviewing
New Avengers #14 and 15 for Weekly Comic Review, graded them
"A-" and "B", calling the first issue the best since the series' first story arc, due to writer Brian Michael Bendis' intimate character work with
Mockingbird, and artist
Mike Deodato's ability to capture the most subtle nuances of emotion in facial expressions. Regarding the next issue, Evans thought that while it was not as compelling as the previous one, Bendis nonetheless fleshed out Squirrel Girl into a "fully realized, sympathetic character", disproving his initial expectations upon learning that it focused on Squirrel Girl. CBR's Greg McElhatton enjoyed
Nick Spencer's script for
Secret Avengers #13, in particular the lateral thinking McElhatton felt Spencer employed in seizing the opportunity to do a different take on "Fear Itself". Though he was impressed with the story's ability to stand on its own without requiring reading a different title, he did not care for its reliance on coincidence. McElhatton also enjoyed Scot Eaton's pencils, in particular his rendition of
Beast and of the fight scenes, but noted that
Adi Granov's cover to the book included a number of characters not in it. Alex Evans of Weekly Comic Book Review gave the issue a "B+", commending Spencer for keeping the story topical with a sense of anxiety that transcended the story's villains, and for his work with both the
Beast and Lenny's friendship and with
Ant-Man. Evans also called Scot Eaton's art "incredibly polished, detailed, and high budget", as seen in both the attack on Washington, DC and the character's reactions to it. Evans said the book fulfilled all the criteria for a good tie-in book, including a message that avoided being overly sentimental or silly. Ray Tate gave 5 out of 5 bullets to
Avengers Academy #15, but only three bullets to issue #16. Conceding he was disinterested in the crossover's core miniseries, he nonetheless liked
Christos Gage's exploration of
Tigra in
Academy #15, but thought issue #16 to be a "mixed bag", saying that while the creative team succeeded in making the
Veil story resonant, the drama of the Absorbing Man and Titania did not engage him, despite being technically good. Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave a
"B-" to issue #18, calling it a good opportunity for readers looking to read new characters, and as a someone whose first comic was
Secret Wars, Stell was delighted by the use of
Titania and
Absorbing Man, though he thought the story could have been told in one issue instead of three. He also thought the art was effective, but was not enamored of what he thought was an overly-highlighted coloring style. Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave of "Okay" rating of 6.5 out of 10 to issue #20, based on less than ideal scene transitions, bad pacing and
Tom Raney's "underwhelming" art, which he felt looked rushed in many pages. Schedeen felt the series overall suffered from lack of focus on the entire team. However, Schedeen would later list it as the twentieth best Avenger story ever told, claiming the series "has never been stronger than when it tied into the events of Fear Itself." Ray Tate of Comics Bulletin gave 2 out of 5 bullets to
Fear Itself: Youth in Revolt #1, attributing this to confusing plotting, implausible behavior on the part of bit characters and lack of independence from the core miniseries. However, he expressed enjoyment of Sean McKeever's characterization of the heroes, in particular Thor Girl, as well as Mike Norton and Veronica Gandini's art. Tate gave the next two issues 5 out of 5 bullets, however, again mentioning his enjoyment of Thor Girl and the art team's work in issue #2, and the Hardball story in issue #3. Jesse Schedeen at IGN gave the first two issues "Good" ratings of 7 and 7.5, impressed with how many characters McKeever was able to fit and properly define in the series, but unimpressed with how McKeever failed to make abstract fear concept palpable, or to distinguish the book from other tie-ins with similar concepts. Schedeen gave "Great" ratings of 8 out of 10 to the next two issues, for the gravitas in the books that the main miniseries lacked, in particular the brutal death scene, which he contrasted with to
Bucky's death scene in
Fear Itself #3, for how McKeever's handling of the heroes' internal conflict, and his development of
Gravity. Schedeen likened the depiction of the low point of the Initiative's crisis to the classic
Marvel Team-Up #41 (1975) in which
Spider-Man was trapped under tons of rubble. Schedeen consistently had kind words for Norton's "clean, expressive pencils". Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave a "B" and "B+" to the first two issues, pleased with McKeever's ability to write younger characters, in particular Thor Girl, Cloud 9 and Ultragirl, and utilizing B-list and C-list characters, which he felt added depth to the main series. Though he advised readers that it was not essential to the crossover, he enjoyed it more than the first two issues of the core miniseries. He felt the riots, however, marred the story, as he did not think them a believable reaction to "fear". He also said that Norton's art was a "recipe for success". Alex Evans, who reviewed
Invincible Iron Man #504 - 506 for Weekly Comic Book Review, gave the first two issues a "B+", and the third one a "B", lauding writer Matt Fraction for using Iron Man's haunting discovery of Mokk's victims to set a chilling tone and atmosphere of the crossover, reminding Evans of the
Minotaur in the
