According to historian Sérgio Campos Matos, in Oliveira Martins'
historiographical works "the single event is always related with the totality, with a principle of unity". Martins vacillated between
social determinism and individual affirmation, considering that collective reason and individual reason could not be separated. For him, the historical course of the Portuguese
nation was a "succession of voluntary acts, of plans of statesmen"; however, the action of these men was subordinated to an ideal system of determinant
principles and
laws, sharing the idea that human action was an instrument of
destiny. Oliveira Martins was both skeptic towards a "science of
universal history" (denying the existence of laws in history and preferring the teaching of
chronology and of the
philosophy of history) and the
historical romance (which he considered a "hybrid and false genre"), therefore, he preferred
narrative history. Martins's thesis proved to be controversial in the context of the second half of the nineteenth century, a time when fields like
archeology,
ethnology,
philology and geography shared great development and when there was tendency to view
History as a discipline based on
natural laws. Oliveira Martins was greatly influenced by authors like the German historian
Theodor Mommsen, namely the importance given to the
hero as the man who better incarnates the
nation's soul, the collective psychology of the
nation in a given historical moment, corresponding to its demands and ambitions. In Martins' last works the individual's function in history grows, as a sign of his skepticism towards an immediate national regeneration. ==References==