The
English once widely claimed as history, an original peopling of the
isle — at the time a land only of fantastical
giants — by descendants of the above-mentioned Eneas, perhaps via Latinus, and at least with Latinus as
step-family of an
ancestor, though even in the time of the
Renaissance, a non-English
audience as well at least one English
writer found details of the stories less than convincing. The island known later as
Britain, was also previously known as
Alba, similarity of name supporting connection to the city of
Alba in Italy, said to have been built by Alcanius, son of Eneas, and third ruler of the Latins after Latinus, being either his grandson or step-grandson. Even if one ignored obviously far-fetched elements of this
foundation myth of Britain,
Johannes Rastell writing in
1529 questioned, along these lines: Supposing the original Brits were descendants of a line of Latin kings — Brute the son of Silvius, son of Alcanius, son of Eneas who came to the
Italian peninsula from Troy — then why should such a fact have escaped record in the
writings of
Julius Caesar when he had personally
surveyed the lands there he had conquered for Rome by
48 BC? And indeed, why should the son Brutus have escaped from Latin histories altogether, given they did deal with Silvius and Alcanius, and 'all theyr childera & what became of them & how they endyd that succeeded them as kyngis'? Other details he found were able to be discounted without resort to factual records, or with only very few facts needed other than everyday experience. Were the early inhabitants of Britain giants, descended from
the Devil in union with 32 daughters of a king
Dioclisian of Syria? To Rastell, if the devil had power to sow such seeds at the earlier time, then why not in his own time? Where were the giants today? Other fanciful elements he reduced by
logical deduction from intuitive
psychological insights, for example the greatly diminished chance of 32 daughters
married to 32 kings on a single day, and all cooperating to
kill those 32 husbands in a single night; or in combination with analysis of
logistical realities, such as the suggested
voyage of all 32 murderous
widows to Britain without dispersion or diversion, over three thousand miles. One renaissance writer Rastell was further able to discount the likelihood of any factuality to that ancient tale, due to his failure to discover, after diligent research, any authentic record of its origin or explanation as to why such record should be absent.
Further reading • One surviving version of the
Brut chronicle is a late Middle Ages manuscript, known as the
St Albans Chronicle. == See also ==