German so-called
Maximilian armour of the early 16th century is a style using heavy fluting and some decorative etching, as opposed to the plainer finish on 15th-century
white armour. The shapes include influence from Italian styles. This era also saw the use of closed helms, as opposed to the 15th-century-style
sallets and
barbutes. During the early 16th century, the helmet and neckguard design was reformed to produce the so-called
Nürnberg armour, many of them masterpieces of workmanship and design. As firearms became better and more common on the battlefield, the utility of full armour gradually declined, and full suits became restricted to those made for
jousting which continued to develop. The decoration of fine armour greatly increased in the period, using a range of techniques, and further greatly increasing the cost. Elaborately decorated plate armour for royalty and the very wealthy was being produced. Highly decorated armour is often called
parade armour, a somewhat misleading term as such armour might well be worn on active military service. Steel plate armour for
Henry II of France, made in 1555, is covered with meticulous embossing, which has been subjected to blueing, silvering and gilding. Such work required armourers to either collaborate with artists or have artistic skill of their own; another alternative was to take designs from
ornament prints and other prints, as was often done.
Daniel Hopfer was an etcher of armour by training, who developed
etching as a form of
printmaking. Other artists such as
Hans Holbein the Younger produced designs for armour. The
Milanese armourer
Filippo Negroli, from a leading dynasty of armourers, was the most famous modeller of figurative
relief decoration on armour. File:KHM Wien A 3 - Armor of Roberto da Sanseverino (d. 1487).jpg|Suit of armour of the Italian
condottiero Roberto Sanseverino d'Aragona File:Emperor charles v.png|Painting of
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor by
Juan Pantoja de la Cruz (c. 1605), after an original by
Titian, depicting an elaborate Renaissance-era suit of armour. File:Erik XIVs rustning från 1562 - Livrustkammaren - 73817.tif|Parade armour from 1562, belonged to
Erik XIV of Sweden. Made by Eliseus Libaerts and
Etienne Delaune.
Infantry Reduced plate armour, typically consisting of a
breastplate, a
burgonet,
morion or
cabasset and
gauntlets, however, also became popular among 16th-century
mercenaries, and there are many references to so-called
munition armour being ordered for infantrymen at a fraction of the cost of full plate armour. This mass-produced armour was often heavier and made of lower quality metal than fine armour for commanders.
Jousting (c. 1500) Specialised
jousting armour produced in the late 15th to 16th century was heavier, and could weigh as much as , as it was not intended for free combat, it did not need to permit free movement, the only limiting factor being the maximum weight that could be carried by a
warhorse of the period. The medieval
joust has its origins in the military tactics of
heavy cavalry during the
High Middle Ages. Since the 15th century, jousting had become a
sport (
hastilude) with less direct relevance to warfare, for example using separate specialized armour and equipment. During the 1490s, emperor
Maximilian I invested a great deal of effort in perfecting the sport, for which he received his nickname of "The Last Knight".
Rennen and
Stechen were two sportive forms of the joust developed during the 15th century and practiced throughout the 16th century. The armours used for these two respective styles of the joust were known as
Rennzeug and
Stechzeug, respectively. The
Stechzeug in particular developed into extremely heavy armour which completely inhibited the movement of the rider, in its latest forms resembling an armour-shaped cabin integrated into the
horse armour more than a functional suit of armour. Such forms of sportive equipment during the final phase of the joust in
16th-century Germany gave rise to modern misconceptions about the heaviness or clumsiness of "medieval armour", as notably popularised by
Mark Twain's ''
A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court''. The extremely heavy helmets of the
Stechzeug are explained by the fact that the aim was to detach the
crest of the opponent's helmet, resulting in frequent full impact of the lance to the helmet. By contrast, the
Rennen was a type of joust with lighter contact. Here, the aim was to hit the opponent's shield. The specialised
Rennzeug was developed on the request of Maximilian, who desired a return to a more agile form of joust compared to the heavily armoured "full contact"
Stechen. In the
Rennzeug, the shield was attached to the armour with a mechanism of springs and would detach itself upon contact. File:Stechzeug of Maximilian I by Wendelin Boeheim.jpg|
Stechzeug; note that the parts protecting the lower body and the legs were incorporated as part of the
horse armour (not shown). File:Rennzeug by Wendelin Boeheim.jpg|
Rennzeug File:HJRK B 75, A 79 - Kolbenturnierhelm, 1480-85, and arms, 1486.jpg| Armour designed for the
Kolbenturnier, dated to the 1480s. The
Kolbenturnier was a late form of the
tournament, unlike the joust played with two
teams using wooden clubs (
Kolben) to hit opponents' helmet crests. == Early modern period ==