In 1886, the German naturalist
Max Schlosser erected the genus
Haplomeryx, known solely from
selenodont molars from the
Quercy Phosphorites. He proposed that its dentition is most similar to that of
Agriochoerus and established the species
Haplomeryx zitteli based on an upper jaw fragment consisting of three molars that in total measure long. He noted its small size and theorized that it was the only European member of mammals that were of close affinities with the North American
Agriochoerus. The etymology of the genus name derives in
Ancient Greek from (simple) and (ruminant) meaning "simple ruminant". In 1910, the Swiss palaeontologist
Hans Georg Stehlin made a review of
Haplomeryx amongst other European
artiodactyls, stating that he did not notice its fossils having been previously described under any synonymous name and that its overall anatomy is not known. The first species he erected was
H. Picteti based on fossil previously described from
Mormont in Switzerland, noting that the teeth are smaller than those of
H. zitteli and that it has slightly different molar morphologies. The second and other species that Stehlin named was
H. egerkingensis based on dentition from the
Swiss municipality of
Egerkingen. He also tentatively reclassified the species
Dichobune obliquum, previously described by the French naturalist
Georges Cuvier in 1822 as
Anoplotherium (
Dichobune)
obliquum, to
Haplomeryx as
H? obliquus.
H? obliquus is known only by a single specimen from
Montmartre in France, thus making its affinities problematic to resolve. The French palaeontologist
Charles Depéret established the species
H. Euzetensis based on dental fossils from the
French commune of
Euzet in 1917. He said that the species was intermediate in size between
H. zitteli and
H. picteti.
Classification Haplomeryx belongs to the
Xiphodontidae, a
Palaeogene artiodactyl family endemic to western Europe that lived from the Middle
Eocene to the Early
Oligocene (~44 Ma to 33 Ma). Like the other contemporary endemic artiodactyl families of western Europe, the evolutionary origins of the Xiphodontidae are poorly known. More specifically, the first xiphodont representatives to appear were the genera
Dichodon and
Haplomeryx by MP14.
Dichodon and
Haplomeryx continued to persist into the Late Eocene while
Xiphodon made its first appearance by MP16. Another xiphodont
Paraxiphodon is known to have occurred only in MP17a localities. The former three genera lived up to the Early Oligocene where they have been recorded to have all gone extinct as a result of the Grande Coupure faunal turnover event. The phylogenetic relations of the Xiphodontidae as well as the
Anoplotheriidae,
Mixtotheriidae and
Cainotheriidae have been elusive due to the
selenodont morphologies (or having crescent-shaped ridges) of the molars, which were convergent with
tylopods or ruminants. Some researchers considered the selenodont families Anoplotheriidae, Xiphodontidae, and Cainotheriidae to be within Tylopoda due to postcranial features that were similar to the tylopods from North America in the Palaeogene. Other researchers tie them as being more closely related to ruminants than tylopods based on dental morphology. Different
phylogenetic analyses have produced different results for the "
derived" (or of new evolutionary traits) selenodont Eocene European artiodactyl families, making it uncertain whether they were closer to the Tylopoda or Ruminantia. Possibly, the Xiphodontidae may have arisen from an unknown
dichobunoid group, thus making its resemblance to tylopods an instance of
convergent evolution. {{clade| style=font-size:85%; line-height:85% In 2022, Weppe created a phylogenetic analysis in his academic thesis regarding Palaeogene artiodactyl lineages, focusing most specifically on the endemic European families. He stated that his phylogeny was the first formal one to propose affinities of the Xiphodontidae and Anoplotheriidae. He found that the Anoplotheriidae, Mixtotheriidae, and Cainotherioidea form a clade based on
synapomorphic dental traits (traits thought to have originated from their most recent common ancestor). The result, Weppe mentioned, matches up with previous phylogenetic analyses on the Cainotherioidea with other endemic European Palaeogene artiodactyls that support the families as a clade. As a result, he argued that the proposed superfamily Anoplotherioidea, composing of the Anoplotheriidae and Xiphodontidae as proposed by Alan W. Gentry and Hooker in 1988, is invalid due to the
polyphyly of the lineages in the phylogenetic analysis. However, the Xiphodontidae was still found to compose part of a wider clade with the three other groups. Within the Xiphodontidae, Weppe's phylogeny tree classified
Haplomeryx as a sister taxon to the clade consisting of
Xiphodon plus
Dichodon. == Description ==