Understanding of the underlying mechanisms that cause electrotaxis to occur is limited. The diversity of biological cells and environmental conditions make it likely that there are many different mechanisms that allow for cells to migrate due to electric fields. Some studies have indicated that certain organisms move passively without any specific sensing mechanisms applied to alter active motility.
Bacteria In a sufficiently strong electric field, small cells may move as uniformly
charged particles or
dipoles. Other research reports suggest that bacteria cells might perceive local electric fields via
chemotaxis. This is done by sensing
redox molecules that have formed a gradient relative to the poised electrical surface in the local environment.
Mammalian cells The method of detection of a field in mammalian cells is under active investigation and might involve several mechanisms. For now, it is thought that redistribution of
membrane-bound sensors dragged by Coulombic forces and
electro-osmosis at the membrane would cause the cell to polarize, then migrate. Mathematical modeling suggests that a 6-10% change in sensor concentration across the cell is detectable. Experiments that repeatedly changed orientation of a field applied to several cell lines suggest that sensor polarization occurs on a relatively rapid timescale, perhaps several seconds, compared to the cell migration response, which is observed after 5–10 minutes. This allows cells to time-average changes in the direction of the electric field before migrating. However, multiple explanations have been investigated, resulting in a considerable body of evidence and a limited understanding of how cells migrate using electric fields. Electrotaxis is thought to operate based on changes in Ca2+ concentration produced by direct-current electric fields () due to the fact that exposure to ) can cause concentration changes in excess of 1 millimolar. Additionally,
calcium channel inhibition using Co2+ or D600 was observed to prevent electrotaxis in most cases. Cells that exhibit electrotaxis undergo an influx of Ca2+ ions on the anodal side of the cell, and simultaneous decrease in concentration on that cathodal side. This rearrangement is thought to create "push-pull" forces that induce net movement in the cathodal direction. However, this process would be more complicated in cells with intercellular calcium stores or
voltage-gated calcium channels. In addition,
voltage-gated sodium channels,
protein kinases,
growth factors,
surface charge, and protein electrophoresis have been observed to have a role in electrotaxis. The exact role and function of these and other cellular components in electrotaxis is not fully understood and is the basis of ongoing research. In the experiment, phosphorylated Src polarized in the direction of migration when influenced by physiological strength EFs, as is also seen in chemotaxis.
Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P3), another molecule used in signaling, polarized to the leading edge of HL60 cells when subjected to an EF. Upon reversal of the EF, polarization PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 rapidly reversed to the new direction of migration. Treatment with
lantruculin did not prevent this from occurring, indicating that polarization is not actin-dependent. Cells in which the gene encoding PI(3)Kγ,
Pik3cg, was disrupted exhibited reduced electrotaxic responses. Pharmocological inhibition of PI(3)K in keratinocytes produced the same results. Similarly, genetic disruption of PTEN resulted in increased phosphorylation of ERK and Akt and a greater electrotaxic response. Consideration of these results suggests that PI(3)Kγ and PTEN are involved in the signaling pathway used in electrotaxis. == Role in wound healing ==