Ryle has been characterized as an "
ordinary language" philosopher, a style of philosophy he helped pioneer. According to
Bryan Magee, Ryle's paper "Systematically Misleading Expressions" (1931) contains the "first clear public statement of the view of philosophy that has come to be known as
Linguistic Philosophy", while
G.J. Warnock says of his book,
The Concept of Mind, that "it was one of the first, and hence has been one of the most widely influential, attacks in the new style upon an old family of problems".
The Concept of Mind In
The Concept of Mind, Ryle argues that
dualism involves
category mistakes and philosophical
nonsense, two philosophical topics that continued to inform Ryle's work. He
rhetorically asked students in his 1967–68 Oxford audience what was wrong with saying that there are three things in a field: two cows and a pair of cows. They were also invited to ponder whether the
bunghole of a beer barrel is part of the barrel or not.
Knowing-how and knowing-that A distinction deployed in
The Concept of Mind, between 'knowing-how' and 'knowing-that', has attracted independent interest. This distinction is also the origin of procedural (
knowing-how) and declarative (
knowing-that) models of
long-term memory. This distinction is widely accepted in philosophy. By mapping the words and phrases of a particular statement, philosophers are able to generate what Ryle calls
implication threads: each word or phrase of a statement contributes to the statement in that, if the words or phrases were changed, the statement would have a different implication. The philosopher must show the directions and limits of different implication threads that a "concept contributes to the statements in which it occurs." To show this, he must be tugging at neighbouring threads, which, in turn, must also be tugging. Philosophy, then, searches for the meaning of these implication threads in the statements in which they are used. and "Thinking and Reflecting". According to Ryle, there are two types of descriptions: • thin description: surface-level observations of behaviour, e.g. "His right hand rose to his forehead, palm out, when he was in the vicinity of and facing a certain other human." • thick description: adds context to such behaviour. Explaining this context necessitates an understanding of the motivations people have for their behaviours, as well as how observers in the community understand such behaviour: "He saluted the General." ==Legacy==