Justification The epistle contains the following famous passage concerning
salvation and justification: This passage has been contrasted with the teachings of Paul the Apostle on justification. Some scholars even believe that the passage is a response to Paul. One issue in the debate is the meaning of the Greek word (
dikaiόō), 'render righteous or such as he ought to be'), with some among the participants taking the view that James is responding to a misunderstanding of Paul.
Roman Catholicism and
Eastern Orthodoxy have historically argued that the passage disproves simplistic versions of the doctrine of justification by faith alone (). The early Protestants resolved the apparent conflict between James and Paul regarding faith and works in alternate ways from the Catholics and Orthodox. One modern American Protestant explanation pre-supposes that James taught : According to
Ben Witherington III, differences exist between the
Apostle Paul and James, but both used the
law of Moses, the
teachings of Jesus and other Jewish and non-Jewish sources, and "Paul was not anti-law any more than James was a
legalist". A more recent article suggests that the current confusion regarding the Epistle of James about faith and works resulted from
Augustine of Hippo's anti-
Donatist polemic in the early fifth century. This approach reconciles the views of Paul and James on faith and works.
Anointing of the sick The epistle is also the chief biblical text for the
anointing of the sick. James wrote:
G. A. Wells suggested that the passage was evidence of late authorship of the epistle, on the grounds that the healing of the sick being done through an official body of
presbyters (
elders) indicated a considerable development of ecclesiastical organisation "whereas in Paul's day to heal and work miracles pertained to believers indiscriminately (I Corinthians, XII:9)."
Works, deeds and care for the poor James and the
M Source material in Matthew, alone within the New Testament canon, maintain a stand against the rejection of works and deeds. According to
E. P. Sanders, traditional Christian theology wrongly divested the term "works" of its ethical grounding, part of the effort to characterize Judaism as legalistic. However, for James and for all Jews, faith is alive only through Torah observance. In other words, belief demonstrates itself through practice and manifestation. For James, claims about belief are empty, unless they are alive in action, works and deeds. The epistle emphasizes the importance of acts of charity or works to go along with having the Christian faith by means the following three verses in chapter 2:
Torah observance James is unique in the canon by its seemingly explicit support of Torah observance (
the Law). According to Bibliowicz, not only is this text a unique view into the milieu of the Jewish founders – its inclusion in the canon signals that as canonization began (fourth century onward) Torah observance among believers in Jesus was still authoritative. According to modern scholarship James, Q, Matthew, the Didache, and the pseudo-Clementine literature reflect a similar ethos, ethical perspective, and stand on, or assume, Torah observance, according to the same source. James call to Torah observance (James 1:22-27) ensures salvation (James 2:12–13, 14–26). However, this is not generally the interpretation of this text, (neither the generally understood progression of thought,) and is doubtfully what James originally had in mind given, for example, the theology in the Epistle of Paul to the Romans and throughout the New Testament. Hartin is supportive of the focus on Torah observance and concludes that these texts support faith through action and sees them as reflecting the milieu of the Jewish followers of Jesus. Hub van de Sandt sees Matthew's and James' Torah observance reflected in a similar use of the Jewish Two Ways theme which is detectable in the Didache too (Didache 3:1–6).
Scot McKnight thinks that Torah observance is at the heart of James's ethics. A strong message against those advocating the rejection of Torah observance characterizes, and emanates from, this tradition: "Some have attempted while I am still alive, to transform my words by certain various interpretations, in order to teach the dissolution of the law; as though I myself were of such a mind, but did not freely proclaim it, which God forbid! For such a thing were to act in opposition to the law of God which was spoken by Moses, and was borne witness to by our Lord in respect of its eternal continuance; for thus he spoke: 'The heavens and the earth shall pass away, but one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass away from the law. James seem to propose a more radical and demanding interpretation of the law than mainstream Judaism. According to
John Painter, there is nothing in James to suggest any relaxation of the demands of the law. "No doubt James takes for granted his readers' observance of the whole law, while focusing his attention on its moral demands." In this context, there is a broader discussion on both sides. == Canonicity ==