Cretan Labyrinth, while still maintaining the unique dynamic and relationship of Stark and
Pepper Potts through dialogue. Also singled out was his tying up of the
Detroit Steel rivalry from the "Stark Resilient" storyline, and the development of Potts and Cabe. Evans questioned, however, the pacing in issue 504, and the use of runes for
dwarven profanity in 506. Evans called
Salvador Larroca's art "perfect", specifying his design of
Grey Gargoyle/Mokk, and the facial expressions with which he depicted Tony's reactions to the stone Parisians, but criticized his rendition of the dwarves' facial expressions for not matching their dialogue. Evans gave a
"D+", however, to
Iron Man 2.0 #5, however, criticizing Nick Spencer for focusing on Iron Fist and the Immortal Weapons rather than
the book's star, and the all-set up nature of the story, and Ariel Olivetti for his "unnatural and stiff" artwork, and his "horrendous" computer-generated backgrounds, which according to Evans, were either nonexistent or little more than slightly manipulated photos. Dean Stell, reviewing
Hulk #36 and 37 for Weekly Comic Book Review, graded them "B+" and "A−", repeatedly congratulating writer
Jeff Parker for his ability to maintain his ongoing story despite the tie-in. Stell also took notice of Bettie Breitweiser's colors and lighting, which she felt were the only ones that depicted the Worthy in a way that they did not appear to be "
Tron-rejects". Joshua Yehl of IGN gave
Fear Itself: Hulk vs Dracula #1 an "Okay" rating of 6 out of 10, citing the dull, formulaic nature of the conflict, which was already seen in numerous other tie-in books. While Yehl thought
Ryan Stegman's settings were solid and featured intricately detailed backgrounds, the character work failed to inspire awe or fear. Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave issue #3 a "B+", citing the political intrigue of Dracula and the various breeds and factions of vampires, the introduction of the Forgiven, the sense that the book created something "new", compared to the other tie-ins that he felt went in circles, the balance between cartooniness and realism in Ryan Stegman's pencils, and the manner in which Mike Babinski and Rick Magyar's inks maintained that strength. Ray Tate gave the book 4 out of 5 bullets, likening the story to "an
Alias-like hyperkinetic spy mission" that succeeds where other creators' interpretations of the character failed, and which will satisfy ardent fans of the character. Tate attributed the narrative's fluidity to Peter Nguyen's character designs, which he compared to
Peter Chung's
Aeon Flux, and also applauded Veronica Gandini's colors. Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave the book a "Good" rating of 7 out of 10, describing it as a pointless tie-in with little effective conflict that does not fit well with the main storyline, albeit an enjoyable one with spy-flavored hijinks, and art that is fluid and energetic, if lacking in facial expressions. Jesse Schedeen, reviewing
Fear Itself: Spider-Man for IGN, gave issue #1 a "Good" rating of 7.5 out of 10, and "Great" ratings of 8.5 and 8 to issues 2 and 3. Despite thinking that the citizens depicted were a bit too archetypal, he felt issue #1 properly covered the effects of the Serpent on the populace that were ignored by
Fear Itself #2 that week, including those inflicted on Spider-Man that formed a classic set of insurmountable circumstances for him that rivaled his fight with
Morlun in the 2005-2006 "
The Other" storyline. Schedeen felt Mike McKone's art was clean and cinematic, but varied between his familiar style and a flat, minimalist one in issue #1. Though issue #2 improved on this, he felt aspects of it were flat and rushed in issue #3. Dean Stell of Weekly gave a
"C" grade to the first two issues, saying that while it was not essential to the event, it established the street-level panic caused by it, providing "flavoring" to the crossover's story not present in the core miniseries, and that it featured many fine moments, his favorite of which was Spider-Man's confrontation with
J. Jonah Jameson. He nonetheless perceived problems in continuity and in the behavior of the mob attacking the Iranian cabbie. He also thought McKone's art was solid and effective, despite occasional problems in body proportions. James Hunt of Comic Book Resources praised issue #1 for "straddling the crossover line expertly", telling a genuine story rather than serving as an arbitrary tie-in, and for helping to allow the reader to understand the stakes of "Fear Itself" by showing the chaos created in the core miniseries. Though Hunt questioned the book's choice of villain, he was interested enough to see how the story's use of that villain would develop. Hunt also
Mike McKone's art and Jeremy Cox's colors, and their decision to depict a red-and-black version of Spider-Man's costume. Reviewing
Fear Itself: The Deep #1, Hunt opined that the book was not an essential tie-in. He criticized the destruction of New Atlantis, without any mention of
Utopia, which was supported by New Atlantis. He also thought that the development of Namor, while potentially interesting, did not entirely work. Though he suggested that
Defenders fans would enjoy the book's improvised incarnation of that team, and Lee Garbett's art clear and enjoyable, there was little to either complain about or distinguish it. Ray Tate gave the book 4 out of 5 bullets, however, finding the change in the Defenders roster engaging (
