Junkers Ju 88

Background The origins of the Ju 88 can be traced back to the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM) and the formulation of a new requirement in 1934 that called for a new multipurpose aircraft. This requirement was issued to a total of four aircraft manufacturers, these being Focke Wulf, Henschel, Junkers, and Messerschmitt; all firms except Focke Wulf opted to produce a response. and Ju 88. Both were twin-engined bomber aircraft, the main difference between the two being the Ju 85's use of a twin fin (and twin rudder) tail unit while the Ju 88 had a single fin (and rudder) tail unit instead. Following deliberation amongst officials, the RLM decided in favour of the Ju 88. He was assisted by Wilhelm Heinrich Evers and American engineer Alfred Gassner. During its first flight, it managed to reach a speed of about . On 10 April 1937, the first prototype was lost in an accident. Upon reviewing the Ju 88's performance, Hermann Göring, head of the Luftwaffe, was reportedly ecstatic; it was allegedly viewed as an aircraft that could finally fulfil the promise of the Schnellbomber. The streamlined fuselage was modelled after its contemporary, the Dornier Do 17, but furnished with fewer defensive guns as a result of the belief still held that it could outrun late 1930s-era fighters. During March 1939, the fifth prototype set a closed-circuit record while carrying a payload at a speed of . The first five prototypes had conventionally-operating dual-strut leg rearwards-retracting main gear, however, starting with the V6 prototype, a main gear design debuted that twisted the new, single-leg main gear strut through 90° during the retraction sequence, much like that of the American Curtiss P-40 Warhawk fighter. The choice of annular radiators for engine cooling on the Ju 88, which placed these radiators immediately forward of each engine and directly behind each propeller, allowed the cooling lines for the engine coolant and oil-cooling radiators (integrated within the annular design) to be as short as possible, with integral port and starboard air intakes for cooling the exhaust headers, the starboard inlet also supplying the inlet air for the supercharger. During autumn of 1938, Dr. Heinrich Koppenberg (managing director of Jumo) assured Göring that a production rate of 300 Ju 88s per month was definitely achievable; indeed, such a rate was achieved during 1940. However, the pre-war ramping up of production was delayed drastically by developmental problems. Although planned for a service introduction in 1938, the Ju 88 finally entered squadron service (with only 12 aircraft) on the first day of the invasion of Poland in 1939. Production was painfully slow at this point, only a single Ju 88 was being manufactured per week as problems kept cropping up. The Ju 88C series of heavy fighter was also designed in early 1940, but its existence was kept secret from Göring, as he only sought bombers at this time. Dive bomber , Greece, 1943 In October 1937, Ernst Udet had ordered the development of the Ju 88 as a heavy dive bomber. This decision was influenced by the success of the Ju 87 Stuka in this role. The Junkers development centre at Dessau gave priority to the study of pull-out systems and dive brakes. The first prototype to be tested as a dive bomber was the Ju 88 V4 followed by the V5 and V6. These models became the planned prototype for the A-1 series. The V5 made its maiden flight on 13 April 1938, and the V6 on 28 June 1938. Both the V5 and V6 were fitted with four-blade propellers, an extra bomb bay and a central "control system". Junkers later used the A-4 airframe for the A-17 torpedo carrier, which did not have the undernose Bola gondola for a ventral gun position. The C-6 was used mostly as fighter-bomber and therefore assigned to bomber units. As a reaction to the increasing number of attacks on German shipping, especially on U-boats in the Bay of Biscay, from July 1942 it started flying anti-shipping patrols and escort missions from bases in France. V./Kampfgeschwader 40 was specifically formed to operate the C-6. The aircraft of V./KG 40 (which was redesignated I./Zerstörergeschwader 1 in 1943) were a significant threat to antisubmarine aircraft and operated as escort fighters for the more vulnerable Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor maritime patrol bombers. Between July 1942 and July 1944, the Ju 88s of KG 40 and ZG 1 were credited with 109 