Stratton is perhaps better remembered for his work to improve the living conditions and broader wellbeing of a group of seasonal visitors to the countryside,
hop-pickers. Hops were a valuable cash crop, and Kent, with its proximity and transport links to London's
breweries, produced more than any other county in England. Hop-picking was a very labour-intensive process. Every September, tens of thousands of men, women and children, primarily from
East and South East London, and from the
Medway towns, would descend on the county for three weeks to bring in the harvest. Most came year after year, viewing it as a kind of holiday, exchanging overcrowded streets and slums for the green fields and fresh air of the countryside. By the 1870s, so many people headed for the annual hop harvest that railway companies ran ‘Hop-Picker Specials’ to transport the workforce to Kent. But with few exceptions, the conditions they faced on arrival were shocking. The overcrowded accommodation available might be a barn, stable, pigsty, cattle shed, or even a roof space.
Sanitation was appalling, and often non-existent, sometimes with fatal consequences. In September 1849, an outbreak of
cholera killed 43 "poor, half-starved, half-clothed" hop-pickers at
East Farleigh, Kent. By 1865, John Stratton decided it was time for action and he began to canvass support. The result was the formation of the Society for the Employment and Improved Lodging of Hop Pickers. Despite the support of numerous prominent people, including
peers, members of parliament and even the
Archbishop of Canterbury, the Society initially struggled to persuade hop-growers to spend significant sums of money on improving facilities. A different approach was required. Hop-pickers were merely tolerated as a necessary evil. They were essential for the harvest, but as soon as they returned home, the permanent populations in hop-growing districts breathed a huge, collective sigh of relief. Hop-pickers brought with them petty crime, vandalism, violence and foul language, and their behaviour, in general, could outrage delicate
Victorian sensitivities. Growers were fed up of being held responsible for the behaviour of ‘their’ hop-pickers, and it occurred to Stratton that their poor reputation might, strangely, prove their salvation. The Society became an agency, supplying hop-pickers to growers. In return for agreeing to moderate their behaviour, hop-pickers would benefit from better living conditions. If a hop-picker crossed the line, they would receive a black mark from the Society, with every chance they would struggle to be placed in future. In that way, growers had at least some assurance of improved, if not perfect, behaviour. Equally, the Society could refuse to supply labour to a non-compliant grower. The scheme's beauty was that both sides stood to benefit from the arrangement and it soon took off. Growers even tolerated the agency fee of
thruppence per picker, which funded the scheme's administration. ==Hopper huts==