Loa in particular), and beautifully characterized. Tate also liked the creative team's design of the demons, and their rendition of the cast and their heroics. Jesse Schedeen of IGN rated issue #1 of "Mediocre" 5.5 out 10, finding the characterization at times erratic, inaccurate and flat, in particular that of Namor and Attuma. While Schedeen thought Garbett's art was "functional, if a little cramped" in the underwater scenes, he perceived a sharp divide in quality between his cover and interior work, and the colors to be too dim. At Comic Book Resources, Zawisza found
Fear Itself: The Home Front #1 to be "somewhere between forced and irrelevant". Zawisza criticized the Speedball story for a too-weighty collection of elements that threatened to stall it, and for artist Mike Mayhew's over-reliance on photo reference. Zawisza criticized
Peter Milligan's Agents of Atlas story for lacking "pizzazz", a clear direction and consistent characterization, but found Elia Bonetti's art a nice transition between Mayhew's and
Howard Chaykin's. Zawisza found the
J. Jonah Jameson story "little more than a one-page filler", though useful in reminder the reader of Jameson's presence in the Marvel Universe. Zawisza found Pepe Larraz's art in the
Broxton, Oklahoma story to be energetic and clean, and his characters believable. Overall, Zawisza felt the book did not add to "Fear Itself", but was a "nice" read, even if not a "must-read". Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave issue #1 a "Good" rating of 7 out of 10, saying that Gage handled the Speedball story with more depth and gravity than in the
Avengers Academy that featured a similar story, and that the exploration of why the
Superhuman Registration Act was abolished was welcome, though he questioned if the story was strong enough to go seven issues. Schedeen also enjoyed the story and art of Agents of Atlas, thought the inclusion of the J. Jonah Jameson tale was "bizarre", and felt Jim McCann's Broxton story explored the human element, if not memorably, and that overall, the book was not essential reading. Dean Stell, reviewing
Uncanny X-Men #540 - 543 for Weekly Comic Book Review, graded the issues "D+", "C+", "B−" and "D". Stell consistently denounced
Greg Land's art, which, despite exhibiting good linework and a cinematic style, suffered, according to Stell, from over-reliance on photo reference, and constant reuse of a limited number of poses and facial expressions, in particular the same face used for all the female characters. Stell also was unimpressed with Land's storytelling, his questionable choice in depicting Cyclops with beard stubble and putting Emma Frost in a cowgirl outfit for no discernible reason, and with Justin Ponsor's color palette and overabundance of highlights. Regarding the writing, he thought the first issue had an average story, and the next two were "pretty good", but disliked the final issue. Although he loved the thrashing that
Colossus gave
Juggernaut after decades of stories in which the latter dispatched the former, he disliked the
Namor-
Emma Frost romance, the
Kitty-Peter drama, and Cyclops' haughty demeanor toward the Mayor of San Francisco. Hunt felt that
Fear Itself: Uncanny X-Force #1, however, was one of the stronger tie-in books, opining that writer
Rob Williams lived up to the standard set by regular
X-Force writer
Rick Remender, exhibiting a similar density of ideas, well-pitched character work, and the same "fun" of that book, without aping Remender's writing style. However, Hunt felt the story suffered from being almost unrelated to the core "Fear Itself" storyline, and criticized the lack of clarity over the identity of the "unknown superhero" in danger, stating that it failed to invest the reader in his fate. Hunt also felt that
Simone Bianchi's art was looser than on his
Astonishing X-Men run, and criticized his lack of backgrounds, but enjoyed his intricate visuals and his restrained rendering. Jesse Schedeen of IGN, however, gave each of the three issues "Mediocre" ratings of 5.5, 5.0 and 5.5 out of 10, complaining that the story was barely related to the crossover, that the characterization was "bland" and unengaging, the humor "stilted", that it was entertaining on only a superficial level, and of Simone Bianchi's poorly defined and figure-crowded page construction, bizarre anatomy and storytelling that lacked a proper flow. Hunt was pleased with
Fear Itself: Wolverine #1, in particular its depiction of Wolverine and Melita's relationship, and their contrasting views on informational freedom. Though he saw potential in the otherwise generic S.T.R.I.K.E. mercenaries, he again was displeased that the story had nothing to do with the core "Fear Itself" narrative. While Hunt felt artist Roland Boschi made writer Seth Peck's heavy exposition effective, and found Dan Brown's colors serviceable, he found little inspiring about the book artistically. Poet Mase of IGN gave issue #1 an "Okay" rating of 6.5 out of 10, saying that while he felt the villain's plot was plausible, it was somewhat stifled under the weight of text exposition that should have been handled by the visuals, and was unimpressed by Boschi's art or Dan Brown's colors, with some frames looking unfinished. He felt these issues were resolved by issue #2, which he rated a "Good" 7.5 for being a good middle issue. Nonetheless, while he felt that Peck's focus on the power of fear over rationality, and the buildup of Melita's panic were well-done, he felt her journey through Manhattan to be somewhat aimless, a major plot point dispensed with via a poor plot device, and the final page a letdown.
