Introduced vs. reintroduced species In making the determination to protect and manage free-roaming horses on some western Federal lands in 1971 Congress declared them to be "living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West (that) contribute to the diversity of life forms within the Nation". However, their ecological status in the western landscape is under considerable debate. Some free-roaming horses advocates believe "they have a place on the Western landscape as a reintroduced native species." They argue that the horses have reinhabited an ecological niche vacated when they went extinct in North America 10,000 years ago, claiming that the 10,000 year gap is irrelevant. The National Academy of Science refutes that claim, stating that because of the large changes that have taken place in the North American environment in the past 10,000 years: "It cannot be argued that ecological voids dating back 10 millennia exist and that
introduced forms are restoring some kind of earlier integrity." Bob Garrot, director of the Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program at
Montana State University takes the opposite position, explaining, "(A)re they native? Are they the same critters that were there 10,000 years ago? Well, no they aren’t. Those horses are not the same horses that were here in the Pleistocene. The Western landscapes are not the same landscapes, neither are the plant and animal communities." According to the
National Research Council, most free-roaming horse herds are outside of
mountain lion and wolf habitat, the two modern species discussed as predators that could potentially control population growth. A study conducted in 1987-1997 and published in 2001 that is cited in the National Research Council report, indicated that mountain lions could influence the population growth of herds found in mountain lion habitat, but only if there is also a large enough deer population, the lion's natural food source, to maintain a dense lion population. According to a 2021 genetic study, ancient wild horses as well as the
woolly mammoth were still present in the
Yukon as recently as 5,700 years ago (mid-
Holocene), This and related studies are used to support the thesis that modern horses are closely enough related to their North American ancestors to be treated as native.
Management history Because free-roaming horse populations are not self-limiting, first non-government then government entities have taken on the task of managing their numbers. In 1930, there was an estimated population of between 50,000-150,000 feral horses in the western United States. In the same time period, a surplus of airplanes after WWII made aircraft widely available. The BLM would issue permits for airplane use, and mustangers used them and other motorized vehicles to capture the free roaming horses. In the 1950s,
Velma B. Johnston, who became known as "Wild Horse Annie", In 1972, the BLM approached Jay F. Kirkpatrick and John W. Turner and requested that they find a contraceptive that could be used to check the population growth of the free-roaming horses. Their efforts ultimately lead to the development of
Porcine zona pellucida or PZP, a contraceptive developed from the ovaries of slaughtered pigs. However, the treatment wasn't ready for field trial until 1992. Soon after passage of the WFRH&BA, the agencies began rounding up horses by paying contractors to use saddle horses to chase them into traps for removal. By 1977, there were 60,000 animals on the range, the lower end of numbers estimated to be on the range in 1930. In 1976, the
Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLMPA) authorized the agencies to use helicopters to push the horses into traps. and the BLM asserts that the helicopter roundups are humane. In 1978, the WFRH&BA was amended in the
Public Rangelands Improvement Act requiring the agencies to set "Appropriate Management Levels" (AML) and remove excess wild horses. Congress has not suggested that AML be raised, but instead has directed the BLM to look into more effective forms of population control. From 1971 through 2001, the BLM removed 193,000 horses and burros from the federal rangelands, but still could not maintain the populations at AML. instead, starting in 1984, placing 20,000 horses with large-scale adopters who took a minimum of 100 horses each. Non-compliance for approving and monitoring those adoptions caused
inhumane treatment and death to hundreds of the horses and many adopters sold thousands of them to slaughterhouses after gaining title. BLM terminated the large scale program in 1988 after negative publicity and pressure from the Congress
Madeleine Pickens announced her plans to buy a one million acre (4,000 km2) tract at an undisclosed location "in the West" and establish a sanctuary for the horses, which she would adopt and maintain at private expense. Shortly thereafter she stated that the recession forced many of the donors she hoped would help her pay for the venture backed out, and she requested the BLM pay her a yearly stipend of $500 per horse to maintain the horses. The BLM responded that it was not possible to enter into the contract she requested. The BLM did put out invitations for Pickens and others who wished to provide lands to maintain horses for the BLM in "Eco_Sanctuaries" to submit proposals for evaluation. Pickens submitted a proposal to maintain horses on private and public lands in Nevada, that the BLM agreed to evaluate but evaluation of the proposal stalled after scoping found issues that have yet to resolved. There are currently two sanctuaries in Wyoming maintaining horses for the BLM on private lands. In 2001, BLM committed to reducing the population to AML by 2005 by increasing the number of animals removed each year. From 2001 until 2008, over 74,000 animals were removed, but with adoption rates having dropped 36% since the 1990s, only 46,400 were adopted out. This resulted in public outcry. From fiscal year 2006 through 2009—though there was no restriction on selling or euthanizing excess horses—BLM chose not to exercise either option due to "concerns over public and Congressional reaction to the large-scale slaughter of thousands of healthy horses." Though not directly repealing the Burns Amendment, the Rahall Rider has been added to every appropriations bill from FY 2010 through FY 2018. To comply with these annual restrictions, the BLM purchase contract has a statement prohibiting purchasers from processing horses into commercial products. The BLM continued removing large numbers of horses, but by 2013, had no more space in long-term or short term holding facilities for the excess, and removal rates dropped from 8,255 in 2012 to 1,857 in 2014. In a 2014 report by the House Appropriations Committee it was stated "The horse and burro management program in its current state is unsustainable and the Committee cannot afford to perpetuate the situation for much longer." In both the 2015 and 2016 budgets the Rahall language to prevent euthanizing and selling without limitation excess horses and to continue to allow funds to be used for long term holding. However, the amount allocated did not allow the BLM to conduct sufficient gathers to achieve the Senate's directive, and on September 9, 2016, the BLM Wild Horse Resource Advisory Board (RAC) recommended the BLM be allowed to start euthanizing or selling without limitation horses to "alleviate space in the holding facilities to save the BLM more money in which they could use for gathers and start relieving some of these impacted rangelands." In response to the RAC recommendation, the
