Domestic reviews Critical response to the film was mixed but mostly positive in Denmark, including praise for Madsen's direction, the performances of Lindhardt, Mikkelsen, Stengade and Mygind; The film "has shocked Danish audiences" for its portrayal of the protagonists as non-heroic, and has been
criticised by historians.
Berlingskes Ebbe Iversen commented that it can be both good and bad to have morally ambiguous characters as it can be seen as "an artistic force" to have "authentic protagonists psychology", but it can also be frustrating to have their motives portrayed as "enigmatic". The critic stated it did not make it a bad film, instead "its subtle, not uncritical portrayal of the resistance seems sober and serious, the style is worked out to the smallest detail, and in its outer form the film is the type of work that you unkindly call conventional and more kindly describe as classic." Kim Skotte of
Politiken said it had more gunfire than psychology and that it lacked a more detailed explanation of the characters' backgrounds that would justify their personalities. Writing for
Jyllands-Posten, Johs. H. Christensen wrote that there "never occurs any real connection, no excitement, no interaction, no common destiny between Flame and Citron, although they are inextricably linked most of the time".
DR's Per Juul Carlsen declared on '''' that although the film is visually beautiful, he is not sure it should be this way: "Had it not been better and more correct to tell the story really ugly and blurry in the rain instead of sunshine ... with realism instead of polished exquisiteness[?]". He also criticized it for sharing too much of the American gangster and spy film clichés.
International reviews The film was generally well received by Western critics. Based on 70 reviews collected by
Rotten Tomatoes, it has an overall approval rating of 86 percent from critics and an
average score of 6.8 out of 10. According to the website's consensus, the film, "though lengthy and sprawling, is gripping and competently made".
SFGates Walter stated, "[t]hough the material might lend itself to heavy-handedness, director Ole Christian Madsen is steady, and he gets fine performances from the two leads and [Stine] Stengade." Marc Savlov of
The Austin Chronicle commented that "Mikkelsen and Lindhardt are spectacularly invested in their roles. ... Beyond that is a drop-dead gorgeous period noir, rife with paranoia, femmes fatales, and good men inexorably sinking into the bloody mire and opaque texture of life (and death) during wartime." Abeel praised how, by "[a]voiding the docu-style string of anecdotes of many fact-based films, it offers the shapeliness and irony of classic drama". Fuchs applauded the interpolation of emotional relations as they "help to make
Flame & Citrons taut action even more effective. Beautifully choreographed and filmed in deep shadows that cut the violence into shadowy, brutal fragments, Flame and Citron's jobs are at once thrilling and disconcerting". Nick de Semlyen from
Empire considered it an average film, saying "It's familiar ground for anyone who's seen
Black Book or
Sophie Scholl, but director Ole Christian Madsen steers a skilful course, keeping things grim but not to an off-putting extent, bringing a
David Lynch-esque vibe to Flame's hotel dalliances with a shady lady and pulling off an incredible death scene for one of the leads." Noel Murray of
The A.V. Club criticized it for "hammer[ing] too hard on the shopworn theme of how war sickens souls. Far more interesting is
Flame & Citrons other theme: the idea that war turns the notion of 'shades of gray' into a luxury". V. A. Musetto, for the
New York Post, commented that, although it "features well-choreographed shootouts and assassinations", its "script is too melodramatic and complicated for its own good". Burr mostly praised it but said that "Madsen eventually loses his way", stating that there was "not enough" information about Citron and that the film "feels packed with events and frustratingly unfocused".
, a 2006 Dutch film by Paul Verhoeven (pictured''). Although he praised the "beautifully choreographed and shot" action sequences, Murray criticized
Flame & Citron for "lean[ing] toward the handsome and thoughtful when it could stand to be a lot dirtier and more visceral", citing
Black Book as a "superb counter-example". O'Sullivan said that "
Inglourious Basterds-style wish fulfillment this isn't,"
Art-house film status Usually described as a drama or a thriller, it has also been described as an
art-house film. Lodge stated it has "stately middle-arthouse stylings and thriller overtones". Nick Roddick of the
London Evening Standard commented that "it could succumb to the
Sod's Law of foreign-language cinema: make movie too commercial and you risk losing both audiences." Abeel opined, "This icy portrait of two assassins shooting Nazis point-blank offers no Hollywood-style uplift to mollify mainstream viewers. But
Flame [
& Citron] should pull in a niche group of World War II connoisseurs and will delight art-house and fest audiences with its innovative mix of drama and history filtered through genre."
Awards and nominations The film was nominated for fourteen
Robert Awards, winning Best Costume Design, Best Make-Up, Best Production Design, Best Sound, and Best Special Effects. Out of three
Bodil Awards nominations,
Flame & Citron won Best Cinematography. At the
Zulu Awards, it won all three awards for which it was nominated. The film was also nominated for the
European Film Awards,
Marrakech International Film Festival, and
Valladolid International Film Festival, but did not win any award. ==Historical accuracy==