Fear Itself: Wolverine has the lowest score of any tie-in at Comic Book Roundup, with 4.3 out of 10. Reviewing
Thunderbolts #158 - 162, Stell gave a "B+" to the first and last issues, and a "B" to the middle three, citing writer Jeff Parker's effortless integration of the crossover into the book, his ability to fit large amounts of story into each issue with good pacing and his depiction of tension and relationship development of the team members. Stell also opined that all of the stories by different creators in the anthology issue #159 were good (Parker's Underbolts story in particular). However, he criticized the rehashing of material in issue 158 that was covered in the main miniseries, and Marvel editorial, however for inconsistency in Man-Thing's appearances in different books of the crossover. Stell enjoyed Kev Walker and Declan Shalvey's illustration of individual issues, an improvement over pre-crossover attempts on their part to share the duties, citing Walker's inking in particular, but was slightly disappointed by Valentine de Landro and Matthew Southworth's art, whose storytelling clarity was not substandard in areas, and whose overly buxom depiction of
Moonstone clashed with Walker and Shalvey's. Jamil Scalese of Comics Bulletin gave 4 out of 5 bullets to issue #160, also cheered Parker's crossover tie-in abilities, recalling his Thunderbolts work during the 2010
"Shadowland" storyline, and commending Declan Shalvey's rendition of the characters as "superb", and the style he employed when depicting the heroes infiltrating Juggernaut's soul. Minhquan Nguyen, reviewing
Herc #3 - 6 for Weekly Comic Book Review, gave a "B+" to three of the issues, and an "A−" to issue #4. Nguyen appreciated that the minor connection to the crossover did not hijack the book's in-progress storyline, which was filled with action and humor, though he felt the writing in the latter two issues was hurried and underdeveloped. Nguyen praised penciler Neil Edwards' clean, detailed art, and how his design of the mythic characters, combined both classical and modern elements. He also complimented Scott Hanna's inks and Jesus Aburtov's colors. Sam Salama Cohén of Comics Bulletin gave 3.5 bullets to issue #4, celebrating Greg Pak and Fred Van Lente's accurate portrayal of Hercules, a welcome reinvigoration of the character following the "endless Limbo of poor characterization and mockery" to which Cohén felt the Greek hero had thus far been relegated. Cohén also said that Neil Edwards' art style had grown on him, extolling Edwards' depiction of both Hercules' "snarkiness" and his bold resolve. Though Cohén felt the book was a good follow up on the previous story arc, he felt it lacked that story's perfect mix of humor, action and foreboding. Alex Evans of Weekly Comic Book Review gave a
"C+" to
Ghost Rider #1, opining that the book featured some excellent ideas and solid artwork by Matthew Clark that were hampered by the crossover and some at times "sketchy" writing, which included flat humor, overwritten dialogue, the relegation of expository material to the backup story and an unlikable protagonist threatening children. Doug Zawisza found
Fear Itself: Fearsome Four #1's attempt to marry the disparate art styles of
Michael Kaluta, Ryan Bodenheim, and
Simon Bisley uneven and inconsistent (in particular their different renderings of
Howard the Duck), even though each artist served their purpose, with the result reading like "a poor man's anthology that's written to fill a projected collected edition than a coherent run at a single tale." Zawisza thought the book was "slow and choppy", the characters an "odd assortment", and not worth the price of the next issue. At Comics Bulletin, Ray Tate gave four bullets and three bullets to issues 1 and 2, respectively, saying that in the first issue, Montclare's characterization was authentic and exhibited pathos, and Kaluta adept in his rendition of Nighthawk, recalling his previous work on
DC Comics' equivalent character, but was somewhat perplexed by the resemblance of Bodenheim's Howard the Duck to the
