(measured by staff) found average flaccid, stretched, and erect lengths of , , and , respectively, and average flaccid and erect circumferences of and , respectively. Erect length in the studies was measured by pushing the pre-pubic fat pad to the bone, and flaccid or erect girth (circumference) was measured at the base or mid-shaft of the penis. Length of the flaccid penis does not necessarily correspond to length of the erect penis; some smaller flaccid penises grow much longer, while some larger flaccid penises grow comparatively less. This decrease of flaccid penis size is referred to by the slang term "shrinkage", due to action by the
cremaster muscle. The same phenomenon affects cyclists and exercise bike users, with prolonged pressure on the
perineum from the
bicycle saddle and the straining of the exercise causing the penis and scrotum to contract involuntarily. An incorrect saddle may ultimately cause
erectile dysfunction (see
crotch pressure for more information). Individuals with
hard flaccid syndrome or other
pelvic floor disorders may temporarily have an abnormally small penis.
Stretched Neither age or size of the flaccid penis accurately predicted erectile length. Stretched length has correlated with erect length in some cases. One study found that a minimal tension force of approximately 450 g during stretching of the penis was required to reach a full potential erection length. This study also found that tension forces exerted in this study by the urologist were shown to be significantly (P<0.01) lower than 450g. • A 2001 study of about 3,300 men found an average flaccid stretched length of . Checking for correlations in a random subset of the sample consisting of 325 men, they found a few statistically significant
Spearman's correlations: between flaccid length and height of 0.208, −0.140 with weight, and −0.238 with BMI, flaccid circumference and height 0.156, stretched length and height 0.221, weight −0.136, BMI −0.169.
Erect Scientific studies have been performed on the
erect length of the adult penis. Studies that have relied on self-measurement, including from Internet surveys, consistently reported a higher average length than those that used medical or scientific methods to obtain measurements. A 2020 review found most men believed the average erect penis length is more than 15.24 cm (6 inches). This inaccurate belief has likely been fed by inaccurate and exaggerated data presented in studies where the size of a participant's erect penis is self-reported. Participants may report overestimates of the size of their penis in the belief that a larger penis is more socially desirable.
Erect circumference Similar results exist regarding studies of the
circumference of the adult fully
erect penis, with the measurement usually taken mid-shaft.
Size in older men Age is not believed to negatively correlate with penis size. However, the
common misconception that overall hand size predicts penis size has been widely discredited.
Size and other body parts There is no correlation between
shoe size and stretched penis size. Nose size was highly related to stretched penile length in Japanese male
cadavers. There may be a link between the malformation of the genitalia and the human limbs. The development of the penis in an embryo is controlled by some of the same
Hox genes (in particular
HOXA13 and
HOXD13) as those that control the development of the limbs. Mutations of some Hox genes that control the growth of limbs cause malformed genitalia (
hand–foot–genital syndrome).
Obesity and perceived size Excess adipose tissue in the pubic region can obscure penile length, a condition known as buried penis. In such cases, the penis is of normal size but is partially or completely hidden by the surrounding fat pad. A cross-sectional study of 680 obese boys found that 30.88% had buried penis, while 9.12% met criteria for micropenis based on stretched penile length measurements. Standard clinical measurement of penile length involves pushing the pre-pubic fat pad to the pubic bone to obtain an accurate reading, distinguishing true penile length from apparent length.
Size, race, and ethnicity Alleged differences in races have led to the creation of
sexual myths. There is no scientific background to support the alleged "oversized" penis in black people. There is no indication that penis size differs between ethnicities. A 2024 meta-analysis of 34,060 Chinese men found that while flaccid penis length was shorter on average than the global reference population, erect length showed no statistically significant difference. The study found that Chinese men had a higher average increase from flaccid to erect state (67%) compared to the global average (43%), meaning a greater proportion fell into the category colloquially known as "growers" rather than "showers." The authors noted this has implications for older cross-population studies, many of which relied on flaccid rather than erect measurements: populations with more "growers" would appear smaller in flaccid-based datasets even when erect dimensions are comparable. While some meta-analyses have identified modest average differences across geographic regions, the variation in penis size within any racial or ethnic group vastly exceeds the differences between groups. Individual variation within any racial group spans over 7 cm (3 inches) in some datasets, a range that is 15 to 30 times greater than the alleged average differences between racial groups, which typically measure less than 0.5 cm (0.2 inches) in clinician-measured studies. Factually race is therefore a poor predictor of any individual's penis size, and reported racial averages do not account for the substantial overlap between group distributions.
Size preferences among sexual partners In a 1994 cover story by
Psychology Today, 1,500 readers (about two-thirds women) were surveyed about male body image. Many of the women were not particularly concerned with penis size, and over 71% thought men overemphasized the importance of penis size and shape. Generally, the women polled cared more about width than men thought, and less about length than men thought, although the strength of caring for either among women showed a similar pattern. A small study of 50 undergraduate women, surveyed by two popular male athletes on campus about their perceptions of sexual satisfaction; found the width of a penis feels better than the length of a penis, when subjects are asked to choose between the two (size was left unspecified). It was also concluded that this may show that penis size overall affects sexual satisfaction, since women chose between the two options they were given. A 2002 study at
Groningen University Hospital, asked 375 sexually active women (who had recently given birth) the importance of penis size. The results showed that 21% of women felt length was important and 32% felt that girth was important. A 2013 study conducted at the
Australian National University, showed that penis size influences a man's sex appeal, and the taller the man, the bigger the effect. The study showed life-sized 3D computer-generated images, altering the height and other physical attributes, with women typically registering preferences in under 3 seconds. A preference for taller men's larger penis size was indicated. A 2015 US study of the stated preferences of 75 women using
3D-printed models as references showed a preferred penis length of and a preferred circumference of for long-term sexual partners, with slightly larger preferred sizes of a length of and circumference of for one-time sexual encounters. Many studies measure length "bone pressed" where the pubic fat pad is compressed to give a larger measurement, but due to the methods the above numbers are effectively non "bone pressed". shown with diagrams of the female anatomy|365x365px According to the study, however, when estimating the length of their partner's penis, most women would say a size significantly smaller than what their partner was recorded to be. This suggests that perception of size is not entirely accurate. ==Biochemistry==