confirmed air-to-air victories, at a cost of 117 losses. They were finally deployed against the Allied Invasion of Normandy in June 1944, incurring heavy losses for little effect before being disbanded on 5 August 1944. Some Ju 88 variants were also used as radio controlled bombs in the Mistel composite aircraft configuration, by coupling a bomber filled with explosive with a fighter such as the Focke-Wulf Fw 56 or the Messerschmitt Bf 109E. Attack bomber The Ju 88P was a specialized variant for ground attack and to function as a bomber destroyer, designed starting from 1942 and produced in small numbers, using examples of the Bordkanone heavy calibre aviation autocannon series, which required the omission of the Bola undernose gondola for clearance. The prototype, derived from a standard Ju 88 A-4, was armed with a anti-tank gun derived from the 7.5 cm PaK 40 installed in a large conformal gun pod under the fuselage. This was followed by a small batch of Ju 88 P-1, which standardized the solid sheet metal nose of the C version for all known examples of the P-series, and used the new PaK 40L semi-automatic gun, also known as the Bordkanone BK 7,5, which was also meant for use in both the later Henschel Hs 129B-3 dedicated anti-armor aircraft, and a never-achieved production version of the He 177A-3/R5 ground-attack Flak-suppression Stalingradtyp field-improvised version. The Ju 88P-1 was produced in some 40 units, but with the massive cannon installation resulting in a slow and vulnerable aircraft, The first version of the Ju 88C was the C-1 with 20 aircraft converted from A-1 airframes. Many Ju 88C's had their Bola gondolas modified to hold up to two forward firing cannons. Several C-6 night fighters were equipped with two "Schräge-Musik" upward-firing cannons in trial fittings, and from mid 1943 onward, there was an official field modification kit available for this arrangement. A small number of the C-series day fighters had their new solid-metal noses specially painted to resemble the bomber A-series' "beetle's eye" faceted clear view nose glazing, in an attempt to deceive Allied pilots into thinking the fighters were actually bombers; the unusual "camouflage" attempt did result initially in a number of Allied aerial losses. Ju 88R The Ju 88R series night fighters were basically versions of the Ju 88 C-6, powered by unitized BMW 801 radial engines. The R-1 had BMW 801L engines and the R-2 had BMW 801 G-2 engines. One of the first aircraft from the R-1 series that went into service (Werknummer 360 043) was involved in one of the most significant defections from the Luftwaffe. On 9 May 1943, this night fighter (D5+EV), which was stationed with 10./NJG 3 in Aalborg Denmark, flew to the RAF Station at Dyce (now Aberdeen Airport) with its entire crew and complete electronic equipment on board. The fact that Spitfire Vb fighters No.165 (Ceylon) Squadron escorted it towards the end of its flight could indicate that its arrival had been expected. It was immediately transferred to Farnborough Airfield, received RAF markings and serial number PJ876, and was tested in great detail. The preserved aircraft is on exhibit at the Royal Air Force Museum Midlands, as one of the first two intact Ju 88s in aviation museums. The Luftwaffe learned of this defection only the following month when members of the crew, pilot Oberleutnant Heinrich Schmitt (son of the former secretary to the ministry for foreign affairs (1923–1929) Gustav Stresemann) and Oberfeldwebel Paul Rosenberger made broadcasts on British radio. The third crew-member, Erich Kantwill, refused to co-operate with the British and was treated as a regular prisoner of war. Ju 88G All previous night fighter versions of the Ju 88 used a modified A-series fuselage. The G-series fuselage was purpose-built for the special needs of a night fighter, with the A-series' Bola ventral under-nose defensive gun position omitted for lower aerodynamic drag and less weight, and adding the enlarged squared-off vertical fin/rudder tail unit of the Ju 188. G-1 aircraft possessed more powerful armament and like the earlier R-1, used a pair of BMW 801 radial engines, the G-1 using the later BMW 801G-2 version. Electronic equipment consisted of the then-standard FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 90 MHz VHF radar using eight-dipole Hirschgeweih antennas, which could include fitment of the borderline-SHF-band FuG 350 Naxos radar detector with its