Laughter in literature, although considered understudied by some, is a subject that has received attention in the written word for millennia. The use of
humor and laughter in literary works (for example the
homeric laughter (ἄσβεστος γέλως, ásbestos gélōs, "unceasing laughter") in Greek epics like the
Iliad and
Odyssey) has been studied and analyzed by many thinkers and writers, from the
Ancient Greek philosophers onward.
Henri Bergson's
Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (
Le rire, 1901) is a notable 20th-century contribution.
Ancient Herodotus For
Herodotus, laughers can be distinguished into three types: • Those who are innocent of wrongdoing, but ignorant of their own vulnerability • Those who are
mad • Those who are overconfident According to
Donald Lateiner, Herodotus reports about laughter for valid literary and historiological reasons. "Herodotus believes either that both nature (better, the gods' direction of it) and human nature coincide sufficiently,
or that the latter is but an aspect or analogue of the former, so that to the recipient the outcome is suggested."
Hobbes Thomas Hobbes wrote, "The passion of laughter is nothing else but sudden glory arising from sudden conception of some eminency in ourselves, by comparison with the infirmity of others, or with our own formerly."
Schopenhauer Philosopher
Arthur Schopenhauer devotes the 13th chapter of the first part of his major work,
The World as Will and Representation, to laughter.
Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche distinguishes two different purposes for the use of laughter. In a positive sense, "man uses the comical as a therapy against the restraining jacket of logic, morality and reason. He needs from time to time a harmless demotion from reason and hardship and in this sense laughter has a positive character for Nietzsche." Laughter can, however, also have a negative connotation when it is used for the expression of social conflict. This is expressed, for instance, in
The Gay Science: "Laughter – Laughter means to be
schadenfroh, but with clear conscience." "Possibly Nietzsche's works would have had a totally different effect, if the playful, ironical and joking in his writings would have been factored in better."
Bergson In
Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, French philosopher
Henri Bergson, renowned for his philosophical studies on materiality, memory, life and
consciousness, tries to determine the laws of the comic and to understand the fundamental causes of comic situations. His method consists in determining the causes of the comic instead of analyzing its effects. He also deals with laughter in relation to human life, collective imagination and
art, to have a better knowledge of society. One of the theories of the essay is that laughter, as a collective activity, has a social and moral role, in forcing people to eliminate their vices. It is a factor of uniformity of behaviours, as it condemns ludicrous and eccentric behaviours.
Ludovici Anthony Ludovici developed the thoughts of Hobbes even further in
The Secret of Laughter. His conviction is that there's something sinister in laughter, and that the modern omnipresence of humour and the idolatry of it are signs of societal weakness, as instinctive resort to humour became a sort of escapism from responsibility and action. Ludovici considered laughter to be an evolutionary trait and he offered many examples of different triggers for laughter with their own distinct explanations.
Bellieni Carlo Bellieni examined laughter in an essay published in
New Ideas in Psychology. He wrote we can strip back laughter to a three-step process. First, it needs a situation that seems odd and induces a sense of incongruity (bewilderment or panic). Second, the worry or stress the incongruous situation has provoked must be worked out and overcome (resolution). Third, the actual release of laughter acts as an all-clear siren to alert bystanders (relief) that they are safe. == Other animals ==