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) refuted the idea that the BLM should remove horses to achieve AML and instead implement fertility control. In January 2017,
Freedom Caucus member Representative
Morgan Griffith from Virginia wanted to implement the
Holman Rule, that would slash individual pay of government workers to $1, citing the $80 million cost of administering the free-roaming horse program as one among many examples of misspent government resources. Instead of implementing the RAC recommendation the Rahall language was again included in the budget bill which finally passed on May 5, 2017, to manage spending until the end of the FY2017, but the increased Congressional attention on the costs of the program, The explanatory statement accompanying the budget reflected increased Congressional attention on the costs of the program, and required the BLM to prepare and submit: "a plan to achieve long-term sustainable populations on the range in a humane manner" giving the agency 180 days, until early November, to submit the plan (hereafter referred to as the "report"). On May 23, 2017, President
Donald Trump released the
FY2018 Interior Budget in Brief which, while reducing the free-roaming horse budget by ten million dollars, "proposes to give BLM the tools it needs to manage this program in a more cost-effective manner, including the ability to conduct sales without limitation. The budget proposed to eliminate appropriations language restricting BLM from using all of the management options authorized in the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act. The remainder of the funding decrease would be achieved by reducing gathers, reducing birth control treatments, and other activities deemed inconsistent with prudent management of the program." Despite Senate prodding on November 20, 2017, stating: "The Committee looks forward to the release of the report...and is hopeful that it will contain a range of humane and politically viable options that can collectively be implemented to drastically reduce on-range populations and a variety of methods to limit unsustainable on-range reproduction", On April 26, 2017, the BLM submitted the report as required, providing several options for Congress to consider, including fertility control as recommended by the HSUS, mostly consisting of permanent sterilization. In the meantime, the Department of Interior budget request for fiscal year 2019 had again requested that the restrictions of the Rahall amendment not be included in the 2019 budget The report stated that at the end of 2017, there was an estimated 83,000 wild horses and burros, or three times AML, on public lands. Mustangs kept in sanctuaries are also marked on the left
hip with four inch-high Arabic numerals that are also the last four digits of the freeze brand on the neck.
Other Western US herds Since the WFRH&BA applies only to unclaimed horses that were free roaming on lands managed by the BLM and USFS at the time of passage of the Act, •
Virginia Range Herd (Nevada) •
Sheldon Herd (Nevada) •
Theodore Roosevelt National Park Herd (North Dakota) •
Salt River Herd (Arizona) • Herds on Indian Reservations such as those on the
Pyramid Lake Paiute, the
Uintah and Ouray Ute and the
Ute Mountain Ute Reservations. However, horses from the Ute Mountain Reservation are migrating into the
Mesa Verde National Park causing a management dilemma for the Park. Herds of free roaming horses on the
Navajo Reservation have multiplied to the point that the tribe is considering multiple options, including roundups, adoption, sterilization, sales, and even hunting.
Horses vs. wildlife and livestock on public lands Much of the debate as to whether free-roaming horses are an
Introduced vs. Reintroduced species is in the context of the priority of use of the resources of public lands the horses should have in relation to wildlife and livestock. but what and how management occurs is hotly debated. Advocates for free-roaming horses suggest reducing the numbers of sheep and cattle permitted to graze on public lands to allocate more resources for horses, ranching interests hold the opposite, wishing to see horse numbers maintained at AML, while wildlife advocates want to prioritize native species over both domestic livestock and free-roaming horses. The numbers of cows that can graze the range decreases as the number of horses increases. The debate as to how much horses compete with cows for forage is multifaceted.
Ruminates such as cattle and sheep, with their multi-chambered stomachs, can extract more energy from their feed, and thus require less, but more high quality forage, such as leaves and forbs. Horses are
evolutionarily adapted to survive in an
ecological niche dominated by "fibrous herbage" (i.e. low quality grass forage) due to being "
hindgut fermenters", meaning that they digest nutrients by means of the
cecum. Thus, horses are adapted to inhabit an
ecological niche characterized by poor quality vegetation. While this means that they extract less energy from a given amount of forage, it also means that they can digest food faster and make up the difference in efficiency by increasing their consumption rate, obtaining adequate
nutrition from lower quality forage than can ruminants. Horses can, however, cover vast distances to find water and the high fibrous grasses they thrive on; they may range nine times as far from water sources as cattle, traveling as much as to from a water source. This means they can reach grazing land that cattle cannot access. Unlike cows, horse
incisors allow them to graze plants much closer to the ground increasing recovery time for the plant. Another concern is that Feral horses compete for water with other wildlife species, and often are dominant over some, such as the
pronghorn, which in drought conditions causes stress that impacts the survival. ==See also==