Austrian orbit of influence After becoming a free city, Trieste had to face new and increasingly powerful pressures, of both military and economic nature, from the
Republic of Venice, which sought to impose its
hegemony in the
Adriatic Sea. The disproportion in terms of demographics, financial and military means between the two cities portended Trieste's rapid fall under Venetian influence and the loss of its independence as had already happened previously in many
Istrian and
Dalmatian urban centres. In 1368, yet another dispute with Venice resulted in a Venetian which lasted 11 months, and the occupation of Trieste by the Venetians from November 1369 to June 1380. The constant struggle to resist Venetian influence eventually led the city to place itself under the protection of the
Duchy of Austria who was committed to respecting and protecting the integrity and civic freedom of Trieste (the latter were largely downsized from the second half of the 18th century).
Creation of the free port and city development In 1719
Charles VI of
Habsburg created in Trieste a free port whose privileges were extended during the reign of his
successor, before the District Chamber (1747), then to the entire city (1769). After the emperor's death (in 1740) the young
Maria Theresa of Austria acceded the throne, and thanks to a careful economic policy enabled the city to become one of the main European ports and the biggest in the Empire. The Theresian government invested considerable capital in expanding and upgrading the city port. Between 1758 and 1769 preparation for defense buildings were made, and a fort was created. In the immediate vicinity of the port rose the Stock Exchange (inside the Municipal Palace, around 1755), the Palace of the Lieutenancy (1764), as well as a department store and the first shipyard in Trieste, known as the shipyard of Saint Nicholas. In those years began to be built new , which still bears the name of the Empress, to accommodate the increasing population of the city that would reach about 30,000 inhabitants by the end of the century, six times greater than that in the hundred years before. The significant population growth of the city was due, for the most part, the arrival of numerous immigrants coming mainly from the
Adriatic Basin (
Venetian Istria,
Dalmatia,
Friuli,
Slovenia) and, to a lesser extent, from continental Europe (
Austria,
Hungary) and the
Balkans (
Serbia,
Greece, etc.).
Serbs settled in Trieste largely during the 18th and 19th centuries, mostly from
Herzegovina and
Bay of Kotor. Though initially small in number, they soon formed an influential and rich community within the city. A number of Serb traders owned important business and had built palaces across Trieste, many of which still stand. Trieste was occupied three times by the troops of
Napoleon, in 1797, in 1805 and 1809, in these short periods the city lost the ancient autonomy with the consequent suspension of the free port status. The first French occupation was very brief, beginning in March 1797 and lasting only two months. A large part of the population had abandoned in the city owing to the imminent arrival of Napoleon's troops, however the Napoleonic government proved to be less revolutionary than the citizens expected, with many returning to the city over the following days. Napoleon himself visited Trieste on April 29 and his troops left the city in may following the
Peace of Leoben. The second French occupation lasted from December 1805 until March 1806. Despite the short duration of the first two occupations the democratic ideas brought by the French troops began spreading in Trieste which began developing an Italian identity. The third occupation began on the 17th of May 1809 and starting from the 15th of October Trieste was annexed to the
Illyrian Provinces. This occupation ended on the 8th of November 1813 when Trieste was captured by the Habsburgs at the end of the
Siege of Trieste. Under the Habsburgs Trieste continued to grow, thanks to the opening of the
Austrian Southern Railway in 1857. In the 1860s it was elevated to the rank of the state capital of the
Austrian Littoral region (Oesterreichisches Küstenland). In the last decades of the 19th century the city became the fourth biggest urban area in the Austro-Hungarian Empire (after
Vienna,
Budapest and
Prague). Commercial and industrial development of the city in the second half of the nineteenth century and the first 15 years of the next century (30,000 employees in the secondary sector in 1910) led to the birth and development of some pockets of social exclusion. Trieste at the time had a high infant mortality, higher than that of the Italian cities and one of the highest
tuberculosis rates in Europe. Those factors further deepened the already increasing gap between the countryside, populated mostly by ethnic Slovenes, and the city proper, with its Italian language and traditions.
