While Black sets up the Hippopotamus structure White is able to develop freely. If White proceeds in accordance with principles a position will arise similar to that shown in the diagram. Black has adopted the complete Hippopotamus setup with pawns on a6, b6, d6, e6, g6 and h6, fianchettoed bishops on b7 and g7, and knights on d7 and e7. White, meanwhile, has occupied the centre with pawns, developed the minor pieces to central positions, castled and centralised rooks. Despite having achieved an ideal classical development White now faces a dilemma in terms of how to proceed, as Black has pawn control of every square on the fifth rank (a5–h5). White can thus only make headway by advancing a pawn into Black’s side of the board.
Pawn structure types If White should advance e4–e5, Black will typically lock the central pawns with ...d6–d5. This gives rise to a central similar to that seen in many lines of the
French Defence. Black will then proceed with the typical French ...c7–c5 and thematic queenside play. Returning to the diagram position, if White should instead advance d4–d5, Black will again respond by locking the central pawns, this time with ...e6–e5. The structure then resembles that seen in many lines of the
King's Indian Defence. Black will likely proceed with either (a) the thematic King’s Indian pawn break ...f7–f5 (usually following ...0-0), or (b) the typical Hippo idea of ...g6–g5 and ...Ne7–g6–f4, either of which plans may result in a kingside attack. Note that in positions where White intends to play d4–d5 the White queen would usually be deployed to d2 rather than e2 (thus avoiding the possibility of Black
doubling White's pawns by responding to d4–d5 with ...Bg7xNc3). If White opts against playing either e4–e5 or d4–d5, Black may begin to advance against the castled White king with moves such as ...g6–g5, ...Ng6, etc. (or, if White had castled queenside, ...b6–b5, ...Nb6, etc.). Alternatively Black might play the pawn break ...c7–c5, after which the structure may transform to resemble a
Sicilian (following a later ...c5xd4 or d4xc5) or a
Benoni (following a later d4–d5). To allow the various options given above, Black’s main objective in the early stages will be to remain flexible, including by delaying any decision about until after the central pawn structure has been defined. The Hippopotamus can be considered an anti-
theory opening, with Black’s play tending to rely on a thematic understanding of the major chess openings mentioned above rather than on specific opening variations or move orders. The positions arising from the Hippopotamus differ from standard positions in the French Defence, King's Indian Defence, etc., as various pawns and pieces will be displaced compared to their usual positions in those openings. For example, in the King's Indian, Black would not have fianchettoed the queen's bishop, and White would prefer to have the c-pawn on c4 rather than c2. Hippopotamus middlegames are often defined by how the players navigate these differences and attempt to turn them to their own advantage or their opponent's disadvantage. While White can be expected to obtain a space advantage in most variations of the Hippopotamus Defence, Black will often have a practical advantage due to greater familiarity with the various transpositional possibilities in this rare opening complex. White must also be wary of playing in too aggressive a fashion or of overextending, after which the dynamism of Black's seemingly passive structure may quickly become apparent (see, for example, Barczay vs. Ivkov, below). ==Illustrative games==