Unbalanced focus The HKDSE is criticised for placing too much emphasis on the four core subjects, causing some students to neglect the elective subjects.
Tsui Lap-chee, then president of the University of Hong Kong at the introduction of HKDSE, commented: "The Education Bureau demands universities [to screen pupils by] setting the so-called
3322 as minimum entry requirement for undergraduate programmes — aka a minimal of grade 3 in Chinese and English Languages, and a minimal of grade 2 in Mathematics and Liberal Studies. [It is] insufficient for studying in universities." He proposed a minimal grade requirement for two elective subjects, which the Education Bureau rejected. He also mentioned that many students do not study the optional extended modules for Mathematics, leaving them lacking the advanced mathematics knowledge needed for science and engineering studies; it is very difficult for them to make this up in their undergraduate courses.
Severely weakened higher mathematics education In the former secondary education system, students who were good at mathematics could take
Additional Mathematics in the HKCEE, and
Pure Mathematics and
Applied Mathematics in the HKALE, with syllabi in higher mathematics that were much more demanding than those in neighbouring regions such as mainland China and Taiwan. These subjects were treated as stand-alone subjects; they had equal teaching time as other subjects, and their grades were counted separately from the general Mathematics in HKCEE in university admission. The HKALE Pure Mathematics used to be required for application to undergraduate programmes in mathematics, physics and engineering, so that students would have a sufficient foundation in higher mathematics needed for these programmes. In the HKDSE, however, education in higher mathematics is reduced to part of Mathematics in the form of two extended modules. The extended modules do not have the status of separated elective subjects; they are only given half as much teaching time as an elective subject, and their syllabi are drastically axed. Classes for the extended modules are often scheduled outside of regular school hours. Also, many university programmes, including medicine and law, which are regarded as "elite programmes" in Hong Kong, only consider the extended modules as a part of the core Mathematics subject for admission, meaning that applicants will receive extra credits only if they get higher grade in an extended module than in the easier compulsory part. These lead to a sharp decline of students taking higher mathematics in secondary schools; only 14% of students took the extended modules in 2016, whereas in the past 25% of students had taken the HKCEE Additional Mathematics. The science and engineering departments in universities are faced with struggling students who did not learn any calculus. The world-renowned mathematician
Shing-tung Yau has lambasted Hong Kong education for neglecting calculus, which hampers Hong Kong's development in mathematics and technology and diminishes Hong Kong's competitiveness in STEM fields. The
Hong Kong Academy of Sciences has called for proper recognition of higher mathematics education, highlighting the fact that Hong Kong has far lower proportion of students taking higher mathematics than neighbouring countries and regions. The Faculty of Engineering of the
Chinese University of Hong Kong has to lower its admission requirements due to weak basics in mathematics of prospective students, and some engineering professors have proposed a reform by scrapping the extended modules and introducing a proper subject in higher mathematics that would be set at the standard of the former HKALE Pure Mathematics and would be required for students applying to engineering. The proposal was put forward by Legislator
Michael Tien to the then Secretary for Education
Yeung Yun-hung, which he did not respond directly.
Hindrance to admission Since the launch of the HKDSE, the Chinese language paper is often dubbed the "paper of death" (). Some have the opinion that the high expectation is well-founded since it is the main language used in daily life in Hong Kong, but every year nearly half of all candidates fail the subject. They hence lose the chance to gain entrance to a university because of the obligatory "3322" requirement, even though tertiary education in Hong Kong is delivered in English. “3322” refers to level 3 for Chinese Language and English Language and level 2 for Mathematics Compulsory Part and Liberal Studies, compared to the past when language subjects were not compulsory at advanced level. It is also reported that some of the authors of passages employed in the Chinese papers themselves found the questions in the paper difficult or impossible to answer. Elaine Yau of SCMP commented that the exam results are "proving [HKDSE as] a major hindrance to admission". Moreover, it is reported that the HKDSE is causing chronic stress in students.
2020 arrangements due to the COVID-19 outbreak The spread of
COVID-19 in Hong Kong caused the Education Bureau (EDB) and HKEAA to remodel the 2020 HKDSE. At a press conference held on 6 February announcing the alternative plans, the Secretary for Education
Kevin Yeung said that all oral and practical examinations to be held before 27 March would be postponed. He went on further to mention two different options then considered by the Bureau and the HKEAA. One of them was that written exams would take place on 27 March as scheduled, whereas physical education, music practicals and Chinese speakings be postponed to May. Option two was that all examinations would be postponed by four weeks, as well as cancelling all oral examinations. At the end of February, the bureau announced that option one would be adopted where HKDSE would be held as scheduled on 27 March and Chinese oral exams would be postponed to 18 May. The result releasing date would also be postponed to 15 July. Some measures were made by the Bureau to prevent the chance of virus transmission, such as providing candidates with face masks and checking their body temperature. For those who could not attend HKDSE due to health conditions, their final grade of the subject can be determined based on school performance, but the maximum grade they can obtain would be level 5. In mid-March, after a spike in COVID-19 cases reported in Hong Kong, the secretary announced that the HKDSE would be postponed by a month to 27 April, as in the previously discussed option 2. Candidates expressed dissatisfaction over the new arrangements, demanding a cancellation of 2020 HKDSE. Some thought that with such a large number of candidates staying in a packed area for examination, the possibility of virus transmission would be high. Some also thought that the EDB should have made the call to postpone the exam earlier instead of just less than 2 weeks before the official exam date, which caused confusion and inconvenience to everyone concerned. In an interview with
Hong Kong Free Press, a candidate hoped that the bureau would be more transparent in their decision-making process in the future, as the uncertainty surrounding the new arrangement had caused more burden to candidates and made them more stressed about the public exam.
2020 HKDSE History exam controversy In May, over 5,000 students took the HKDSE History exam. The exam is divided into two papers, with the first paper consisting of four compulsory Data-Based Question and the second paper requiring the candidate to choose to attempt two out of the seven essay questions. Among the four questions in Paper 1, Question 2 is set on the topic of
Sino-Japanese relations during the first half of the 20th century. In part (c) of the question, which is also the third and the last sub-question, requires candidates to answer "Whether Japan did more good than harm to China between 1900 and 1945." based on the source provided and their own historical knowledge. A day after the exam, the EDB, the Hong Kong government officials, and major pro-establishment figures and legislators slammed the question for being "biased", "insensitive to the war crime victims who suffered from atrocities committed by the
Japanese Army during
Sino-Japanese War", and "hurting the pride and dignity of the 1.4 billion Chinese people". Hence, the government ordered the invalidation of the question. With the government intervention in the exam system, many candidates expressed their anger towards the government that the removal of the controversial question would unfairly affect their performance, and may also affect their admission into the local universities. A week later, the question was confirmed to be invalidated. Subsequently, a student group filed a judicial review to challenge the HKEAA decision to invalidate the question. Many pro-democracy figures believed the government intervention on the examination system reflected the Central government's growing influence in Hong Kong's local affairs. Many teachers from the pro-democracy
HKPTU expressed their concern about the eroding academic freedom. On the other hand, pro-establishment figures believed that the local education system was "toxic" and "brainwashing" to promote local young people to become more rebellious against the Central and SAR government. In view of this problem, the pro-establishment figures called for the education system to be reformed and remove any elements of colonialism in the education system that have existed over the past 23 years. ==See also==