The speech was highly anticipated and generally acclaimed by the Muslim world. However, some Muslims criticized it, both before and after it was delivered.
Pre-speech On 3 June,
Al-Qaeda released a video in which
Osama bin Laden strongly criticized Obama's foreign policy in the Middle East. He said that Obama "has followed the steps of his predecessor in antagonising Muslims ... and laying the foundation for long wars". He also added that "Obama and his administration have sowed new seeds of hatred against America." One day before, a video of Al-Qaeda number two
Ayman al-Zawahiri was posted to extremist websites, in which al-Zawahiri criticized Obama's policy, declaring "his bloody messages were received and are still being received by Muslims, and they will not be concealed by public relations campaigns or by farcical visits or elegant words." President Obama was also criticized by
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who delivered a speech to mark the 20th anniversary of the death of Ayatollah
Ruhollah Khomeini a few hours before Obama's speech. Khamenei commented on the pending speech declaring: "The nations of this part of the world ... deeply hate America. Even if they give sweet and beautiful [speeches] to the Muslim nation that will not create change. Action is needed."
Post-speech ,
Bambang Harymurti and
Nahum Barnea.|thumb|right
Palestinian Authority President
Mahmoud Abbas described the speech as "clear and frank... an innovative political step".
Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhum also welcomed the speech, saying "It had many contradictions, all the while reflecting tangible change." However, another
Hamas spokesman,
Ayman Taha, remarked after the speech that Obama is "no different" from
George W. Bush.
Amr Moussa, head of the
Arab League, hailed the speech, saying it "was balanced and offered a new vision of rapprochement regarding relations with Islamic states".
Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said the speech was a "direct, significant and brave appeal in which President Obama elucidated his vision and important universal principles, which he wishes to share with the Muslim world".
Israeli President Shimon Peres said the speech was "full of vision, a brave speech demanding a commitment to hard work on all sides involved in the promotion of the peace process in the Middle East.... The idea of peace was born in the Middle East as the basis of the three monotheistic religions – Christianity, Judaism and Islam – and the sons of Abraham must join hands in order to take on this challenge together, a sustainable peace in the Middle East." Other government officials criticized the speech for what they saw as glossing over
Palestinian terrorism. Science and Technology Minister
Daniel Hershkowitz said, "Obama completely overlooked that fact that the Palestinians have yet to abandon terror. The Israeli government is not some overlapping excess of the US administration."
Javier Solana,
European Union Common Foreign and Security Policy chief, praised the speech saying "It was a remarkable speech, a speech that without any doubt is going to open a new page in the relation with the Arab-Muslim world and I hope in the problems we have in so many theatres in the region." A Pakistan
Foreign Office spokesman praised and backed the speech saying, "We feel encouraged by President Obama’s remarks on
Palestine and Israel. It has been a long standing demand of Pakistan that the two-nation theory is the only way forward out of the Middle East crisis". He further went on to say, "We see this visit as a very positive step on the part of US because over the years there has been proverbial chasm between the Western and Islamic world. So this visit will be useful in bridging gaps between the Muslim and the Western world." An
Iraqi government spokesperson stated that the speech made a "positive direction" towards international dialogue.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the
Supreme Leader of
Iran, later made an address that did not mention Obama's speech directly, but he said, "[t]he new US government seeks to transform this image. I say firmly, that this will not be achieved by talking, speech and slogans". Iraqi
Shiite cleric
Moqtada al-Sadr also criticized it.
Christiane Amanpour of
CNN has also described the Muslim world's general reaction as very favorable and supportive. An Egyptian
Salafi scholar responded positively to Obama's address and used it as an opportunity to explain the link between Islamic civilisation, European civilisation and America, and Islamic principles. Some Arab commentators had a more negative response.
Rami Khouri, the editor of
The Daily Star and director of the Issam Fares Institute at the
American University of Beirut, argued that Obama gave "a lot of good, positive vibes" but, ultimately, it "was only rhetoric". He referred to what he saw as the hypocrisy of Obama praising human rights after meeting with Egyptian and Saudi leaders who have suppressed those same rights. He stated that the Muslim world is still waiting for Obama's words to "translate" into real policy.
Al Jazeera bureau chief Abderrahim Foukara made similar remarks, saying, "he talked about Palestinians killing Israelis, but he didn't talk a lot about Israelis killing Palestinians, especially in the context of the latest Israeli war on Gaza." Foukara also said, "he's come to us with his message of peace, but there are US forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and there are civilians being killed there by American forces." The fact that Obama never mentioned the word "terrorism" or "terror" was positively interpreted by many in the Muslim street, given that many of them see a '
war on terror' interchangeably as a '
war on Islam'.
American conservatives picked up on this, arguing that it weakened Obama's overall message.
House Republican leader
John Boehner also commented after the speech that Obama "seemed to place equal blame on the Israelis and the Palestinians.... I have concerns about that because Hamas is a terrorist organisation". As well, he said, "[w]here he continues to say he will sit down with the Iranians without any preconditions, I just think that that puts us in a position where America looks weak in the eyes of their rulers." A spokesman for
Human Rights Watch stated that "there were many things that were commendable ... but it is disappointing that when he talked about democracy in the Muslim world he wasn't more specific about some of the problems." He also stated that Obama refrained from talking about what the spokesman saw as the suppression of dissidents in Egypt. Three days after the speech, a strengthening of the pro-Western coalition in the
Lebanese general election with a loss for
Hezbollah was perceived by some foreign policy analysts to be at least in part due to Obama's speech. Several others stated that the speech played only a minor role compared to domestic events such as a last-minute appeal by Lebanon's Maronite patriarch asking Christians to vote against Hezbollah. For example, Lydia Khalil of the
Council on Foreign Relations commented that "[i]t is too soon to tell what the ultimate Obama effect will be." In a rejoinder to Obama's mentioning of the founding of Israel in the context of
the Holocaust, Netanyahu remarked, "[t]here are those who say that if the Holocaust had not occurred, the State of Israel would never have been established. But I say that if the State of Israel would have been established earlier, the Holocaust would not have occurred." Netanyahu stated that he would accept a
Palestinian state if
Jerusalem were to remain
the united capital of Israel, the Palestinians would have no army, and the Palestinians would give up their demand for a
right of return. He also stated that
existing Jewish settlements in the
West Bank will expand while their permanent status is up to further negotiation. The overture was quickly rejected by Palestinian leaders such as
Hamas spokesman
Sami Abu Zuhri, who called the speech "racist". About a week later, some unnamed Obama administration officials did make that case to
The Washington Post. ==Follow-up speeches and legacy==