receiving antenna housed in a teardrop-shaped streamlined fairing above the canopy, or FuG 227 Flensburg radar detector homing devices that had their own trio of twin-dipole antennae: one on each wing leading edge and one under the tail. One Ju 88G-1 of 7. Staffel/NJG 2 was flown by mistake to RAF Woodbridge in July 1944, giving the Royal Air Force its first chance to check out the VHF-band Lichtenstein SN-2 radar and Flensburg radar detector gear. equipped with the FuG 240 Berlin cavity magnetron radar, with smooth radome nose G-6 versions were equipped with Jumo 213A inverted V-12 engines (using the same redesigned annular radiator cores as the Ju 188s powered by them), enlarged fuel tanks and often one or two MG 151/20 cannons in a Schräge Musik ("Jazz Music", i.e. slanted) installation. These guns were pointed obliquely upwards and forwards from the upper fuselage – usually at an angle of 70°. Only about 15 of the Berlin systems were completed before V-E Day. Many Luftwaffe night fighter aces, such as Helmut Lent (110 victories) and Heinrich Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein (87 victories) flew Ju 88s during their careers. ==Operational history==

Initial operations and the invasion of Poland The first Ju 88s to be used in squadron service were assigned to the unit Erprobungskommando 88 (Ekdo 88), which was responsible for testing new bomber designs and their crews under hostile conditions. On 26 September 1939, the unit's first operation was conducted, during which multiple Ju 88s flew over the Firth of Forth with the intention of bombing any British warships present. It is generally believed that no meaningful damage was inflicted to any British vessel during this raid, although future attacks to this area by the type were often more successful. A total of 12 Ju 88s saw action during the invasion of Poland. Ekdo 88 selected 12 aircraft and their crews and attached them to 1./Kampfgeschwader 25. As a result of its small operational numbers, the type made no meaningful impact. Battle of Norway The Luftwaffe committed II./Kampfgeschwader 30 to the campaign under X. Fliegerkorps for Operation Weserübung. By this time, major performance deficiencies in the A-1 led to an all-out effort in a major design rework. The outcome was a longer, wingspan, from extended rounded wing tips that had already been standardised on the A-4 version, that was deemed needed for all A-1s; thus the A-5 was born. From October 1940, as a result of the high loss rate, daytime bombing of Britain ceased in favour of night time bombing. The Battle of Britain proved to be very costly to the Luftwaffe. The Ju 88's higher speed did not prevent losses from exceeding those of its Dornier Do 17 and Heinkel He 111 stablemates despite being deployed in smaller numbers than either. During 1940, Ju 88 losses over Britain totalled 303 aircraft between July and October 1940. Amongst the factors responsible for the high loss rate were the poor coordination between Luftwaffe fighter and bomber aircraft and the austere conditions of the French airfields from where these bombers operated. Of all the losses suffered by the Ju 88 at that time, however, a number were due to the tricky behaviour of the aircraft, especially when compared with the proven He 111, and to the crews' lack of experience on the type – many having converted to the Ju 88 only shortly before. Of the 39 losses recorded for July 1940, for example, only 20 were due to enemy action. The others being written off in training accidents, crashes, or malfunctions over mainland Europe. A series of field modifications were made to make the Ju 88 less vulnerable, including the replacement of the single MG 15 rear machine gun by a twin-barreled MG 81Z machine gun and the fitting of additional cockpit armour. One incident involved ground fighting between the crew of an A-1 and soldiers from the London Irish Rifles during the Battle of Graveney Marsh on 27 September 1940. It was the last action between British and foreign military forces on British mainland soil. Between January 1943 and April 1944, a smaller scale reprisal bombing campaign was waged using Ju 88s against the British mainland. On 21 January, almost every available bomber on the Western Front was dispatched to attack London. Attacks continued against various British cities for months but the number of aircraft in each raid dwindled. In late April, in an attempt to disrupt preparations for the D-Day