Following the accident, the MMA temporarily ceased operations on its lines between Lac-Mégantic and
Jackman, Maine, and an additional five on July30; these workers had not received severance and vacation pay owed. In Maine, 64 MMA employees were laid off as a result of the derailment. On August23, 2013, the
Federation of Canadian Municipalities rail safety working group urged the Federal government to act swiftly on rail safety. The FCM working group had three recommendations: • Help equip and support municipal first responders, and keep them informed of the type of dangerous goods being transported by rail through their communities in order to help plan for emergencies. • Ensure federal and industry policies and regulations address municipalities' rail safety concerns and include those concerns in risk assessment and policy development on rail safety. • Solidify the regulation of third-party liability insurance for rail companies so the costs of rail disasters are not borne by local taxpayers. In
Montmagny, a community on the
CN line through
Lévis, mayor Jean-Guy Desrosiers expressed concern about the dangerous materials trains which appeared increasingly frequently after the former CP line through Lac-Mégantic was inoperable; neither the city nor police and fire responders were informed of the content of these shipments, leaving questions as to the readiness of the municipality to respond to further derailments.
Magog mayor Vicky May Hamm made an
Access to Information Act enquiry for track inspection data, train scheduling information and products transported. The federal response acknowledged that inspections found three problematic track sections, but provided no further information. Sherbrooke made similar demands. While US authorities made Maine track inspection data available quickly, the Canadian government was expected to take eight months to a year to comply with the
Access to Information Act enquiries. According to the
Brandon Sun, the
Brandon Police Service and Brandon Fire Department indicate they are not provided dangerous goods lists by rail companies.
Côte-Saint-Luc, Quebec, mayor
Anthony Housefather expressed concern in a recent council meeting about the lack of data: “I'm not the federal government, I didn't determine if the railways have an obligation to provide [the information] to the municipalities or anyone else,” the mayor added. “The federal government should be doing that. I had one opportunity to get it for our city to work on our emergency measures plan and make sure that we’re prepared, and I prefer to have the information than not have it.... Until such time as the federal government adopts more stringent requirements on the railways, anything we receive as information as a city comes from the sufferance of the railway, meaning we need to have a good relationship with the railway to get anything because they have no legal obligation under federal law to provide it to us,”
Farnham's town council passed a resolution asking that the operation of a rail line that cuts the town in two be suspended until
Transport Canada conducts a full inspection of the rails; Farnham mayor Josef Hüsler also requested subsidies to move the rail yard outside the town and replace a level crossing at
Quebec Route 104 with an
overpass.
Quebec City mayor
Régis Labeaume offered that city's continued support for the reconstruction effort (the city already had emergency workers on-site) and called for the immediate construction of 1–2 km of new track to reconnect Lac-Mégantic's industrial park to the rails, bypassing the damaged downtown. He praised local mayor Colette Roy-Laroche unequivocally while denouncing Rail World CEO Burkhardt as a "corporate bum" whose modus operandi of taking large dividends in profit while leaving company coffers nearly empty would allow the railway to declare bankruptcy, leaving taxpayers to foot the huge cost of rebuilding Lac-Mégantic. Quebec City also sent an expert from its
museum of civilisation to identify artefacts in the wreckage which should be preserved for inclusion in a future monument, memorial park or exhibit.
Vaudreuil-Dorion mayor Guy Pilon asked that municipalities be permitted to limit the speed of trains in populated areas, as homes and schools built 50 years ago near rail lines then carrying wood, grain and cereals are now endangered by high-speed hazardous goods trains.
Dourdan, France, mayor Olivier Leglois offered condolences to the mayor of Lac-Mégantic at the request of Le Chêne et l'Érable, a Dourdan local organisation supporting the
sister city link between the two towns. While Dourdan provided no immediate aid, its local government intended to support secondary efforts such as reconstruction of the town's library, While the local archives could not be replaced, various universities and local groups in Quebec collected books for a new Bibliothèque Mégantic. Sister city
Farmington, Maine, sent firefighters to fight the blaze, raised over $6000 in local donations in the first few days after the derailment and had local officials meet with their Méganticois counterparts to offer aid and support. Both the municipality and the Farmington library contacted their direct counterparts in other Maine municipalities to enlist their aid.
Provincial reaction During a July 11 visit, Premier Marois criticized the rail company's response, while announcing a $60-million fund for survivor assistance and rebuilding. Ten days later, the federal government had yet to commit to any specific aid for the stricken community, despite requests from the municipality for help to rebuild damaged infrastructure and reroute the rails outside the stricken downtown. During an annual premiers' conference, the Council of the Federation, provincial leaders called for stricter requirements for
liability insurance for rail carriers, real-time information on content and location of dangerous goods trains for officials at all levels of government and a federally supported national emergency response program. The premiers of Quebec and all four Atlantic provinces, as well as all six
New England governors, called for stricter federal regulation of dangerous goods by rail in both nations. A 2001 Quebec law (Article 8 of the Loi sur la sécurité civile) for which the corresponding regulations were never enacted was cited on August19, 2013, by
Vision Montréal, a municipal political party. Under that law, a company conducting activities or holding materials which could cause a major disaster would be required to disclose these risks to municipalities, indicating the potential damage and any contingency plans.
