Denominational beliefs are strictly
Baptist. As
Christian fundamentalists, they believe in the
inspiration and
inerrancy of the Bible, and great emphasis is also placed on a
literal-historical interpretation of Scripture. Other common beliefs include
separation of church and state,
young Earth creationism (YEC),
cessationism, and
dispensationalism. In general, IFBs are opposed to
theological liberalism,
ecumenism,
Roman Catholicism, the
Charismatic movement, the
ordination of women pastors,
homosexuality, and
evolution.
Fundamentalism As
Christian fundamentalists, IFBs are opposed both to
liberal Christianity and neo-evangelicalism (which is particularly associated with
Billy Graham). IFBs believe that neo-evangelicalism errs by failing to practice separation sufficiently, rejecting its perceived
ecumenical attitudes in some modern evangelical circles.
King James Onlyism Many IFB churches adhere to only using the
King James Version of the Bible (KJV), a position known as "
King James Onlyism." David Cloud, an IFB author, drawing on the arguments of textual scholar and theologian
Edward Hills, asserts that the KJV should not be viewed simply as a translation of the Greek and Hebrew texts. Instead, he regards it as an independent edition of the
Textus Receptus itself, rendered in English rather than Greek, and providentially preserved as the purest form of the
Textus Receptus. The King James Only position was also advocated by notable IFB pastors such as Hyles and
Lester Roloff, who maintained that the King James Bible is the perfectly preserved the Word of God in English. Similarly,
Jack Chick, who was best known for his comic
tracts, also advocated a King James Only position. A more extreme form of King James Onlyism was developed by
Peter Ruckman, who argued that the KJV constitutes "new revelation" or "advanced revelation" and is superior to the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. However, some IFBs like Rice, Hutson,
Lee Roberson,
R. L. Hymers Jr., and others took a more moderate position in arguing that although the King James Bible is preferable to most modern translations because of its manuscript tradition, it is not divinely inspired. Among IFB institutions which rejects King James Onlyism is
Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary. The institution treats only the original manuscripts of the Bible as the
inerrant Word of God, a position that places it in opposition to the King James Only movement, which asserts that the original manuscripts no longer exist due to their being thousands of years old. King James Onlyists have criticized DBTS (together with
Bob Jones University and other institutions, including
Central Baptist Theological Seminary) for playing an influential role in convincing some IFB groups to adopt modern Bible translations.
Soteriology IFBs overwhelmingly believe in
salvation by grace through faith alone and
eternal security, but they may differ slightly from each other on other positions. Some align with
Free Grace theology, such as Hyles, Hutson,
Ernest Pickering, Smith, and Ruckman. Others, including Hymers, Jr., and Cloud, believe true repentance is abandoning sins and that salvation changes how a person lives, however, they reject requiring a lost sinner to make Jesus Christ "Lord" of their entire life. There are also some IFBs who espouse
Lordship salvation and a few may even embrace moderate
Calvinistic views. IFBs often emphasize the distinction between law and gospel, a concept famously illustrated in Roloff's sermon "Dr. Law and Dr. Grace." In this sermon, Roloff described the law as revealing humanity's sins and exposing their inability to attain righteousness through their own works. This understanding, he explained, serves to guide individuals toward grace, where they can find forgiveness and redemption. Most IFBs strongly believe that the literal shedding of blood on the cross was a central part of Christ's atoning work, rejecting the view that the Biblical references to blood are intended as metaphors for death and instead emphasize the literal and physical aspect. Many also teach that after his resurrection,
Jesus presented his blood on the heavenly mercy seat, often considering the literal blood of Christ as the object of faith for salvation in the New Testament. A few such as Hymers, Jr., have stated that when preaching the gospel, one needs to include both the death of Jesus and the blood of Jesus. This position is in direct contrast to the position mostly associated with
Robert Thieme, who rejected the bleeding of Christ as a part of the propitiation, and
John F. MacArthur has also stated similar views. Some IFBs adhere to the
Sinner's Prayer, which is a prayer of confession to God by an unbeliever who has the desire to be saved, and they see reciting such a prayer as the moment defining one's salvation. However, others such as Cloud have criticized the sinner's prayer as leading to inauthentic conversions and calling it "quick prayerism." The claim that prayer is necessary to be saved was also critiqued by Hyles in a sermon entitled "Fundamentalist Heresy." IFBs tend to reject atonement theories such as the
governmental theory and the
moral influence theory, but instead believe that
Jesus' substitutionary bloody death paid the penalty of sin. however, different IFBs vary in what to them constitutes separation in specific areas., Philippines.Additionally, there is a distinction between first and second degree separation. IFBs want to live in a way that is distinct from the typical lifestyle of the world (first degree). Some would claim that not only should one separate from the world, but also from those Christians who will not separate themselves from the world (second degree), and believe that Christians who are tied up with the things of "the world" are themselves guilty of apostasy for their failure to adequately separate. The more rigid second degree separation was opposed by Rice and Hutson, however it was affirmed by Hyles. Among IFBs, Chappell has also warned of being "hyper-separated," arguing that separation and collaboration needs to be taken with a balance. A few IFBs believe in the more rigid so-called "third degree separation," which is the belief that one needs to separate from fellow IFBs who do not practice secondary separation.