landings, Ju 88s were redirected towards British ports along the southern coast; these were largely ineffective and thus were abandoned within the space of a month. By August 1944, the Luftwaffe's Ju 88 force had been heavily diminished. The Balkans and Greece The Ju 88 was used by VIII Fliegerkorps during the German invasion of Yugoslavia in April 1941. That same month, the type was also used during the German invasion of Greece (Operation Marita); at the start of the conflict, several Ju 88s dropped mines along the approaches to the harbour of Piraeus and bombed ships in the vicinity, which took the port out of action for weeks. During May 1941, the German invasion of Crete commenced. On 22 May, numerous Ju 88s, along with various other bomber aircraft of the Luftwaffe, attacked vessels belonging to the Royal Navy's Mediterranean Fleet, reportedly sinking one cruiser, damaging two other cruisers and a single battleship in the process. Following the Italian surrender in 1943, Ju 88s were also used during the German invasion of the Italian-held Dodecanese Islands, which took place between September and November 1943. Eastern Front In advance of Operation Barbarossa, a combination of Ju 86s and Ju 88s were used to systematically map out the western portion of the Soviet Union as part of Germany's pre-invasion preparations. Due to the lack of sufficient numbers of Ju 87 Stukas, the Ju 88 was quickly employed in the direct ground support role. This decision resulted in severe losses being incurred from ground fire. Kampfgeschwader 1, Kampfgeschwader 76 and Kampfgeschwader 77 reported the loss of 18 Ju 88s over enemy territory on 23 June. and KG 77 reported the loss of a further four Ju 88s, of which 12 were 100% destroyed. In the north, the VVS North-Western Front lost 465 aircraft on the ground, 148 of them bombers, to the Ju 88s of KG 1. A further 33 were damaged. Out of a total of 1,720 aircraft deployed by the VVS Northern Front on 22 June, it lost 890 and a further 187 suffered battle damage in eight days. The Ju 88s units helped virtually destroy Soviet airpower in the northern sector. Again, the Ju 88 demonstrated its dive-bombing capability. Along with He 111s from KG 55, Ju 88s from KG 51 and 54 destroyed some 220 trucks and 40 tanks on 1 July, which helped repulse the Soviet South Western Front's offensive. The Ju 88s destroyed most rail links during interdiction missions in the area, allowing Panzergruppe 1 to maintain the pace of its advance. Ju 88 units operating over the Baltic states during the battle for Estonia inflicted severe losses on Soviet shipping, with the same dive-bombing tactics used over Norway, France and Britain. KGr 806 sank the Soviet destroyer Karl Marx on 8 August 1941 in Loksa Bay Tallinn. On 28 August the Ju 88s had more success when KG 77 and KGr 806 sank the 2,026 grt steamer Vironia, the 2,317 grt Lucerne, the 1,423 grt Atis Kronvalds and the ice breaker Krišjānis Valdemārs (2,250 grt). The rest of the Soviet "fleet", were forced to change course. This took them through a heavily mined area. As a result, 21 Soviet warships, including five destroyers, struck mines and sank. On 29 August, the Ju 88s accounted for the transport ships Vtoraya Pyatiletka (3,974 grt), Kalpaks (2,190 grt) and Leningradsovet (1,270 grt) sunk. In addition, the ships Ivan Papanin, Saule, Kazakhstan and the Serp i Molot were damaged. Some 5,000 Soviet soldiers were lost. Another key use of the Ju 88 was against the Arctic convoys bringing supplies to the Soviets via the ports of Murmansk and Archangel. Later convoys with heavier escorts, which sometimes included aircraft carriers, proved to be far more costly to attack. The Mediterranean During 1940, the first Ju 88s arrived in Sicily. Further units equipped with the type would be transferred to the theatre during 1941 and 1942. In December 1941, it was decided to launch an aerial campaign against the Allied-held island of Malta. During the Siege of Malta, Ju 88s sought out and attacked Allied shipping across the Mediterranean and also undertook bombing missions against the island itself. By March 1943, Ju 88 operations in the Mediterranean had become largely confined to night time bombing missions against ground targets. North Africa Ju 88s were used in the North African campaign, where they flew operations in support of the Axis forces in North Africa. Italian Campaign Prior to the Allied landings at Reggio and Salerno in early