is arranged like the hexagons in this tiling If a circle is inscribed in each hexagon, the resulting figure is the densest way to
arrange circles in two dimensions; its
packing density is \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{3}} \approx 0.907 . The
honeycomb theorem states that hexagonal tiling is the best way to divide a surface into regions of equal area with the least total perimeter. The optimal three-dimensional structure for making honeycomb (or rather, soap bubbles) was investigated by
Lord Kelvin, who believed that the Kelvin structure (or
body-centered cubic lattice) is optimal. However, the less regular
Weaire–Phelan structure is slightly better. The hexagonal tiling is commonly found in nature, such as the sheet of
graphene with strong covalent carbon bonds. Tubular graphene sheets have been synthesised, known as
carbon nanotubes. File: File:| File: File:Carbon nanotube zigzag povray.PNG|A
carbon nanotube can be seen as a hexagon tiling on a
cylindrical surface File:Tile (AM 1955.117-1).jpg|alt=Hexagonal tile with blue bird and flowers|Hexagonal Persian tile File:Hex pavers sliding to Hudson W60 jeh.jpg|Hexagonal
trylinka pavement crumbling in New York The hexagonal tiling appears in many crystals. In three dimensions, the
face-centered cubic and
hexagonal close packing are common crystal structures. They are the densest sphere packings in three dimensions. Structurally, they comprise parallel layers of hexagonal tilings, similar to the structure of graphite. They differ in the way that the layers are staggered from each other, with the face-centered cubic being the more regular of the two. Pure
copper, amongst other materials, forms a face-centered cubic lattice. == Uniform colorings ==