Irving v Lipstadt libel trial (2000) MacDonald testified in the unsuccessful libel suit brought by the Holocaust denier
David Irving against the American historian
Deborah Lipstadt; he was the only witness for Irving who spoke on his behalf willingly. Irving had told the judge that MacDonald would need to be on the witness stand for three days, but his testimony only lasted a few hours. Irving, who argued his case on his own behalf without a lawyer, asked MacDonald if he (Irving) was an antisemite, a question to which MacDonald avoided giving a direct answer, instead saying: "I have had quite a few discussions with you and you almost never mentioned Jews - never in the general negative way." Irving asked if MacDonald "perceived the Jewish community as working in a certain way in order to suppress a certain book" and MacDonald responded in the affirmative, asserting there were "several tactics the Jewish organizations have used." Deborah Lipstadt's lawyer
Richard Rampton thought MacDonald's testimony on behalf of Irving was of so little help to Irving that he did not bother to
cross examine him. MacDonald later commented in an article for the
Journal of Historical Review, published by the
Institute for Historical Review, a
Holocaust-denying organisation, that Lipstadt and Jewish groups were attempting to restrict access to Irving's work because it was against Jewish interests and agenda.
Steven Pinker, the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University, wrote that MacDonald's work fails "basic tests of scientific credibility." Reviewing MacDonald's
Separation and Its Discontents in 2000
Zev Garber, Chair of Jewish Studies at Los Angeles Valley College, writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the "dual Torah", meaning both the written and oral traditions of Judaism, is the blueprint of eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as "provoked by Jews themselves." Garber concludes that MacDonald's "rambling who-is-who-isn't roundup of Jews responsible for the 'Jewish Problem' borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation." In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at
Brandeis University, wrote "Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald's Research Techniques", a paper in which he notes that one of MacDonald's sources, Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates antisemitic sentiments and actions. "At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz's research, but MacDonald's use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings", Lieberman wrote. Lieberman accused MacDonald of dishonestly using lines from the work of Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving's
Uprising, published in 1981 for the 25th anniversary of
Hungary's failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the
Culture of Critique: Lieberman, who said that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding that "the passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, 'Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.'" Most academics have rejected MacDonald's views about Judaism and race as being unworthy of legitimization or serious attention. Joan Braune, a hate studies scholar who has also written about the
Frankfurt School, wrote an analysis of "
Cultural Marxism", an antisemitic conspiracy theory, focusing on MacDonald and two others as among the "main proponents of the theory in the United States today". MacDonald writes about "Cultural Marxism" in the third volume of his trilogy, describing it as a Jewish group evolutionary strategy adopted initially by the Frankfurt School that, MacDonald claims, works by appearing to adopt universalist positions (such as social justice) as a ruse to defend Jewish interests by shaming white people into undermining their own race. Braune concludes that "The Culture of Critique is an exercise in circular reasoning and propaganda, not serious scholarship. Its attempts at 'science' are laughable at best", and notes that it unironically quotes Hitler's
Mein Kampf as a source on Jewish behaviour.
Criticism by the ADL and the SPLC Mark Potok of the
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) claims of MacDonald that "he put the anti-Semitism under the guise of scholarly work... Kevin MacDonald's work is nothing but gussied-up anti-Semitism. At base it says that Jews are out to get us through their agenda... His work is bandied about by just about every
neo-Nazi group in America." The
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) includes MacDonald in its list of American extremists, "Extremism in America", and wrote a report on MacDonald's views and ties. According to the ADL, his views on Jews mimic those of anti-Semites from the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Heidi Beirich wrote in an SPLC Intelligence Report in April 2007: MacDonald claims the SPLC has misrepresented and distorted his work. == CSULB comments ==