The difficulty expressed in placing the species in the proper family is due to the unique floral morphology. How this inverted position of the
androecium and
gynoecium evolved is unknown, but some studies have posed hypotheses. Davidse and Martínez suggested that
L. schismatica could be one of
Richard Goldschmidt's "
hopeful monsters", meaning that the inverted floral morphology could have arisen from a macromutation in the genes that control floral development. It is also possible that
chromosomal repatterning was the origin of this species. Since the original description and early work on this species in the 1990s, other field work has revealed some instances of
L. schismatica flowers that were unisexual. The closely related species
Triuris brevistylis was discovered to be mostly
dioecious, but a few individuals were located that had bisexual flowers, with the flower arrangement inverted, in the same way as that of
L. schismatica flowers. This discovery led the authors of the study to conclude that the inverted floral morphology evolved before
L. schismatica and
T. brevistylis diverged. Isolated populations during the
Quaternary Period (around five million years ago), when temperatures in the Lacandon lowland rainforest were six to eight
°C (10.8 to 14.4
°F) cooler than today. This hypothesis is supported by the geographic distribution, in which
L. schismatica is restricted to the warmer lowlands and
T. brevistylis has a distribution in the cooler highlands. ==References==