Ethnic and linguistic groups in the Habsburg age In the
Middle Ages and up to the early 19th century inhabitants of Trieste spoke the , a
Rhaeto-Romance dialect, although the primary language used for all official purposes and in culture was Latin throughout the Middle Ages. At end of the medieval period (14th and 15th centuries) usage of Italian language started to spread (although spoken as mother tongue, by a small minority of people in Trieste), and later still, in the latter part of the 18th century, German became more widely used, although it was confined to the purely administrative sphere. After the establishment of the free port and the beginning of the great migration that began in the 18th century, demographic changes intensified further in the next century (with a clear predominance of the Venetians, Dalmatians, Istrians, Friuli and Slovenes), and Tergestina gradually lost ground to
Venetian language. If the first is imposed primarily as a written language and culture, the second spread, between the last decades of the 18th and early 19th century as a real
lingua franca in Trieste. Among linguistic minorities acquired considerable weight in the city in the second half of the 19th century, the Slovenian (present in
Carso since medieval times), that on the eve of
First World War represented about a fourth of the total population of the municipality. Thanks to its privileged status as the only important commercial port in Austria, Trieste continued always to maintain its close cultural and linguistic ties with Italy and despite German being the official language, by the late Habsburg period Italian became the dominant language in all formal contexts, including business (both on the stock market and in private transactions), education (in 1861 an Italian school was opened by the city, joined to the existing Austro-German school), written notice (the vast majority of publications and papers were written in Italian), finding its own space even in the municipal council (the political class in Trieste was mostly Italian-speaking). According to the contested Austrian census of 1910, out of a total of 229,510 inhabitants of the city of Trieste (also including a number of locations in the centre and surrounding plateau) occurred as a result of the revision, the following distribution on the base of the tongue of use: • 118,959 (51.8%) spoke Italian • 56,916 (24.8%) spoke Slovenian • 11,856 (5.2%) spoke German • 2,403 (1.0%) spoke
Serbo-Croatian • 779 (0.3%) spoke other languages • 38,597 (16.8%) were foreign nationals who had not been asked for the language of use, including: • 29,639 (12.9%) were Italian citizens • 3,773 (1.6%) were
Hungarian citizens. Of the total population surveyed, well 98,872 inhabitants (43%) were not born in the municipality of Trieste but in other territories placed under Austrian sovereignty (71,940 registered inhabitants, i.e. 31.3%) or abroad (26,842 registered inhabitants, 11.7%). Among the latter the most part was born in the
Kingdom of Italy (the "subjects of the Kingdom") and, among the first, the most numerous colonies came from
Gorizia and
Gradisca (22,192 registered inhabitants), from
Istria (20,285 inhabitants surveyed),
Carniola (11,423 registered inhabitants) and
Dalmatia (5,110 registered inhabitants).
Trieste from 1861 to World War I The national contrasts The political and national struggles of Trieste in the period between 1861 and 1918 were the subject of a large series of studies by historians of different nationalities. The interpretations and
historiographical visions of this period are not always consistent with each other and the debate remains open, at least in a number of aspects and problems. It appears undeniable that was sixty years marked by strong tensions. highlights, in this period the dual action of defence put forward by the Italian-speaking population, and in relation to the Viennese bureaucratic
centralism, both against the spread of the
Slav population. The two phenomena, in fact, especially during the second
Taaffe ministry (1879–1893) were sometimes concurrent, since the central government considered the most reliable Slavs. At the time it was a widespread fact that the so-called
Austro-Slavism, a political trend by which the Slavic-speaking populations aimed to achieve its national objectives within the Habsburg regime and with his own cooperation.
