Fabius wrote a history of Rome some time between 215 and 200 BC. His work was certainly published before 192 BC, either during or shortly after the Second Punic War. Bruce W. Frier has proposed a publication date no later than 213. Fabius' history was written in Greek, which was at that time the only language suitable to reach a large educated public in Italy, Greece and elsewhere in the Mediterranean world. The Latin
annales ascribed to a Fabius are thus most likely a later translation of his history, or perhaps a draft of his work in Latin later edited posthumously. In the words of
Arnaldo Momigliano, "under the impact of Hellenisation the natives of many countries were persuaded to rethink their national history and to present it in the Greek language to the educated readers of a multinational society." Some scholars have also argued that his history of Rome may have been primarily intended for an Hellenist audience. Fabius' work, which is variously called the
Annales Graeci or the
Romaika (≈
Romaion)
praxeis by ancient authors, comprised three large sections: one on the
ktisis (creation story), which included the first years of the Republic; a second part on "the antiquities after the foundation phase", that is the period from the
Decemvirate (ca. 450) to the
Pyrrhic War (280–275); and a third on the contemporary history from the outbreak of the
First Punic War onwards. Fabius' account of early Rome mixed historical elements with mythology. His story began with the "coming of Herakles into Italy" and the arrival of the legendary
Trojan refugee
Aeneas in
Latium. He dated the
founding of Rome to the "first year of the eighth
Olympiad", that is 747 BC. According to historian
Hans Beck, "the calculation of the city's foundation date that matched with Olympiad chronologies attests both to the call for accuracy and to the desire to stress an analogy to Greek culture." Fabius' work ended with his own recollections of the
Second Punic War, although it is unclear whether he survived long enough to record it entirely. Fabius' history has not survived, but it is partially known today through quotations and allusions by later authors. It is not certain whether the work was
annalistic, recounting events year by year, although citation of his work by other historians may imply that it was. According to Beck, however, the label "annalistic" should be avoided to describe Fabius' work, for the surviving fragments "make it plain that the conceptual assumptions of this model (lack of style, a mere compilation of people, places and prodigies) are not accurate." == Views and influences ==