September 1943, there were a total of five Ju 88 units stationed in Italy. In December 1943, many of the Luftwaffe's remaining Ju 88-equipped units in Italy were transferred away to other fronts. The aircraft were used to equip No. 44 Sqn, which had previously operated Bristol Blenheims, but these were instead transferred to No. 42 Sqn. Due to the complexity of the Ju 88, the FAF spent most of 1943 training crews on the aircraft, and conducted only a handful of bombing missions. The most notable was a raid on the Lehto partisan village on 20 August 1943 (in which the whole squadron participated), and a raid on the Lavansaari air field (leaving seven Ju 88 damaged from forced landing in inclement weather). In the summer of 1943, the Finns noted stress damage on the wings. This had occurred when the aircraft were used in dive bombing. Restrictions followed: the dive brakes were removed and it was only allowed to dive at a 45-degree angle (compared to 60–80 degrees previously). In this way, they tried to spare the aircraft from unnecessary wear. in Vantaa One of the more remarkable missions was a bombing raid on 9 March 1944 against Soviet Long Range Aviation bases near Leningrad, when the Finnish aircraft, including Ju 88s, followed Soviet bombers returning from a night raid on Tallinn, catching the Soviets unprepared and destroying many Soviet bombers and their fuel reserves, and a raid against the aerosledge base at Petsnajoki on 22 March 1944. The whole bomber regiment took part in the defence against the Soviets during the fourth strategic offensive. All aircraft flew several missions per day, at both day and night, when the weather permitted. No. 44 Sqn was subordinated Lentoryhmä Sarko during the Lapland War (now against Germany), and the Ju 88s were used both for reconnaissance and bombing. The targets were mostly vehicle columns. Reconnaissance flights were also made over northern Norway. The last war mission was flown on 4 April 1945. After the wars, Finland was prohibited from using bomber aircraft with internal bomb stores. Consequently, the Finnish Ju 88s were used for training until 1948. The aircraft were then scrapped over the following years. No Finnish Ju 88s have survived, but an engine is on display at the Central Finland Aviation Museum, and the frame structure of a German Ju 88 cockpit hood is preserved at the Finnish Aviation Museum in Vantaa. ==Variants==

Ju 88A Main bomber type with Jumo 211 engines. ;Ju 88 A-0 :Pre-production aircraft. ;Ju 88 A-1 :Initial production variant. Jumo 211B-1 engines ;Ju 88 A-2 :Jumo 211 G-1 engines. ;Ju 88 A-3 :Conversion trainer. Dual controls and throttles, various instruments duplicated. ;Ju 88 A-4 :Improved variant. Longer wingspan, due to redesigned wingtips. Stronger defensive armament. Power provided by Jumo 211 J-1 or J-2 engines producing , driving wooden bladed propellers. Reinforced undercarriage. Provision for four external bomb racks. ;Ju 88 A-5. :This version actually predates the A-4. Earlier models of Ju 88 upgraded with longer wings and other equipment. Jumo 211B-1, G-1 or H-1 engines all rated at for take-off. ;Ju 88 A-6 :Was equipped with a balloon cable fender. A counterweight was mounted in the rear fuselage. Extremely vulnerable to fighter interception, most reverted to the normal A-5 version, fender and counterweight removed. ;Ju 88 A-7 :Dual control trainer based on the A-5 ;Ju 88 A-8 :This version had balloon cable cutting capabilities, crew reduced to three, Jumo 211F-1 engines ;Ju 88 A-11 :Factory built tropical version ;Ju 88 A-12 :Dual control trainer. Ventral gondola, dive brakes and all armament removed. ;Ju 88 A-13 :Low level assault version. Dive brakes and bomb sight removed. Additional armor for crew, engines and fuel tanks. Armament consisted of bombs and up to 16 MG 17 machine guns housed in gun pods. ;Ju 88 A-14 :An improved A-4 version, more armor for the crew, Kuto-Nase balloon cable cutters, bomb sight removed. ;Ju 88 A-15 :Based on the A-4, it featured an enlarged wooden bomb bay, capable of holding 3 tons of bombs. Ventral gondola removed, only two defensive MGs. It was rejected as the bomb bay "bulge" caused too much drag and a thus a reduction in speed. ;Ju 88 A-16 :Dual control trainer based on the A-14 ;Ju 88 A-17 :Dedicated torpedo bomber, no ventral gondola. One PVC torpedo rack under each wing replaced the two bomb racks. A long housing on the starboard side of the nose contained the torpedo aiming mechanisms. Crew of three. Ju 88B Prototype with all-new fully glazed "stepless" crew compartment nose, developed into Junkers Ju 188. ;Ju 88 B-0 :10 pre-production aircraft with "stepless" fully glazed nose. Ju 88C Zerstörer, fighter-bomber and night fighter, based on A-series, but with sheet metal nose. ;Ju 88 C-1 :Heavy fighter, 20 converted from A-1, Jumo 211 engines ;Ju 88 C-2 :Heavy fighter, 20 converted from A-5 ;Ju 88 C-3 :Heavy fighter with BMW 801A engines, one built ;Ju 88 C-4 :Heavy fighter, reconnaissance variant, based on A-5. 