Government policies towards Trieste The dynamic city of Trieste in this period was found to be conditioned by the different policies adopted by the central Viennese power towards the local institutions and the national question. As early as February 1861 the imperial government had issued a license that reduced the autonomy of individual diets, with the aim to proceed to a centralization and Germanization of the administration of the empire. The decision provoked reactions in Trieste, from which came the request to ensure the autonomy of the city, which observed its Italian ethnic character. This centralist policy was accompanied, especially after the
Third Italian War of Independence of 1866 and, in general, the process of creation of the Italian state, by a general distrust or hostility toward Italian ethnic populations present in the empire, and their faithfulness to the Austrian State and the Habsburg dynasty: "the events of 1866 strengthened in many Austrian politicians (among military leaders, conservative aristocracy and the imperial family) old suspicion of unfealty and the dangerousness of the Italian element for the Empire. [...] After 1866 the distrust of the conservative sectors of the ruling class towards Italians began to result in deliberate hostility. "
Emperor Franz Joseph, in his
Privy Council of 12 November 1866, a few months after the end of the
Third War of Italian Independence and its annexation of the
Veneto and
Friuli to the highest part of the
Kingdom of Italy, imposed a policy to "... Germanise and Slavonians in the strongest terms and without scruple ...» all Italian regions still part of his empire:
Trentino,
Dalmatia,
Venezia Giulia. The minutes of the Habsburg Council of Ministers of 12 November 1866, with the directives of "Germanization and
Slavonians", is well known by historians, who have frequently cited it in their works. It is reported by a number of independent essays among them, made by scholars from different countries and in different years, which have provided different interpretations on the possible outcomes and applications. Writes historian Luciano Monzali: "The minutes of the Council of Ministers of the Habsburg end of 1866 show the intensity of the hostility anti-Italian emperor and the nature of its political guidelines in this regard. Franz Joseph was converted fully to the idea of the general element infidelity Italian and Italian-speaking towards the Habsburg dynasty in the Council of Ministers, November 2, 1866, he gave strict orders to oppose the influence of decisive way ' Italian element still present in some Kronländer, and aim for Germanization or slavicized, depending on the circumstances, of the areas in question with all the energy and without any regard [...] all central authorities were ordered to do so systematically . These anti-Italian sentiments expressed by the emperor, who would have had serious political consequences [...] in the following years, they were also particularly prominent in the army, which had fought many wars in Italy and was eager for revenge: considered the preponderant role of the military [... ], it was extremely dangerous. " so it was designed and developed the "... floor of the Austrian conservative ruling class to pursue a policy of concessions to the
slavic nationalities, considered most loyal to the Empire and prepared to accept the power dominant Habsburg emperor and aristocracy. " that would also have included Trieste and the Austrian Littoral. Indeed, it was the will of the Austrian Government '... to weaken the powers and the political and economic strength of the city of Trieste controlled by the national-liberal Italian, rightly considering the heart of the national liberalism in Austria and
irredentist tendencies". This also included the severing of "... close political, cultural and social among liberals Trieste and Italy.."
The school problem An issue that aroused strong interest and sometimes great passions was schooling, because teaching was seen as an essential form of transmission and preservation of national culture. The imperial educational system was quite complex and differentiated, as it was intended for a multiplicity of ethnic groups enclosed in the same state. Simplifying for brevity, you can present the following distinction for the city of Trieste in the period: there were primary schools where teaching was held in familiar language (paternal or maternal language) or better in the so-called endeavoured use of language routinely by students, but who foresaw the obligation of German as a second language; then there were secondary schools, which had as a teaching language either the language used by the majority of the population and by the educated class and business (Italian) or the official and administrative language of the empire (German). The complexity was increased by the existence of state and municipal schools, institutions with parallel sections with a different language of instruction and again by the substantial number of hours spent in some institutions in certain languages (Italian, German,
Slovenian), but as a matter of ' learning rather than as the language of instruction. The imperial authorities tried to spread as much as possible to teaching in German and, in part, also Slovenian. The same textbooks were subjected to strict censorship, with some paradoxical results, such as the study of Italian literature using texts translated from German or the prohibition on the study of the history of Trieste, because it was deemed "too Italian". For these reasons, the Italian National League had, among its main objectives, the promotion of scholarly and educational institutions for the cultural defence of the Italian ethnic group. In Trieste, between 10 and 12 July 1868, there were demonstrations for academic freedom following a petition signed by 5,858 citizens and presented to the city council, which demanded the right to use the Italian language in state schools. These demonstrations degenerated into clashes and violence in the main city streets, with local Slovenes enlisted among the Habsburg soldiers, which caused the death of student Rodolfo Parisi, killed after being stabbed 26 times by bayonets and of two workers Sussa Francis and Nicholas Zecchia. It should be remembered that there were even more violent clashes. In 1914 there was a slight scuffle at the High School of Commerce Pasquale Revoltella between Italian and Slavic students, tied to a language issue. The Slovenian
Balcan university society intervened, in theory in protest, so a few days later (13 March 1914) there were other far more severe clashes, which caused the death of an Italian student hit by a bullet during a shooting. Another point of school problem which caused bitter divisions was the request to allow the establishment of an Italian university in Trieste. The question had been put forward since 1848 and had become more pressing after 1866, since students from Trieste (and in general Italians who were subjects of the empire) saw a border placed between them and the Italian universities of Padua, where they previously went to study. The Austrian state in principle recognized the legitimacy of the request to establish an Italian university in Trieste, but denied the concession for fear of displeasing the Slovenian group or to see it put forward a similar request and because it foresaw that such a centre of culture and studies would eventually strengthen the
Italian irredentism.
