Beginnings Edgar de Wahl announced the creation of Occidental in 1922 with the first issue of the magazine , published in
Tallinn,
Estonia under the name . Occidental was a product of years of personal experimentation under the name Auli (
auxiliary language), which he used from 1906 to 1921 and which later on gained the nickname proto-Occidental. De Wahl, originally a proponent of
Volapük and then
Esperanto, began creating Occidental after the failed
vote to reform Esperanto in 1894. De Wahl corresponded with other language creators, among them the Italian mathematician
Giuseppe Peano (creator of
Latino sine flexione), from whom he gained an appreciation for its selection of international vocabulary, and
Waldemar Rosenberger, the creator of
Idiom Neutral. Upon its announcement in 1922, Occidental was nearly complete. De Wahl had not intended to announce the language for a few years, but decided to accelerate its release after hearing that the
League of Nations (LON) had begun an inquiry into the question of an international language. The first known publication in Occidental, a booklet entitled
Transcendent Algebra by
Jacob Linzbach, appeared shortly before debuted. Occidental began gathering followers due to its readability, despite a complete lack of grammars and dictionaries. Two years later in 1924, de Wahl wrote that he was corresponding with about 30 people "in good Occidental" despite the lack of learning material, and users of other languages began to join Occidental. The first dictionary, the , a collection of Occidental root words and their equivalents in eight languages, was published the following year. was also a forum for various other planned languages, while still mainly written in Occidental. The name was changed to in 1927 as it began to officially promote Occidental in lieu of other languages, and that January the magazine's editorial and administrative office was moved to the Vienna neighborhood of
Mauer, now part of
Liesing. Much of the early success for Occidental in this period came from the office's new central location, along with the efforts of
Engelbert Pigal, also from Austria, whose article (The Work of Edgar de Wahl) led to interest in Occidental from users of
Ido.
Vienna period and World War II The Vienna period was also marked by financial stability. With the help of two major backers,
Hanns Hörbiger, also from Vienna, and G.A. Moore from London, thrived despite the economic crisis. After the two died in 1931, was again forced to rely on revenue from subscriptions and republications. The growing movement began campaigning more assertively for Occidental in the early 1930s, leveraging its at-sight readability by contacting organizations such as companies, embassies, printing houses and the LON with letters entirely in Occidental that were often understood and answered. Recordings of spoken Occidental on
gramophone records for distribution were first made in this period. The years from 1935 to 1939 were particularly active for and a second edition of the journal was published. Originally entitled , it was soon renamed , focusing on items of more internal interest such as linguistic issues, reports of Occidental in the news, and financial updates. In early 1936, not counting the 110 issues of and other journals and bulletins, a total of 80 publications existed in and about Occidental. But the years before
World War II posed difficulties for Occidental
and other planned languages. They were banned in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia, forced to disband, and kept under surveillance by the
Gestapo, which also destroyed instructional materials. The prohibition of auxiliary languages in Germany was particularly damaging as this was where most Occidentalists lived at the time. The inability to accept payment for subscriptions was a financial blow that continued after the war along with Germany's division into zones of influence, not all of which allowed payments. De Wahl, in Tallinn, was unable to communicate with the Occidental Union in Switzerland from 1939 to October 1947, first due to the war and thereafter the interception of mail between Switzerland and the Soviet Union. Unaware of this, de Wahl was bewildered at the lack of response to his continued letters; even a large collection of poetry translated into Occidental was never delivered. The only letter of his received in Switzerland came in 1947, asking the Occidental Union why it had not answered any of his. Meanwhile, de Wahl's house and his entire library had been destroyed during the bombardment of Tallinn. De Wahl himself was incarcerated for a time after refusing to
leave Estonia for Germany, and later took refuge in a psychiatric hospital where he lived out his life. The outbreak of war in 1939 put a halt to publications of both s through 1940, but in 1941 began publication once again and continued until 1950. During the war, only those in neutral Switzerland and Sweden were able to fully devote themselves to the language, carrying on activities semi-officially. During the war, Occidentalists noticed that the language was often permitted to be sent by telegram within and outside of Switzerland (especially to and from Sweden) even without official recognition, surmising that censors were able to understand it and may have thought them to be written in Spanish or
Romansch (a small yet official Romance language in Switzerland). This allowed some communication to take place between the Occidentalists in Switzerland and Sweden. The other centres of Occidental activity in Europe did not fare as well, with the stocks of study materials in Vienna and Tallinn having been destroyed in bombings and numerous Occidentalists sent to
concentration camps in Germany and Czechoslovakia. Contacts were reestablished shortly after the war by those who remained, with letters from countries such as France, Czechoslovakia, Finland and Great Britain reaching . Writers said they were ready to begin activities anew for the language. had subscribers in 58 cities in Switzerland a few months before the end of World War II in Europe, and A began publication again in 1946. with a flexibility that would "allow time and practice to take care of modifications that would prove to be necessary". As a result, some words had more than one permissible form, which could not be resolved by decree alone, thus leaving the ultimate decision to the community by including both possible forms in the first Occidental dictionaries. One example concerned the verb (to write) and a possible other form , as both created internationally recognizable derivations: and from , or and from .
