Over seven decades, Barzun wrote and edited more than forty books touching on an unusually broad range of subjects, including
science and
medicine,
psychiatry from
Robert Burton through
William James to modern methods, and
art, and
classical music; he was one of the all-time authorities on
Hector Berlioz. Some of his books—particularly
Teacher in America and
The House of Intellect—enjoyed a substantial lay readership and influenced debate about culture and education far beyond the realm of academic history. Barzun had a strong interest in the tools and mechanics of writing and
research. He undertook the task of completing, from a manuscript almost two-thirds of which was in first draft at the author's death, and editing (with the help of six other people), the first edition (published 1966) of ''
Follett's Modern American Usage. Barzun was also the author of books on literary style (Simple and Direct
, 1975), on the crafts of editing and publishing (On Writing, Editing, and Publishing
, 1971), and on research methods in history and the other humanities (The Modern Researcher'', which has seen at least six editions, and is one of the thousand most widely held library items according to the OCLC). Barzun did not disdain popular culture: his varied interests included
detective fiction and
baseball. His widely quoted statement, "Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had better learn baseball." was inscribed on a plaque at the
Baseball Hall of Fame. He edited and wrote the introduction to the 1961 anthology,
The Delights of Detection, which included stories by
G. K. Chesterton,
Dorothy L. Sayers,
Rex Stout, and others. In 1971, Barzun co-authored (with Wendell Hertig Taylor), ''
A Catalogue of Crime: Being a Reader's Guide to the Literature of Mystery, Detection, & Related Genres'', for which he and his co-author received a Special
Edgar Award from the
Mystery Writers of America the following year. Barzun was also an advocate of
supernatural fiction, and wrote the introduction to
The Penguin Encyclopedia of Horror and the Supernatural. Barzun was a proponent of the theatre critic and diarist
James Agate, whom he compared in stature to
Samuel Pepys. Barzun edited Agate's last two diaries into a new edition in 1951 and wrote an informative introductory essay, "Agate and His Nine Egos". Jacques Barzun continued to write on education and cultural history after retiring from Columbia. At 84 years of age, he began writing his
swan song, to which he devoted the better part of the 1990s. The resulting book of more than 800 pages,
From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present, revealed a vast erudition and brilliance undimmed by advanced age. Historians, literary critics, and popular reviewers all lauded
From Dawn to Decadence as a sweeping and powerful survey of modern Western history, and it became a
New York Times bestseller. With this work he gained an international reputation. Reviewing it in the
New York Times, historian
William Everdell called the book "a great achievement" by a scholar "undiminished in his scholarship, research and polymathic interests," while also scrutinizing Barzun's scant treatment of figures like
Walt Whitman and
Karl Marx. The book introduces several novel
typographic devices that aid an unusually rich system of cross-referencing and help keep many strands of thought in the book under organized control. Most pages feature a
sidebar containing a pithy quotation, usually little known, and often surprising or humorous, from some author or historical figure. In 2007, Barzun commented that "Old age is like learning a new profession. And not one of your own choosing." As late as October 2011, one month before his 104th birthday, he reviewed
Adam Kirsch's
Why Trilling Matters for the
Wall Street Journal. In his philosophy of writing history, Barzun emphasized the role of storytelling over the use of academic jargon and detached analysis. He concluded in
From Dawn to Decadence that "history cannot be a science; it is the very opposite, in that its interest resides in the particulars". ==Recognition==