Vincent Canby of
The New York Times called
Ice "a very long (132 minutes), very intense, very self-satisfied movie that is also a curiously moving experience," concluding: "It is an awfully proud and humorless film, and although I can't say that I really like it, I do admire it, and I'd recommend it to anyone interested in politics or movies." Author Alan Rosenthal criticized
Ice for what he characterized as "naive emotional reasoning", writing that the film "substitutes dogmatic assertion in place of hard political argument." Melly, in his review of the film for
The Observer, wrote that, "although a thoughtful and indeed thought-provoking film, I couldn't really believe in it. The young revolutionaries were, as they say in the underground, 'beautiful,' but they offered little but slogans and gestures as an alternative to the status quo. The film showed up that terrible poverty of language which, in my view, is the flaw in current revolutionary practice. Ideas need words, more words than 'wow,' 'heavy' and 'too much.' There is the necessity to communicate if you are to convince. Idealism and violence are not in themselves enough." ==See also==