In 1994,
Neal Ascherson said of Hobsbawm: "No historian now writing in English can match his overwhelming command of fact and source. But the key word is 'command'. Hobsbawm's capacity to store and retrieve detail has now reached a scale normally approached only by large archives with big staffs".
Ian Kershaw said that Hobsbawm's take on the twentieth century, his 1994 book,
The Age of Extremes, consisted of "masterly analysis". Meanwhile,
Tony Judt, while praising Hobsbawm's vast knowledge and graceful prose, cautioned that Hobsbawm's bias in favour of the
USSR,
communist states and communism in general, and his tendency to disparage any nationalist movement as passing and irrational, weakened his grasp of parts of the 20th century. After reading
Age of Extremes, Kremlinologist
Robert Conquest concluded that Hobsbawm suffers from a "massive reality denial" regarding the USSR, The following year, when asked the same question on
BBC Radio 4's
Desert Island Discs, if "the sacrifice of millions of lives" would have been worth the future communist society, he replied: "That's what we felt when we fought the Second World War". He repeated what he had already said to Ignatieff, when he asked the
rhetorical question, "Do people now say we shouldn't have had
World War II, because more people died in World War II than died in Stalin's terror?".
Tony Judt was of the opinion that Hobsbawm "clings to a pernicious illusion of the late Enlightenment: that if one can promise a benevolent outcome it would be worth the human cost. But one of the great lessons of the 20th century is that it's not true. For such a clear-headed writer, he appears blind to the sheer scale of the price paid. I find it tragic, rather than disgraceful." Neil Ascherson believes that, "Eric is not a man for apologising or feeling guilty. He does feel bad about the appalling waste of lives in Soviet communism. But he refuses to acknowledge that he regrets anything. He's not that kind of person." Hobsbawm himself, in his autobiography, wrote that he desires "historical understanding ... not agreement, approval or sympathy". The 1930s aside, Hobsbawm was criticised for never relinquishing his Communist Party membership. Whereas people like
Arthur Koestler left the Party after seeing the friendly reception of Nazi foreign minister
Joachim von Ribbentrop in
Moscow during the years of the
Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact (1939–1941), Hobsbawm stood firm even after the Soviet interventions of the
Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the
Prague Spring. Hobsbawm let his membership lapse not long before the party's dissolution in 1991. In his memoirs, Hobsbawm wrote: "The dream of the
October Revolution is still there somewhere inside me ... I have abandoned, nay, rejected it, but it has not been obliterated. To this day, I notice myself treating the memory and tradition of the USSR with an indulgence and tenderness." ==Personal life==