60 built and 60 converted from A-5 ;Ju 88 C-5 :Heavy fighter, like C-4 but with BMW 801 engines, up to four converted ;Ju 88 C-6 :Heavy fighter and Night fighter, based on A-4, Jumo 211J engines with , 900 built Ju 88D Long-range photo-reconnaissance variants, based on the Ju 88 A-4/A-5. ;Ju 88 D-1 :Long-range photo-reconnaissance variant based on Ju 88 A-4. ;Ju 88 D-2 :Long-range photo-reconnaissance variant based on Ju 88 A-5. ;Ju 88 D-3 :Tropicalized D-1. ;Ju 88 D-4 :Tropicalized D-2. ;Ju 88 D-5 :as D-1 but with VDM metal propellers instead of Junkers wooden propellers Ju 88G Night fighter, new fuselage with A-series' ventral Bola (Bodenlafette) gondola omitted, tail section from Ju 188, aerodynamically improved conformal gun pod for a quartet of forward-firing calibre, MG 151/20 autocannons below the former bomb bay. ;Ju 88 G-1 :BMW 801 radial engines with , FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 radar ;Ju 88 G-6 :Junkers Jumo 213A inverted V12 engines with , used either FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 90 MHz or FuG 218 Neptun 158/187 MHz frequency radar, either with the usual Hirschgeweih eight-dipole aerial setup or experimentally with the more aerodynamic Morgernstern tripled crossed-dipole aerials. Some very-late-war aircraft equipped with experimental FuG 240 Berlin cavity magnetron based 3 GHz radar, with dish antenna in bulbous solid nose. Optional with Schräge Musik upward firing guns with two guns. ;Ju 88 G-7 :Identical to G-6, but with Jumo 213E high-altitude engines, planned for use with FuG 218/220 with Morgenstern array or FuG 240. The G-7 was also to be installed with wings from the Junkers Ju 188. ; Ju 88G-3, 4 and 8 not produced. Ju 88H Long-range photo-reconnaissance, fighter variants, based on the stretched Ju 88G-series fuselage. ;Ju 88 H-1 :Long-range maritime reconnaissance variant, equipped with a FuG 200 Hohentwiel radar and a trio of remotely controlled cameras in the aft fuselage. ;Ju 88 H-2 :Fighter variant intended to attack Allied long range convoy escort aircraft armed with six Forward firing MG 151/20. ;Ju 88 H-3 :Ultra-long-range maritime reconnaissance variant similar to H-1. ;Ju 88 H-4 :Destroyer variant. Ju 88P Anti-tank and bomber destroyer variant with single Bordkanone series , , or twin calibre cannon in conformal ventral fuselage gun pod mount, which mandated removal of the Bola gondola under the cockpit section, conversion of A-series bomber. Produced in small series only, they were perceived as a failure for both anti-tank and anti-bomber use. ;Ju 88 P-1 :Heavy-gun variant fitted with single Bordkanone BK 7,5 cannon in ventral gun pod. Appeared in mid-1942 in small numbers. ;Ju 88 P-2 :Heavy-gun variant with twin Bordkanone BK 37 cannon in ventral gun pod. ;Ju 88 P-3 :Heavy-gun variant with twin Bordkanone BK 37 cannon in ventral gun pod, and additional armor. ;Ju 88 S-0 :Fitted with two BMW 801 G-2 engines, single dorsal gun and 14 SD65 bombs. ;Ju 88 S-1 :Fitted with two BMW 801 G-2 engines, the GM-1 boost system and could carry two SD1000 bombs externally. ;Ju 88 S-2 :Fitted with two turbocharged BMW 801J engines, wooden bomb bay extension as used on the Ju 88 A-15. ;Ju 88 S-3 :Fitted with two Jumo 213A engines and GM-1 boost system. Ju 88T Three-seat photo-reconnaissance version of S-series. ;Ju 88 T-1 :Based on the Ju 88 S-1 but with bomb bays fitted for extra fuel or GM-1 tanks. ;Ju 88 T-3 :Based on the Ju 88 S-3. ==Operators==

used as a highway strip, early 1945 ; • Finnish Air Force received 24 Ju 88 A-4 aircraft. • No. 44 Squadron ; • French Air Force operated aircraft captured in Toulouse repair depot and other captured by the RAF and USAAF handed over to the French. • French Navy (Postwar) ; • Luftwaffe ; • Royal Hungarian Air Force ; • Regia Aeronautica ; • Royal Romanian Air Force ; • Royal Air Force • No. 1426 Flight RAF operated at least five captured aircraft. ; • Soviet Air Force bought three Ju 88A-1 for evaluation in 1940 and operated captured aircraft. ; • Spanish Air Force bought ten aircraft and put into service another 15 interned during the war. ==Surviving aircraft==

