Gryposaurus is
based on specimen
NMC 2278, a skull and partial skeleton collected in 1913 by
George F. Sternberg from what is now known as the
Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, along the
Red Deer River. and believed that some unusual pieces were evidence of compression. This idea was reflected in
William Parks's naming of a nearly complete skeleton from the Dinosaur Park Formation as
Kritosaurus incurvimanus, not
Gryposaurus incurvimanus (although he left
Gryposaurus notabilis in its own genus). Direct comparison between
Kritosaurus incurvimanus and
Gryposaurus notabilis is hindered by the fact that the
incurvimanus type specimen is missing the front part of the skull, so the full shape of the nasal arch cannot be seen. The 1942 publication of the influential
Lull and Wright
monograph on hadrosaurs sealed the
Kritosaurus/
Gryposaurus question for nearly fifty years in favor of
Kritosaurus. Reviews beginning in the 1990s, however, called into question the identity of
Kritosaurus navajovius, which has limited material for comparison with other duckbills. This
hypothesis was most common in the late 1970s–early 1980s, and appears in some popular books; one well-known work,
The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs, uses
Kritosaurus for the Canadian material (
Gryposaurus), but identifies the mounted skeleton of
K. incurvimanus as
Hadrosaurus in a photo caption. Although Horner in 1979 used the new combination
Hadrosaurus [Kritosaurus] notabilis for a partial skull and skeleton and a second less-complete skeleton from the
Bearpaw Shale of Montana Further research has revealed the presence of a second species,
G. latidens, from slightly older rocks in Montana than the classic gryposaur localities of Alberta. Based on two parts of a skeleton collected in 1916 for the
American Museum of Natural History,
G. latidens is also known from
bonebed material. Horner, who described the specimens, considered it to be a less
derived species. Multiple gryposaur species are known from the Kaiparowits Formation, represented by cranial and postcranial remains, and were larger than their northern counterparts. In Texas, specifically at the
Javelina Formation and the
El Picacho Formation, indeterminate hadrosaur remains resembling
Kritosaurus and
Gryposaurus have been unearthed for decades, but none were considered to be identifiable as a determined genus of hadrosaur, but do resemble some species of
Kritosaurini or at least some species of
Kritosaurus. However, in 2016, a possibly forth valid species of
Gryposaurus named
G. alsatei, which was named after
Alsate, who was the last leader of the
Mescalero Apaches, was unearthed in the Javelina Formation in Texas. Further research is needed to confirm its validity.
Species As of 2016, there are currently three named species that are recognized as valid today:
G. notabilis,
G. latidens, and
G. monumentensis. The
type species G. notabilis is from the
late Campanian-age
Upper Cretaceous Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, Canada.
G. latidens, from the
late Santonian-early Campanian
Lower Two Medicine Formation of
Pondera County, Montana, USA, is known from partial skulls and skeletons from several individuals. Its nasal arch is prominent like that of
G. notabilis, but farther forward on the snout, and its teeth are less
derived, reflecting
iguanodont-like characteristics. is an early, unused name for this species.
G. monumentensis is known from a skull and partial skeleton from Utah. Recently, a possible fourth species of
Gryposaurus,
Gryposaurus alsatei, was unearthed in the
Javelina Formation, which dates to the late
Maastrichtian, along with an unnamed species of
Kritosaurus and an undescribed
saurolophine which closely resembles
Saurolophus, but with a more solid crest. Fossil remains of
Gryposaurus have also been unearthed in the
El Picacho Formation in
Texas. The dubious hadrosaurid
Stephanosaurus marginatus was considered a possible species of
Kritosaurus, following the synonymy of
Gryposaurus with
Kritosaurus. However, this synonymy was rejected in the 2004 edition of the
Dinosauria, with
Stephanosaurus being tabulated as dubious. ==Description==