Orthodox view Orthodox Judaism interprets () as forbidding homosexual acts between two men, and calls it an
abomination. ( specifically prohibits such relationships with one's father or uncle.) There is no punishment prescribed in the Torah for sex acts between two women (
lesbianism), but rabbinic law has prohibited it as an extension of the "
activities of (ancient) Egypt" (see ). Although the practice is not considered
adultery in the formal sense, the
Talmud (
Yevamot 76a), in the name of Rav Huna, suggests that women engaged in such practices are forbidden to marry a
priest of Aaron's lineage. Others posit that such relationships do not prohibit the woman unto a
kohen, since it is merely an act of
lewdness. However, such practices are still censured and are said to be an infringement of the prohibition, "You shall not do as they do in the land of Egypt" (Leviticus 18:3).
Conservative view Conservative Judaism's
Committee on Jewish Law and Standards has validated different approaches to homosexual acts, with one opinion being like the Orthodox position in many respects, and another opinion permitting many forms of homosexual sex, while continuing to regard
anal intercourse between men as prohibited. According to
Conservative rabbi and
Bible scholar
Jacob Milgrom, the Torah prohibits men lying with men in illicit ways, that are incestuous or adulterous, but otherwise homosexual relations are allowed. In 2012, the American branch of Conservative Judaism represented by the
Rabbinical Assembly devised a commitment ceremony for same-sex couples, though not defined as
kiddushin. In 2014, the British group Masorti Judaism said it would support
shutafut ceremonies for same-sex unions. In 2016, the Rabbinical Assembly passed a resolution supporting transgender rights.
Humanistic Judaism In 2004, the
Society for Humanistic Judaism issued a resolution supporting "the legal recognition of marriage and divorce between adults of the same sex", and affirming "the value of marriage between any two committed adults with the sense of obligations, responsibilities, and consequences thereof".
Reform view Reform Judaism interprets Leviticus 18:22 as forbidding men from using sex as a form of ownership over men. Reform Jewish authors have revisited the Leviticus text, and ask why the text mentions that one should not lie with a man "as with a woman". If it is to be assumed that the Torah does not waste words, the authors ask why the Torah includes this extra clause. Most Reform Jews suggest that since intercourse involved possession (one of the ways in which a man "acquired" a wife was to have intercourse with her), similar to the Christian theology of using sex to "consummate" a marriage, it was abhorrent that a man might acquire another man—it is not the act of homosexual intercourse itself which is abhorrent, but using this act to acquire another man and therefore confuse the gender boundary. == Bestiality ==