Only two complete aircraft exist. They were both flown into British hands by defecting crews during the war. (Pictured in 2007) ;Ju 88 D-1/Trop, Werk Nr. 430650 :This is a long-range, photographic reconnaissance aircraft that was in the service of the Royal Romanian Air Force. On 22 July 1943, it was flown from Mariupol, Ukraine, to Cyprus by a Romanian pilot who wanted to defect to the Allied side. His original intention had been to fly to Syria, but strong winds blew him off-course. :In the US, it was registered as FE-1598 and used for examination and test flying from 1943 to 1944 at Wright Field. (Pictured in 2007) ;Ju 88 R-1, Werk Nr. 360043 :This aircraft is thought to have been built in mid–1942 as a model A bomber, before being converted to a model R–1 fighter in early 1943. It was flown to Scotland by its defecting crew in May 1943; two of the three crew on board (who may have been British agents) had taken the decision to defect after being ordered to shoot down a civilian BOAC Mosquito courier flight from Sweden to the UK. :The aircraft took off from Aalborg, Denmark on 9 May, landing at Kristiansand, Norway for refuelling, it then took off again, supposedly for a mission over the Skagerrak. The defecting crew instead flew west to Scotland while holding the third crewmember at gunpoint. The aircraft was detected by British radar as it approached the Scottish coast and two Spitfires from 165 Squadron were scrambled. They intercepted 360043 one mile inland, whereupon the Ju 88 lowered its undercarriage, dipped its wings and dropped flares, signalling the crew's intent to surrender. The Spitfires escorted 360043 to RAF Dyce, where it received slight damage from the airfield's anti-aircraft guns while attempting to land. The Spitfire pilots (an American and a Canadian) were mentioned in dispatches for taking the risk not to open fire on the Ju 88 upon interception. :The surrender of this aircraft was of great intelligence value at the time, as it was fitted with the latest UHF-band FuG 202 Liechtenstein BC A.I radar, for which a new form of the Window radar interference method, set up for UHF-band airborne radar jamming, was developed soon afterwards. The Ju 88R-1 was operated by the RAF's No. 1426 (Enemy Aircraft) Flight and evaluated in depth by various British groups, including the Royal Aircraft Establishment and the Fighter Interception Unit. It was used to assist in teaching enemy aircraft recognition skills prior to the D-Day landings, and was last flown in May 1945. In September 1954 and again in September 1955, it was displayed on Horseguards Parade for Battle of Britain week. The aircraft was restored in 1975 and fitted with a replica of its characteristic Matratze 32-dipole radar antenna array, as all its radar equipment had been removed during the war. In August 1978, it was moved to the Royal Air Force Museum Midlands, its present home. Towards the end of April, warmer weather made the frozen lake surface unusable for flying operations and a number of aircraft were abandoned on the ice, sinking into the lake when it melted completely. ;Ju 88 A-4, Werk Nr. 0881478 4D+AM (ex-Stammkennzeichen of BH+QQ) :This aircraft, formerly of 4.Staffel/Kampfgeschwader 30 is displayed at the Norwegian Aviation Museum at Bodø Airport. On 13 April 1942, it was returning from an attack on Soviet ships when it ran out of fuel. The crew bailed out in the vicinity of Snefjord but the aircraft continued its flight and, remarkably, was left comparatively intact after crash-landing on a hillside at Garddevarre in Finnmark in the far north of Norway. It remained there until recovered by the Norsk Luftfartsmuseum in 1988. ;Ju 88 A-5, Werk Nr. 0886146 with Stammkennzeichen of CV+VP :This aircraft is held at the Deutsches Technikmuseum near Berlin. :In June 1942, it was serving with a training unit, Kampffliegerschule 3 based on the German Baltic coast. One man drowned but the other, Willi Voss, was rescued by Norwegian civilians. However, he was subsequently captured, returned to Germany and executed in January 1943, even though some accounts claim Voss was forced by the other man to fly at gunpoint. The aircraft was recovered in August 2000. ==Specifications (Ju 88 A-4)==