Funding In 1981, the New York City government was not prepared to deal with this health emergency, as the city was just recovering from the
fiscal crisis of the 1970s, when Mayor
Ed Koch took office. At the beginning of the epidemic there was no funding from either federal or city government. As Jonathan M. Soffer argues, "the ultimate blame for devastation of the city in the 1970s lies in Washington and the anti-urban administrations of
Gerald Ford,
Jimmy Carter, and
Ronald Reagan." Only in the late 1980s did the city government fully put forth an effort to address the issue. This was largely because
Health Commissioner Stephen Joseph took office in 1985, replacing David Judson Sencer, who was criticized for not taking action during his term. There were individuals such as
Larry Kramer, one of the organizers of GMHC, who were outspoken about their dislike towards Mayor Koch and his office, especially in regards to Sencer. Kramer even claimed that "the mayor of New York is helping to kill us." Judge Joseph Lisa who was on the City Council claimed there was no active effort to respond to the spread of the disease from the Health Commissioner until Sencer stepped down and Joseph took over: "he [Sencer] wasn't, in my opinion, the kind of health commissioner that we needed in the epidemic. Joseph, on the other hand, was much stronger." Joseph was responsible for beginning of the
Needle Exchange Program, even though many civic groups were against the idea: the police, black community leadership, even the publisher of the
New York Amsterdam News, who declared that "when the first needle is given out, Joseph should be arrested for murder." Thus the government's role during the AIDS crisis was seen as being more reactive than proactive, as described by members of the medical community such as Jo Ivey Boufford, who saw that very few programs were being funded for AIDS prevention. When Boufford became president of the NYC Health and Hospitals Commission in 1985, five years after the AIDS crisis had hit New York City, her first task was to develop a primary care strategy for AIDS patients. Boufford's team encountered several problems: since governmental involvement had been delayed, doctors had to deal with terminally ill patients; the disease was still being viewed as a homosexual disease, so prevention and advertising was very limited; perhaps most importantly, funds were being used reactively instead of proactively. On June 17, 1985, a meeting with voluntary hospitals was held to establish joint procedures for working with AIDS patients. The HHC began employee training programs, and created videos, discussions guides and booklets. The HHC also established protective guidelines for employees. When Judge Hyman made his decision, he approved the policy that CWA were not to be excluded from attending school, while scrutinizing the policy as a "secret". He further criticized the medical field as professionally irresponsible for causing mass hysteria. Frederick A.O Schwarz, Jr., whom was the City Corporation Counsel, defended the City's policymakers because they "acted in a way that reflected the pressure of time." When the program started, New York City police commissioner Ben Ward sought to avert police harassment of drug users making Joseph's intent of AIDS prevention known to police precincts. Development of these programs were slowed by opposition from a range of government officials and communities and Commissioner Ward later suggested the possibility of unethical practices that recalled the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. Joseph credited activists such as
Yolanda Serrano, the head of the Association for Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment (ADAPT) for calling attention to how the problem of addiction was far less dire than the overwhelming number of deaths from the rapidly spreading AIDS epidemic.
Housing The housing needs of New Yorkers were also seriously affected by the HIV crisis. For example,
Mayor Dinkins who was previously Manhattan Borough President, intended to place people with HIV/AIDS into city-run shelters, not permanent housing as he had promised earlier. However given the gravity of the health and social needs of people with HIV, the City Council urged Mayor Dinkins to establish dedicated services. Despite the ruling of United 21 et al vs City of New York, which repealed Mayor Koch's Executive Order 50 on affirmative action, the Council also called on teaming with religious communities and other city agencies in order to establish residences for people with HIV/AIDS as they were regularly segregated in hospitals and did not receive adequate care. Mayor
Edward Koch, Dinkins' predecessor, realized the need for housing for people with HIV/AIDS. However, he did face opposition by some anti-homelessness nonprofit organizations. Nonetheless, Koch wanted to utilize federal funds from HUD to establish homes especially for people with HIV/AIDS. He did reach out to nonprofits despite the opposition in order to find suitable places or residences. In the meanwhile to address the rising foster child crisis, Koch created a rent subsidy program for those housing foster children as he established HIV testing program for such children. On top of the desperate need for raising wages for health care workers, there was also the persistent need for funding hospitals. Mayor Koch raised rates for 24-hour home care attendants through the Board of Estimate because the NYC Human Resources Administration was unwilling to regulate contractual labor agreements. Mayor Koch increased wages by 20%, with weekend employees having the largest increase. With the building of new dedicated housing for people with HIV/AIDS, the increase would have employed more home health aides. This was made possible with the reimbursement by New York State and Federal governments. Meanwhile, Deputy Mayor
Brezenoff assured the
future Mayor Dinkins that the City's
in rem program would allow the City to house households and people with HIV/AIDS. Dinkins welcomed the news, but however, requested that families are given first consideration and to double what was allotted. Koch then assured Dinkins that the City will reimburse health assisted housing and at-home nursing programs in order to made sure that housing was first stable before building new ones. In addition to the promise and demand of using more in rem properties converted into permanent housing, there was the issue of decaying buildings and management needed to address them. Besides using in-rem properties, the City received proposals by not-for-profits in order to house people with AIDS. This included, in one example, a conversion of a mansion into a facility to assist children with AIDS being housed with their parents, hospice care, and group residency within one property. There were also further calls for using hotel accommodations for single adults who did not require hospitalization. == Comparison with San Francisco ==