Taxonomic history The genus
Ganoderma was established as a genus in 1881 by Karsten and included only one species,
G. lucidum (Curtis) Karst. Previously, this taxon was characterized as
Boletus lucidus Curtis (1781) and then
Polyporus lucidus (Curtis) Fr. (1821) (Karsten 1881). The species
P. lucidus was characterized by having a laccate (shiny or polished)
pileus and
stipe, and this is a character that
Murrill suspected was the reason for Karsten's division because only one species was included,
G. lucidum . Patouillard revised Karsten's genus
Ganoderma to include all species with pigmented spores, adhering tubes and laccate crusted pilei, which resulted with a total of 48 species classified under the genus
Ganoderma in his 1889 monograph. Until Murrill investigated
Ganoderma in North America in 1902, previous work had focused solely on European species including, for example,
G. lucidum,
G. resinaceum Boud. (1890) and
G. valesiacum Boud. (1895). •
Ganoderma lucidum - A polypore with limited distribution in Europe and parts of China, often misidentified on products labelled
reishi or
lingzhi that actually contain
Ganoderma sichuanense, because of the persistence of outdated naming conventions. •
Ganoderma pfeifferi - Also known as the
beeswax bracket. •
Ganoderma sichuanense (=G. lingzhi) - Also known as
lingzhi or
reishi; used extensively in traditional Asian medicine. •
Ganoderma sinense - Also known as
black reishi or
zizhi. •
Ganoderma tsugae - A polypore which grows on
conifers, especially
hemlock, giving it its common name,
hemlock varnish shelf. Similar in appearance to
Ganoderma lucidum and a close relative, which typically grows on
hardwoods. •
Ganoderma microsporum - A polypore found in Taiwan with a very small spore size.
Phylogeny The genus was named by
Karsten in 1881. Members of the family Ganodermataceae were traditionally considered difficult to classify because of the lack of reliable
morphological characteristics, the overabundance of
synonyms, and the widespread misuse of names. Until recently, the genus was divided into two sections –
Ganoderma, with a shiny cap surface (like
Ganoderma lucidum), and
Elfvingia, with a dull cap surface (like
G. applanatum).
Phylogenetic analysis using DNA sequence information have helped to clarify our understanding of the relationships amongst
Ganoderma species. The genus may now be divided into six
monophyletic groups: •
G. colossus group •
G. applanatum group •
G. tsugae group • Asian
G. lucidum group •
G. meredithiae group •
G. resinaceum group With the rise of molecular phylogenies in the late 20th century, species concept hypotheses were tested to determine the relatedness amongst the nuanced morphological variabilities of the laccate
Ganoderma taxa. In 1995, Moncalvo
et al constructed a phylogeny of the rDNA, which was the universally accepted locus at that time, and found five major clades of the laccate species amongst the 29 isolates tested. It turned out that
G. lucidum was not a monophyletic species, and further work needed to be done to clarify this taxonomic problem. They also found that
G. resinaceum from Europe, and the North American
G. lucidum, which Adaskaveg and Gilbertson found to be biologically compatible
in vitro, did not cluster together. Moncalvo
et al. reject biological species complexes as a sole tool to distinguish a taxon, and suggested using a combination between biological and phylogenetic species concepts to define unique
Ganoderma taxa. Historically, however,
Tomophagus has generally been regarded as a synonym for
Ganoderma. Nearly a century later, phylogenetic analyses vindicated Murrill's original placement, as it has shown to be a taxonomically distinct appropriate genus. ==Distribution and ecology==