"Ape", from Old English
apa, is a word of uncertain origin. The term has a history of rather imprecise usage—and of comedic or punning usage in the vernacular. Its earliest meaning was generally of any non-human anthropoid primate, as is still the case for its cognates in other Germanic languages. Later, after the term "
monkey" had been introduced into English, "ape" was specialized to refer to a tailless (therefore exceptionally human-like) primate. Thus, the term "ape" obtained two different meanings, as shown in the 1911
Encyclopædia Britannica entry: it could be used as a synonym for "monkey" and it could denote the tailless human-like primate in particular. Some, or recently all, hominoids are also called "apes", but the term is used broadly and has several different senses within both popular and scientific settings. "Ape" has been used as a synonym for "monkey" or for naming any primate with a human-like appearance, particularly those without a tail. The term
hominins is also due to Gray (1824), intended as including the human lineage (see also Hominidae#Terminology,
Human taxonomy). The distinction between apes and monkeys is complicated by the traditional
paraphyly of monkeys: Apes emerged as a sister group of Old World Monkeys in the
catarrhines, which are a sister group of New World Monkeys. Therefore,
cladistically, apes, catarrhines and related contemporary extinct groups such as
Parapithecidae are monkeys as well, for any consistent definition of "monkey". "Old World monkey" may also legitimately be taken to be meant to include all the catarrhines, including apes and extinct species such as
Aegyptopithecus, in which case the apes, Cercopithecoidea and
Aegyptopithecus emerged within the Old World monkeys. The primates called "apes" today became known to Europeans after the 18th century. As zoological knowledge developed, it became clear that taillessness occurred in a number of different and otherwise distantly related
species. Sir
Wilfrid Le Gros Clark was one of those primatologists who developed the idea that there were trends in primate evolution and that the extant members of the order could be arranged in an "ascending series", leading from "monkeys" to "apes" to humans. Within this tradition "ape" came to refer to all members of the superfamily Hominoidea except humans. As such, this use of "apes" represented a
paraphyletic grouping, meaning that, even though all species of apes were descended from a common ancestor, this grouping did
not include all the descendant species, because humans were excluded from being among the apes. Traditionally, the English-language
vernacular name "apes" does not include humans, but phylogenetically, humans (
Homo) form part of the family Hominidae within Hominoidea. Thus, there are at least three common, or traditional, uses of the term "ape": non-specialists may not distinguish between "monkeys" and "apes", that is, they may use the two terms interchangeably; or they may use "ape" for any tailless monkey or non-human hominoid; or they may use the term "ape" to just mean the non-human hominoids. Modern taxonomy aims for the use of
monophyletic groups for taxonomic classification; Some literature may now use the common name "ape" to mean all members of the superfamily Hominoidea, including humans. For example, in his 2005 book, Benton wrote "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orang-utan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans". Modern biologists and primatologists refer to apes that are not human as "non-human" apes. Scientists broadly, other than paleoanthropologists, may use the term "
hominin" to identify
the human clade, replacing the term "
hominid". See
terminology of primate names. See below,
History of hominoid taxonomy, for a discussion of changes in scientific classification and terminology regarding hominoids. == Evolution ==