The Taiwanese
Aviation Safety Council (ASC) led the investigation into the accident. The French
Bureau of Enquiry and Analysis for Civil Aviation Safety (BEA) represented the country of manufacture, and the
Transportation Safety Board of Canada represented the country of engine manufacture. Other parties to the investigation included the Taiwanese
Civil Aeronautics Administration, the operator (TransAsia), the aircraft (
ATR) and engine (
Pratt & Whitney Canada) manufacturers, and
Transport Canada. Whereas the crew reported a flameout, according to Wang, data showed the right engine had in fact been moved to idle power. while cautioning that the investigation was "too early to say if human error was a factor". Investigators released the following preliminary sequence of events:
Interim report The ASC issued an interim report on . Without assigning responsibility for the crash, the report confirmed that a still-functional engine number one was incorrectly shut down by the pilot following the failure of engine number two (right engine). The report also stated that the
pilot in command had failed to pass a simulator test in May 2014, partly because he demonstrated insufficient knowledge about the procedure for handling an engine flameout during takeoff. He retook the test the following month, however, and successfully passed. The ASC released a draft report in November 2015 and published the final version in July 2016. During the investigation, TransAsia Airways disclosed confidential information from the draft report to
Next magazine, which published a story in its issue of 11 May 2016. This was an attempt to influence the investigation into the accident. TransAsia Airways were fined
NT$3,000,000 (
US$92,000). ==Aftermath==