Venezuelan film critic Sergio Monsalve said that the movie, along with Chalbaud's late work
El Caracazo,
Días de poder and
Zamora: Tierra y hombres libres, tarnished Chalbaud's career and accomplishments as a filmmaker, saying that they were produced to please the
Bolivarian Revolution and the ruling party, and panned the film. Writing for
Revista Florencia, Crissia Contreras criticized several aspects of the film, particularly its script and visual effects. Contreras writes that Cipriano Castro's and
Juan Vicente Gómez' dialogues lacked depth and that Britto fails to depicts them faithfully, something particularly troublesome being two of the most important characters in Venezuelan history: Castro, leader of the
Restorative Liberal Revolution, and his
compadre Gómez, who would rule Venezuela for 27 years and described by writer
Francisco Herrera Luque as the founder of the modern Venezuelan state. Crissia also stated that the movie's special effects were bad, suggesting that the country's film production was far from acceptable standards, and that extras, and even main actors, failed to depict fundamental aspects of the Liberal Restorative army, such as the
Andean accents. == References ==