Maine and United States In Maine, where oil-by-rail attracted environmental protests, the state legislature voted 91–52 for a study on transportation of crude oil through the state. The proposed study was vetoed by the state's governor and the
Maine Department of Transportation (Maine DOT) had no plans to review movements of crude oil through Maine. Maine governor
Paul Lepage advocated federal review of all procedures affecting rail safety on both sides of the border. Maine's
US representatives Michaud and
Pingree proposed The Safe Freight Act, a federal bill requiring two-person crews on freight trains, and demanded the older
DOT-111 design be replaced by sturdier cars for dangerous goods shipments. The U.S. Federal Railroad Administration launched a full re-inspection of the of the Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway's track in Maine. A committee of local mayors representing the Quebec municipalities along the line (Lac-Mégantic, Farnham, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Sherbrooke, Magog,
Sutton and
Cowansville) called for a similar investigation by the government of Canada. The FRA also established an "Emergency Order establishing additional requirements for attendance and securement of certain freight trains and vehicles on mainline track or mainline siding outside of a yard or terminal" on August2, 2013. Maine DOT established
contingency plans for local industry which used MMA's rail lines. The state contacted every Maine freight rail operator, seeking a trustee who could keep the line running should MMA cease operations.
Canadian federal impact On July7, Canadian Prime Minister
Stephen Harper described the area as a "war zone" and claimed the
federal Cabinet would have the proper authorities "to conduct a very complete investigation and act on the recommendations". The disaster drew criticisms of federal
deregulation of the rail industry in Canada. The
Public Service Alliance of Canada, which represented inspectors at Transport Canada, objected to a pattern of fewer inspections,
deferred maintenance of rail lines already in poor condition and an increasing number of cars on each train, going as far as to label the government of Canada as "complicit" in the disaster. Leaders of two federal opposition parties, the
New Democratic Party and the
Bloc Québécois, called for Parliament to examine rail safety in Canada with possible implementation of stricter regulation. The
Conservative Party opposed a critical review of Transport Canada's oversight of the railways, Millions of dollars budgeted to Transport Canada for rail safety in
fiscal years 2011–12 and 2012–13 remain unspent. In Canada, federal regulation requires rail carriers carry adequate third-party liability insurance but does not legislate a specific dollar minimum in coverage. The amount of coverage is not disclosed to the public nor to municipalities along the line. MMA was insured for $25 million in liability; a second policy exists but only covers damage to MMA equipment and rolling stock. The federal government had been subject to intense
lobbying by CPR and the
Railway Association of Canada prior to the disaster, with railway association lobbyists meeting with multiple federal officials “to inform about the movement of dangerous goods, including voluntary and regulatory requirements, volumes, customers and safety measures to assure them that current regulations for dangerous goods transportation are sufficient.” A similar situation exists in the US, with nearly $47 million/year in lobbying to delay safety measures such as
positive train control. The Environmental Petitions process of the federal Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development is one avenue for citizen redress, whereby the Minister is required to answer within 120 days. to address weaknesses in the oversight of the transportation of dangerous goods. Deficiencies identified by the
AGC in 2011 included: Marie France Dagenais, director-general of the Transportation of Dangerous Goods division of
Transport Canada, prioritises her job as follows: "naturally we do it in cooperation with the industry and also representatives with the U.S. government because we want uniform standards in Canada and the United States” and thus explains the five-year delay to develop standards in her department. Meanwhile, some representatives with the U.S. government were participating in drug use and sexual activity with employees from the very energy firms they were to be regulating. However, it would appear that many of the issues raised by the audit are not new. “An internal audit identified these same concerns over five years ago. The department has yet to correct some of the key weaknesses in its regulatory oversight practices,” stated former environment commissioner Scott Vaughan in July 2013. The Energy, Environment and Natural Resources (ENEV) committee decided in November 2012 to report on energy safety issues and had input from more than 50 individuals or groups as it crossed Canada. The chair of the committee, Sen.
Richard Neufeld, said that the entire committee was supportive of minimum insurance coverage: “If they can't afford their liability coverage, maybe they shouldn't be in the business.” The committee noted that "pipeline companies are subject to a minimum of $1 billion available in bonds, lines of credit, third-party guarantees and liability insurance.", • The federal government should launch an arm's-length review of the railway regulatory framework, standards and industry practices. • Transport Canada should apply appropriate minimum liability coverage thresholds to ensure rail companies have the financial capacity to cover damages caused by a major incident. • The National Energy Board and Transport Canada should create a web portal that includes interactive maps indicating detailed information on spills and incidents for pipelines, tankers and railcars. It should include the types of product released and the cause of the incident. Stricter safety requirements, including two-person crews and additional requirements for hand brakes, were announced in October 2014. In February 2015, the federal Minister of Transport
Lisa Raitt announced a two-year phase-in of stricter liability for rail carriers, in which a
Class I railway handling hazardous material could be required to carry a billion dollars in liability insurance. In 2018, Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau announced a joint federal-provincial funding of a
railway bypass so the railway would avoid the town. After negotiations came to an impasse, in February 2023, the federal government took steps to begin the
expropriation process. ==Litigation==