The labour issue The large urban, industrial and commercial centre of Trieste attracted an intense migratory movement from neighboring regions, both from the empire, and the Italian state. Thus arrived in the city of Trieste immigrants of many nationalities, but principally Italians and Southern Slavs. Fears arose in the Italian community that the empire favoured the immigration of Slavs over Italians. However, the Slav migratory movement towards Trieste was principally driven by socio-economic reasons. Slovenes more easily found work in public service in a mixed-language zone for linguistic reasons and they were often well received by the Italian employers in sectors ranging from industrial to domestic work. points out that the distrust of the imperial authorities towards immigrant Italians was due to the fact that they were citizens of a foreign state. One must add, however, as recognized by Angelo Ara, that "undoubtedly there existed an imperial interest in strengthening the South-Slavic component, considered most loyal and" centripetal "of the Italian": this attitude was, for example, recognized by the Governor Hohenlohe in an official document. Sestan notes for his part as the Austrian authorities would promote the Slavic migration from rural regions of Slovenia and Croatia and at the same time impeding the migratory movement of Italians from the kingdom. The imperial authorities showed themselves wary of the subjects of the Kingdom were easily driven to implement expulsion measures against them, "citizenship of the Kingdom of Italy [...] was sufficient motive for the Austrian authorities to make use of force when they believe appropriate, intervening with measures of forced eviction, with the most trivial pretexts; about 35,000 subjects of the Kingdom of Italy would be expelled in the decade from 1903 to 1913, up to the decrees of the lieutenant of Trieste
Prince Konrad of Hohenlohe-Schillingsfürst. The rapid grow of the Slavic population in Trieste at the beginning of the twentieth century was then due to both social and economic reasons owing to the politics of the empire and Hohenlohe (a sympathizer of
Trialism). The consequence, however, was that the Trieste city saw its Italianness eroded Slavic immigration, without the Italian population being able to see similar demographic growth. Despite the protests widening to involve other categories of workers, eventually involving all of the city, the company did not move on its position. On 15 February, after the news that Lloyd would put it itself to an arbitration panel. 3000 protesters went from a
socialist meeting at
Politeama Rossetti towards the centre to celebrate. Once they reached the demonstrators were stopped by the men of the 55th infantry brigade under the command of
Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf, which started shooting and charging at the crowd with their bayonets. Over 200 demonstrators were injured with 14 killed. In the following days the arbitration panel granted two of the three demands.
National Contrasts The politics of Trieste in the period between 1861 and 1918 have been the subject of a large number of studies by historians of different nationalities. The interpretations and
historiographic visions of this period are not always in agreement with one another, and the debate remains open. It is however undeniable that the period was marked by strong tensions. both against the bureaucratic Viennese centralism and the diffusion of
Austro-Slavism. The two phenomena were combined during the
Taaffe Ministry (1879–1893) as the central government saw the Slavic population as more reliable.
