Flegal is well known for a series of influential and highly cited articles on the prevalence of obesity in U.S. children and adults. In 1994, Flegal and her CDC co-authors were among the first to publish data indicating that the percentage of overweight people in the United States had been increasing from the 1980s onwards. Their paper appeared in the
Journal of the American Medical Association (
JAMA). In addition, she was a major contributor to the development of the 2000 CDC growth charts, used in the U.S. to assess the growth patterns of infants and children. The study received considerable opposition, in part because its conclusions differed from those of another paper published by senior CDC authors in March 2004. the CDC accepted Flegal's figures as correct. In 2013, Flegal was the lead author of a
systematic review and
meta-analysis published in
JAMA regarding the association of overweight and obesity with mortality. In a large sample, drawn from other countries as well as the U.S., overweight people had lower mortality relative to people of normal weight. The work examined the results of 97 studies that had included 2.88 million people.
Reaction Flegal's work has been criticized by
Walter Willett of the
Harvard School of Public Health, who called her 2013 meta-analysis paper a "pile of rubbish ... No one should waste their time reading it."
Jeffrey Scott Flier, the dean of
Harvard Medical School, convened a panel of experts to discuss the paper at Harvard on February 20, 2013. The panel's members suggested that Flegal's meta-analysis paper contained methodological errors, and criticized the selection criteria used for washing out too many people. Harvard's own subsequent analysis supported its position, but also received criticisms over how the researchers determined who to include. Many researchers accept the results of Flegal's 2005 and 2013 papers and see them as an illustration of what is known as the "
obesity paradox". In 2021, Flegal published a paper about her experiences with her 2005 and 2013 papers, concluding "Scientific findings should be evaluated on their merits, not on the basis of whether they fit a desired narrative." ==References==