History of textile work Sewing has often been considered
women's work and not regarded as important enough to declare. Textiles have moved with cultural movements. Within Western Society, textiles are described usually as 'textiles' or 'fiber'. These two terms most commonly connote ideas identified with domesticity and women's creativity. This version of women's creativity is labor-intensive yet unfairly devalued as
women's work, becoming invisible and described as non-productive in a hetero-normative patriarchal society. The
Industrial Revolution changed the whole industry. Women started to sew less because it became more affordable to purchase well-made clothing from stores. Fabric retailers found that they needed to convince women to return to their sewing machines, so the companies devised a variety of strategies to revitalize sewing. A theme that many retailers employed was to send out the message that sewing not only saved money and let them explore their personal style, but was also a way to be feminine and show gracefulness. Sewing was portrayed as a way to be a good mother and an attractive and thrifty wife. Dr. Deborah Thom, professor at Cambridge University, helps detail out a time when fiber art took a feminist turn during the
Suffrage Movement when women were making embroidered banners for their protests.
The reclamation of fiber arts In the 1970s, needlework was reclaimed by the
feminist movement. This began the reintroduction of textiles and fiber in 'high art'.
Judy Chicago founded the first feminist art program in the United States, and proceeded to coin the name
feminist art, with many artists working with fiber arts, especially in her project
Womanhouse. Chicago created one of the first pieces of "high art" that incorporates and celebrates needlework and fabrics within women's history, called
The Dinner Party (1979).
Linda Nochlin would advance
feminist art history and
theory by publishing her groundbreaking essay
Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists? The Subversive Stitch In 1984,
Rozsika Parker published
The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the making of the feminine. Parker has published books on art history and psychotherapy, and uses theories from both fields in her analysis of "women's work". Parker examines the belief of women and embroidery as both feminine and natural, and the appearance of natural that is actually socially constructed. Her analysis on feminism is strongly argued that needlework signifies the relationship between women and the domestic sphere. Gendering that concept dates back to the 1500s when other crafts such as embroidery and textile work were made by women. Many people had varying reactions from emotionally moved to deeply disgraced after seeing the exhibitions 'The Subversive Stitch', of which incorporated two shows called 'Embroidery in Women's Lives 1300–1900' and 'Women in Textiles Today' in July 1989, as recorded in Pennina Barnett's article "Afterthoughts on curating 'The Subversive Stitch' ". The critical response from women and feminist's reviews and articles were similar. These two shows were based on Parker's book.
Germaine Greer, who advocates for the connection of women, nature, and craft, argued that women's craft should be in the home because it is a living art, not in a gallery or museum because galleries and museums are representative of dead male culture. Greer supports the use of textiles in different settings, of which craftivism almost always employs. Modern craftivist is knowing as
handicraft because people use it to crafting to protest or transmitted information when they protest.
Fiber arts today In
Hoopla: The Art of Unexpected Embroidery, author Leanne Prain includes interviews with fiber artists from around the world about their work within contemporary art and commercial design. While each interview is tailored to the individual artist, Prain always asks, "Do you believe that your gender or social class has any bearing on your attraction to an involvement with needlework?" Overall, the answers reveal a recognition of the medium's feminine origins and an appreciation for the feminist attitudes that it supports. However, modern fiber arts is not strictly a feminist endeavor despite its history. In a review of the "Pricked: Extreme Embroidery" exhibit at the Museum of Arts and Design (January–April 2008), Karen Rosenberg notes that the medium has expanded to such a degree that there are many approaches which artists may take to distinguish themselves. She conjectures that curators intentionally eschewed the word "craft" to instead focus on things like "process" and "materiality" and concentrate on more serious topics. Rosenberg argues that the ability of needlework to stand in for and rise above traditional painting lends credence to the theory of fiber arts no longer being considered a niche practice, and notes that the artists have "done much to erode the distinction between the fine and the decorative arts". In
The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine, Kate Walker writes: The overall tone of the textile and fiber arts today sounds usually similar to feminist theory and strategy when Ann Newdigate states: In 2013, Canadian artist,
Colleen Heslin won national recognition for her piece
Almost Young and Wild and Free which was praised for its "fresh approach to a traditional medium" using textiles and craftwork to produce a colourful, abstract canvas of dyed materials. == List of notable fiber artists ==