The term gained prominence when it was used by
Antonio Gramsci in 1934 in his essay "Americanism and Fordism" in his
Prison Notebooks. Since then, it has been used by a number of writers on
economics and society, mainly but not exclusively in the
Marxist tradition. According to historian
Charles S. Maier, Fordism proper was preceded in Europe by
Taylorism, a technique of labor discipline and workplace organization, based upon supposedly scientific studies of human efficiency and incentive systems. It attracted European intellectuals, especially in Germany and Italy, from the
fin de siècle to
World War I. After 1918, however, the goal of Taylorist labor efficiency thought in Europe moved to "Fordism", the reorganization of the entire productive process by the moving assembly line, standardization, and the mass market. The grand appeal of Fordism in Europe was that it promised to sweep away all the archaic residues of precapitalist society, by subordinating the economy, society, and even the human personality to the strict criteria of technical rationality. Historian Thomas Hughes has detailed how the
Soviet Union, in the 1920s and the 1930s, enthusiastically embraced Fordism and Taylorism by importing American experts in both fields as well as American engineering firms to build parts of its new industrial infrastructure. The concepts of the
Five-Year Plan and the centrally-
planned economy can be traced directly to the influence of Taylorism on Soviet thinking. Hughes quotes
Joseph Stalin's
Foundations of Leninism: Hughes describes how, as the Soviet Union developed and grew in power, both the Soviets and the Americans chose to ignore or deny the contribution of American ideas and expertise. The Soviets did so because they wished to portray themselves as creators of their own destiny and not indebted to their rivals, while the Americans did so because they did not wish to acknowledge, during the Cold War, their part in creating a powerful rival. ==Post-Fordism==