feature film version. Regarding issue #2, he thought Montclare's exposition of Frankenstein's whereabouts since the 1970s was intelligent, and Ryan Bodenheim's art strong, but thought Montclare's characterization of Nighthawk gratuitous and implausible, and found Bisley's art "scratchy, unattractive and often confusing". Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave issue #1 a "Mediocre" rating of 5.5, saying that despite the clever premise, citing a lack of emotional appeal or any narrative rationale in the choice of the book's cast, the inconsistent tone, and an artist roster that creates a "jumbled" feel. Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave the issue a grade of
"D", saying that it had an acceptable premise that was badly executed, citing the choice of characters used in the story, and Bodenheim's art, which deviated from his usual style, and in some areas looked rushed, or appeared to be an attempt to ape Mike Kaluta's style. Danny Djeljosevic and Nick Hanover of Comics Bulletin gave 3 out of 5 bullets to
Alpha Flight #1, seeing its tie-in to "Fear Itself" as a forced way to use the crossover to gain attention for that team, while only paying lip service to the crossover's storyline. They also complained about the heavy handed opening scenes, the lack of exposition that would make "Fear Itself" aspects of the story confusing to readers of the trade paperback and problematic characterizations of
Shaman and
Snowbird. The reviewers were both disappointed with the art, with Hanover criticizing
Dale Eaglesham for "the worst artistic interpretation of Vancouver I've ever seen". Joshua Yehl of
Broken Frontier thought Pak and Van Lente succeeded in evoking a sense of dread, as well as a sense of natural humor, and described Eaglesham's art as "masterful throughout." Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave the issue a "B" for recapturing the feel of the 1980s series, and describing it as "mostly a big, fast-paced fight scene that works really well and is enjoyable to read", though he was disinterested by the political aspects of the plot, and disliked the use of
Northstar. Dean Stell of Weekly Comic Book Review gave
Fear Itself: Deadpool #1 a "C+", saying that while the story's lack of impact on the crossover made it inessential reading, the concept of Deadpool's attempt to exploit the global panic upheld the book's signature tongue-in-cheek tone, and Bong Dazo's art fit this tone well. Jesse Schedeen of IGN gave issue #1 an "Okay" rating of 6.0, expressing the view that Deadpool's exploitation of a suburban family's paranoia and fear was so close sentiments in the aftermath of the
September 11 attacks that writer Christopher Hastings struck at the heart of the crossover's core ideas, and that although some elements were characterized by dawdling exposition, spoilers and heavy-handed attempts at humor, penciller Bong Dazo was adroitly brought the physical humor to life. However, Schedeen gave issue #3 an "Awful" rating of 3.5, saying that Hastings' "painful" script consisted of a truncated plot, forced, unfunny cultural references, unresolved plot holes, and a nonsensical ending, and that despite Dazo's art, he advised readers not to buy the book.
Epilogue and aftermath book reviews Erik Norris of IGN
Fear Itself #7.1: Captain America a "Great" rating of 8.5 out of 10, saying that Ed Brubaker and
Jackson Guice offer more substantial content than in the entire core miniseries, calling it a "must-read" for Captain America fans, including those who did not like the "Fear Itself" event, and saying that Brubaker admirably redeems the poor depiction of Bucky's death in the miniseries. Norris gave
Fear Itself #7.2: Thor a "Good" rating of 7 out of 10, saying that Matt Fraction's subtle, vague handling of Thor's death and resurrection properly utilized meta concepts that incorporated the event into Norse mythology. Norris also praised Fraction's handling of Spider-Man. He was disappointed with
Adam Kubert's art, however, in spite of the fact that he is a fan of Kubert, finding the artist's choice of panel layout and composition perplexing. Joey Esposito of IGN gave a 7 out of 10 "Good" rating to
Fear Itself: The Fearless #1, saying that while it is not essential reading, nor an enticement to read the crossover, it provided a fun, enjoyable setup for ongoing stories featuring Sin and Valkyrie, despite some instances of flat dialogue. Esposito also noted the strengths and weaknesses of artists
Paul Pelletier, Danny Miki, Matthew Wilson and
Mark Bagley, saying, "Neither artist completely nails it out of the park to the best of their ability, but the book gets well enough to entice the reader's eyeballs." ==In other media==