Irredentism and the Great War (1897 map) The directives of the Habsburg imperial government promoted a series repressive and discriminatory measures to the detriment of the Italian population of Trieste. However, they contributed in important ways to the spread of
Irredentist ideas within the Italian community who felt its very existence under threat by the joint action of the Austrian Government and the local Slavic nationalists. border. Trieste was, with
Trento, both a subject and center of irredentism, a movement that, in the last decades of the nineteenth century and early twentieth aspired to the annexation of the cities to Italy. The drivers of irredentism in Trieste were mostly bourgeois rising classes (including the wealthy Jewish colony), whose potential and political aspirations could not be satisfied in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The Slovene ethnic group was in the city of Trieste in the early twentieth century in demographic, social and economic growth, and, according to the controversial census of 1910, was about a quarter of the entire population. Irredentism therefore assumed, in the Julian city, the characters often markedly anti-Slavs that were embodied by the figure of . The first martyr for this movement is Trieste's,
Guglielmo Oberdan, who was triad and hanged in Trieste on 20 December 1882 for plotting to kill Emperor Franz Joseph. Close to the Italian irredentist movement and perceived as such by the Austrian authorities, was the aforementioned
National League, the largest private organization in Trieste at the time, which grew to 11,569 members in 1912. On 23 May 1915, after the news of the
Italian declaration of war on Austro-Hungary, pro-Austrian demonstrators, set fire to the headquarters of the National League,
Palazzo Tonello, which house the editorial office of the irredentist newspaper "
Il Piccolo" and the building of the irredentist sports association
Società Ginnastica Triestina. of Italian troops in Trieste on 3 November 1918 At the outbreak of World War I, 128 men of Trieste refused to fight under the Austro-Hungarian flags, and immediately following the Italian entry into the war against the
Central Powers, they enlisted in the royal army. Among the volunteers who lost their lives during the conflict, are the writers and intellectuals
Scipio Slataper, and
Carlo Stuparich, brother of the more famous
Giani. Particularly active in terms of ideas and propaganda were the escapees from Trieste in Italy and France, where he played a major role in the foundation, in Rome, of the Central Committee of the Upper Adriatic propaganda (1916) and, in Paris, of the association
Italia irredenta. All members of the governing bodies of the committee were from Trieste, with the exception of the Dalmatian
Alessandro Dudan. Between 1915 and 1917, Italian aviation bombed the city on numerous occasions, causing many victims among the civilian population. Estimates indicate that around 50000 Italian speaking citizens of the
Austrian Littoral fought for
Austria-Hungary between 1914 and 1918. On November 3, 1918, Italian troops entered finally in Trieste, met with overwhelming enthusiasm. "Almost the entire Italian population was in the street waiting liberators. Italian Army witnesses recall with emotion the enveloping embrace of Trieste, noting even the appearance gaunt and subdued crowd, submitted for the whole duration of the war to the same deprivations of Austria's population. "
Annexation to Italy in the period 1922–1947; the borders do not correspond to the those of the time as they are drawn based on current administrative divisions. In that same month of November (1918), at the end of the First World War, Trieste was occupied by the
Royal Italian Army under the command of general
Carlo Petitti di Roreto. The formal annexation of the city and
Venezia Giulia, however, came only two years later, between November 1920 and January 1921, when it became effective with the
Treaty of Rapallo. With the annexation, the importance of the Julian metropolis was somewhat diminished: Trieste became a border city with a much more limited hinterland than in the past. Its port had also lost the potential user base that had led to its development consisting of the entire Austro-Hungarian Empire, which had
dissolved following the war. To at least partially mitigate these difficulties, the Italian state put in place a policy of economic assistance towards the city and its province, initiated by the
government of
Giovanni Giolitti (1920–1921), it lasted throughout the
fascist period (1922–1943). The main effort was made to support the industrial sector, which legislators intended to replace the port and commercial activities related to it as the main drivers of the economy of Trieste. In 1923, Trieste was chosen as the capital of the
Province of Trieste. ==Fascism==