A makeshift memorial was set up on Trierer Strasse. The Säubrennerkirmes retained increased police patrols as a security measure in the years after Ovsjannikov's death. Prosecutor of Trier
Higher Regional Court Peter Fritzen denied the allegations levied by Harrison's defense. Contradicting the appeal that led to the suppression of the confession, Harrison's attorney Grover Baxley claimed that only "German Polizei" had handled the interrogation of Harrison, that officers told him that he was held for aggravated assault rather than homicide, and that the confession was coerced. Fritzen stated that American investigators were present and talked with the suspects, that police disclosed the homicide investigation to Harrison and that no force was used by police. The prosecutor's office saw no merit in the accusations based on limited documentations provided by U.S. military authorities. The parents of Ovsjannikov accused Harrison's attorney of establishing the defense on a false basis. Rhineland-Palatinate Minister of Justice
Herbert Mertin has ordered a re-examination of the validity of handover of Harrison and Cain to NATO custody. Although Mertin died in office only three months after the order in February 2025, the process of reevaluating the NATO SOFA by the state ministry of justice is ongoing as of January 2026. During the 202nd plenary session of the
Bundestag on 4 December 2024,
North Rhine-Westphalia MP Sevim Dağdelen asked
Minister of State Anna Lührmann whether the federal government had plans to review the NATO SOFA and the in light of the recent acquittal in Ovsjannikov's killing. Lührmann maintained that a review and prosecution of U.S. troops in general would be a matter to be overseen by the individual states. Ovjannikov's family is seeking to abolish the status of forces agreement in Germany through state and federal courts, as well as the
European Court of Justice. In January 2026, Ovsjnannikov's parents filed a lawsuit against the Trier
Public Prosecutor's Office. The thirty-page suit alleges that the prosecutor's office had failed to invoke Article 19 § 3 of the NATO SOFA Supplementary Agreement, according to which Germany can regain judiciary from NATO i.e. the United States in cases of "essential concerns of the German administration of justice", which include homicide offences. The Koblenz Prosecutor's Office argues that the Ovsjannikov family lacks
standing for legal action in relation to the case, as the NATO Status of Force Agreement covered arrangement between nations and their militaries, and does not consider private persons, including individual
victims' rights. Approval of the lawsuit is pending with
Koblenz Higher Regional Court. On 22 January 2025, Rhineland-Palatinate Minister of Justice
Philipp Fernis announced that while the NATO agreement itself could only be modified by the federal government, the state was planning to make it easier to invoke a return of judiciary over cases that fall under the agreement's purview and that
victims of crimes and their dependents were allowed to file civil cases. Filing of such a return would no longer have to go through the state ministry of justice and be handled under direct authority of the public prosecutor's offices. The state ministry also recommended to police that should make exclusive use of sworn interpreters in severe criminal cases involving U.S. military personnel. For over a month, there were regular protests outside the Spangdahlem Air Base and the
Landtag of Rhineland-Palatinate by hundreds of locals who criticized the verdict. Harrison was still working at the air base as of November 2024, but the U.S. Air Force were in the process of discharging him. In summer 2025, the killing gained renewed interest in Japan, where cases of serious crimes committed by U.S. military personnel stationed on their territory is commonly reported on, often with criticism in regards to lenient or a complete lack of punishment through judicial authorities. == See also ==