Box office Alien: Romulus grossed $105.3 million in the United States and Canada, and $245.5 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $350.9 million. In the United States and Canada,
Alien: Romulus was projected to gross $28–40 million in its opening weekend, with some estimates going as high as $45–55 million. The film made $18 million on its first day, including $6.5 million from Thursday night previews. It went on to debut to $42 million, topping the box office. The three-day opening included an estimated 2.7 million admissions and was the second-highest for the franchise and a record for director Fede Álvarez (beating the $26.4 million earned by 2016's ''
Don't Breathe'') and actress Cailee Spaeny (surpassing the $28.1 million earned by 2018's
Pacific Rim Uprising). When asked about the biggest factors in watching the film, audiences polled by PostTrak listed the in-theater trailer (21%), online trailer (13%), and
word of mouth (13%). In its second weekend, the film made $16.4 million, a drop of 61%, finishing behind holdover
Deadpool & Wolverine. In just two weekends, the film became the second highest-grossing horror film in IMAX with $31.2 million, only behind
Prometheus ($31.8 million). Outside the United States and Canada, the film made $68.1 million from international markets in its opening weekend for a global $110.1 million debut, which
The New York Times listed as a success. Its international gross included $25.7 million from China, which
Deadline Hollywood called an "over-performance". It was the second highest-grossing Hollywood film in China of the year with $110 million, behind
Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire. Critical response Alien: Romulus received positive reviews from critics. The
review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes reported that critics praised the film's "striking visuals and claustrophobic terror with gory action and a formidable lead performance from Cailee Spaeny", calling it "arguably the best installment since
Aliens". On the website, 80% of 392 critics gave the film a positive review, with an average rating of 6.9/10. Its critics consensus reads: "Honoring its nightmarish predecessors while chestbursting at the seams with new frights of its own,
Romulus injects some fresh acid blood into one of cinema's great horror franchises." According to
Metacritic, the film received "generally favorable" reviews based on a
weighted average score of 64 out of 100 from 57 critics. Audiences polled by
CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale, while those surveyed by
PostTrak gave it an 82% positive score, with 65% saying they would definitely recommend it.
Owen Gleiberman of
Variety called
Alien: Romulus "one of the best
Alien sequels... It delivers the slimy creep-out goods in a way that none of the last three
Alien films have." He further wrote that "Spaeny, with her clear eyes and serene resolve, makes her presence felt as Rain, the closest equivalent here to the fearless Ripley." James Mottram, in a five star review for
NME, described the film as "thrilling and scary" and coming "close to the brilliance of Ridley Scott and James Cameron". He praised the production design, digital work, practical and visual effects and the score. Mottram described the performance of Jonsson as Andy as a "stand-out" a view shared by Clarisse Loughrey writing for
The Independent.
Mick LaSalle of the
San Francisco Chronicle criticized the film, writing: "The first 45 minutes are boring beyond description. [...] The script has the aliens waking up and falling asleep at the convenience of the screenwriters, not in a way that makes consistent sense. [...] The foundational mistake came when someone said, 'Hey, let's make another
Alien movie.' News flash: The alien concept is dead. Leave it alone, and leave poor Ian Holm out of it." David Ehrlich of
Indiewire wrote: "The director would rather torture his cast than develop their characters. There's nothing inherently wrong with that trade-off, but Álvarez doesn't satisfy the first half of the equation well enough to justify his disregard for the second. High on jolts [...] and low on more probing scares,
Romulus isn't nearly inventive enough to forefront its slaughter at the expense of its soul."
Bilge Ebiri, writing for
Vulture, expressed disappointment in the film's lessened ambition in comparison with other installments, stating that it is "a film engineered mostly to provide some basic genre thrills and keep the IP alive so that the now-Disney-owned Fox can generate more
Alien movies....
Alien: Romulus is diverting enough, but it's also instantly forgettable—something I don't think I've ever said about any other
Alien film, good or bad."
Response to Rook's likeness of Ian Holm for the character of Rook was widely criticized. The decision to digitally add the late Ian Holm for the character of Rook was widely criticized. Wendy Ide of
The Guardian called it "a queasily misguided choice" that was "ghoulish, exploitative, disrespectful and unnecessary". In
Slate, Sam Adams asked, "Why let the dead rest when there's IP [intellectual property] to be mined?" He went on to compare the film's studio to the franchise's villainous Weyland-Yutani corporation, in that it's "a massive conglomerate that puts profit ahead of respect for human lives". Loughrey called it "ethically problematic" and "cinematic necromancy" Similarly,
SlashFilm reviewer Chris Evangelista wrote, "It's distracting and weird. It never, ever looks real [...] The simple truth here is that not only does this look bad, it's a bad idea all around".
The Daily Telegraph critic Tim Robey commented, "One thing I never thought I'd complain about in 2024 was a film having too much Ian Holm in it". Álvarez told the
Los Angeles Times that he had obtained permission from Holm's family, and stated it had been done to honor Holm's role in the franchise. Reviewer James Mottram praised the digital inclusion, saying that it "works well, both technically and narratively."
Accolades == Comic book ==