Ecclesiology Many IFBs adhere to some form of "
Baptist successionism" (or Baptist perpetuity), the belief that Baptists trace their origins through a lineage of Christians dating back to the Apostles with medieval groups cited as pre-Reformation representatives of Baptist principles.Some proponents of Baptist successionism take this further by embracing
Landmarkism or "Baptist bride theology," the view that only Baptist churches constitute the body or bride of Christ and that only Baptists will be
raptured and partake in the marriage supper of the Lamb. They also claim that the Baptist Church began with
John the Baptist or
Jesus himself. However, this perspective is not universally accepted within the IFB movement and has been criticized for denying the
universal body of Christ comprising all true believers. IFBs reject the ordination of women pastors and
deacons in a church according to the
Apostle Paul's writings in
1 Timothy 2,
Titus, and
1 Corinthians 14. Many IFBs believe that according to 1 Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:6-7 a pastor cannot be
divorced, however, some reject this interpretation. Ruckman argued that being "blameless" has nothing to do with divorce because he believed that a pastor can be remarried to one wife and that Paul is mainly addressing
polygamy in those passages. Baptist churches that adhere to fundamentalism often call themselves "Independent Baptist Church," "Bible Baptist Church," or "Fundamental Baptist Church" to demonstrate their membership in the movement.
Worship music Most IFB churches exclusively use traditional worship during their services, however, there are some that have a mixture of
traditional and
contemporary worship styles. Many IFBs such as Hyles, Chick, Chappell, Cloud, Pickering, and Smith have criticized and rejected the use of
contemporary Christian music (CCM). Such leaders argue that styles such as
rock and
pop music are overly emotional, entertainment-focused, and man-centered, making them unsuitable for use in services. According to them, biblical principles should guide Christians to use
hymns rather than CCM, which they feel lacks the reverence and theological depth appropriate for worship.
Views on alcohol IFBs hold that the Bible forbids partaking of
alcohol altogether and argue that some alleged alcoholic drinks in the Bible are only medicinal uses of alcohol. They also argue that wine in the Bible can also refer to non-alcoholic beverages such as unfermented grape juice, and for this reason the context must determine which meaning is required. In passages where beverages are viewed negatively, IFBs understand them to mean fermented wine, and where they are viewed positively, they understand them to mean unfermented wine. According to this view, they believe that the wine in the
Last Supper could not have been fermented, because they believe that the fermentation of wine is similar to the fermentation of bread through yeast, which they view as a symbol of sin. Thus, IFBs have argued that such wine cannot symbolize the blood of Christ.
Other issues Most IFBs adhere to a
pre-Tribulation view of the
Rapture, although a minority subscribe to
mid-Tribulation or
post-Tribulation interpretations. The movement encompasses a range of theological and ideological perspectives, with notable variation on issues such as
Calvinism, expressions of
patriotism, belief in certain
conspiracy theories, dispensational salvation, interpretations of biblical accounts involving
giants, and details on the relationships between the Persons of the
Trinity, such as the
classical Trinitarian doctrine of the
eternal generation of the Son, among other views. Regarding creation, IFBs typically align with either YEC or
gap creationism, a form of
old Earth creationism that accommodates an ancient universe while maintaining a literal reading of Genesis. While the majority reject
modern flat Earth beliefs, a very small subset affirms
geocentric creationism that retains a spherical Earth but places it at the center of the cosmos. In terms of
Christology, IFBs tend to uphold
orthodox theological positions and affirm the historic condemnations of heresies such as
monophysitism,
Nestorianism,
Apollinarianism, and
monothelitism. Nevertheless, a few within the movement have questioned whether monothelitism should be classified as heretical. == Relationships to other Christians ==