Orthography was another area in which several possibilities existed, namely etymologic orthography (, ), historic orthography (, ), or simplified orthography (, ). The simplified orthography eventually became the standard by 1939. With questions still remaining about the official form of some words and a lack of general material destined for the general public, much time during World War II was spent on language standardization and course creation, and due to the continuing war, in August 1943 the decision was made to create an interim academy to officialize this process. This process had just about begun not long before the war, and the Swiss Occidentalists, finding themselves isolated from the rest of the continent, opted to concentrate on instructional materials to have ready by the end of the war.
IALA, Interlingua, and name change to Interlingue The International Auxiliary Language Association (IALA), founded in 1924 to study and determine the best planned language for international communication, was at first viewed with suspicion by the Occidental community. Its co-founder
Alice Vanderbilt Morris was an Esperantist, as were many of its staff, and many Occidentalists including de Wahl himself In 1945, the IALA announced that it planned to create its own language and showed four possible versions under consideration, all of which were naturalistic as opposed to schematic. Occidentalists were by and large pleased that the IALA had decided to create a language so similar in nature to Occidental, seeing it as a credible association that gave weight to their argument that an auxiliary language should proceed from study of natural languages instead of attempting to fit them into an artificial system. Ric Berger was particularly positive in describing the upcoming language as a victory for the natural school Berger still had reservations, however, doubting whether a project with such a similar aspect and structure would be able to "suddenly cause prejudices [against planned languages] to fall and create unity among the partisans of international languages". Berger also feared that it might simply "disperse the partisans of the natural language with nothing to show for it" after Occidental had created "unity in the naturalistic school" for so long. without orthographic differences taken into account (e.g. with and considered the same word), structurally and derivationally they were very different. De Wahl's Rule in Occidental had mostly done away with Latin double stem verbs (verbs such as act: , or send: , ), while Interlingua simply accepted them as part and parcel of a naturalistic system. The control languages (Italian, Spanish and/or Portuguese, French, English) used by Interlingua to form its vocabulary for the most part require an eligible word to be found in three source languages (the "rule of three"), which would conflict with Occidental's Germanic
substrate and various other words which would be by definition ineligible in a unified language that retained Interlingua's methodology. Interlingua also allowed optional irregular verbal conjugations such as , and as the first-person singular, third-person plural and subjunctive form of , the verb 'to be'. Occidental was also still recovering from the war. continued to report into 1946 on who had survived the war, who among them were ready to participate again and those who were still out of touch. The magazine was financially strained by inflated postwar printing costs and its inability to collect payments from certain countries, a marked contrast to the well-funded New York-based IALA. International politics was another difficulty for Occidentalists after the war. The beginning of the
Cold War created an uncomfortable situation for the Occidental-Union, whose name unfortunately coincided with that of an anti-Russian political league; the Swiss Occidentalists believed that was why all of de Wahl's letters from Tallinn were intercepted. De Wahl remained unaware of developments in the language and the proposal for the rest of his life. In early 1948 the Czechoslovak Occidentalists had begun requesting a new name that would allow them to continue their linguistic activities without suspicion, proposing the name Interal (International auxiliari lingue), to which the union responded that the term would be more appropriate and that they were free to introduce the language as "Interlingue (Occidental)", or even remove the mention of Occidental in parentheses if they wanted. Ric Berger began advocating for a change of name from Occidental to Interlingue in 1948 which he also hoped would aid in a fusion between the two languages. The official vote on the name change to Interlingue took place in 1949 and was passed with 91 per cent support, making the official name Interlingue, with Interlingue (Occidental) also permitted, starting September 1949. The 1951 debut of Interlingua weakened Interlingue-Occidental, which until then had been unchallenged in the field of naturalistic planned auxiliary languages. Vĕra Barandovská-Frank's perception of the situation at the time was as follows (translated from Esperanto): Don Harlow similarly summarizes the year 1951 for Occidental:
Stagnation and revival While the migration of so many users to Interlingua had severely weakened Interlingue, the ensuing drop in activity was gradual and took place over decades. ceased publication after 1950, and the frequency of began to gradually drop: once every second month from 1952, and then once per quarter from 1963. for an average of less than one issue per year. According to Harlow, "in 1985 Occidental's last periodical, , ceased publication, and its editor, Mr. Adrian Pilgrim, is quoted as having described Occidental as a 'dead language.'" As was the case for other planned languages, the arrival of the Internet spurred Interlingue's revival. In the year 1999 the first
Yahoo! Group in Occidental was founded, had begun publishing intermittently again, and the language became a subject of discussion in literature on auxiliary languages. One example is
The Esperanto Book released in 1995 by Harlow, who wrote that Occidental had an intentional emphasis on European forms and that some of its leading followers espoused a
Eurocentric philosophy, which may have hindered its spread. Still, the opposite view An Interlingue
Wikipedia was approved in 2004. In recent years official meetings of Interlingue speakers have resumed: one in
Ulm in 2013, another in
Munich in 2014 with three participants, and a third in Ulm the next year with five. The most recent edition of
Cosmoglotta is volume 333, for the period from January to June 2024. Recent years have shown new books published in Interlingue such as
The Little Prince, the
Gospel of Mark, and works including , , and . == Language philosophy ==