Major Pillar Edict 1 Asoka's principle of protection of the people.
Major Pillar Edict 2 Defines dhamma as a minimum of sins, many virtues, compassion, liberality, truthfulness and purity.
Major Pillar Edict 3 Abolishes sins of harshness, cruelty, anger, pride etc.
Major Pillar Edict 4 Deals with duties of Rajukas.
Major Pillar Edict 5 A list of animals and birds which should not be killed on some days, and another list of animals which have not to be killed at all occasions. Describes the release of 25 prisoners by Asoka.
Major Pillar Edict 6 Dhamma Policy.
Major Pillar Edict 7 Works done by Asoka for Dhamma Policy. He says that all sects desire both self-control and purity of mind. This edict only appears on the
Delhi-Topra pillar, at the fortress of
Feroz Shah Kotla in
New Delhi.
7th Edict: issues of authenticity of
Feroz Shah Kotla,
New Delhi, and unseen anywhere else, in direct contrast with the other six pillar edicts, which are inscribed on numerous pillars. • This edict appears to be a compilation, a "hodgepodge", of parts of the other pillar edicts and also parts of the
Major Rock Edicts. • The script and layout of the text (forming the end of a column, continued by a band around the pillar rather than the normal text in columns only) is of a much lower quality than the other edicts, although it is supposed to have been written only one year after the 6th Edict, in the year 27. The lettering is also quite irregular, lightly inscribed (even "scribbled") and different in shape. • This edict claims the existence of several religious organizations: the Buddhist
Samgha (a comparatively late term, whether the ancient term
Sramanas is used in other inscriptions such as the
Major Rock Edicts, and neither terms are even used in the other Major Pillar Edicts themselves), the
Brahmanas (never mentioned in the other Major Pillar Edicts), and, uniquely among all the
edicts of Ashoka, the
Ajivikas and
Nirgranthas (
Jains). This may be an attempt by some faiths, especially the
Ajivikas and
Nirgranthas, to claim Mauryan antiquity, possibly during the time of the
Kushan Empire (2-3rd century CE). • The edict contains many repetitions, consistent with assembling multiple copies of existing inscriptions. Most strangely, the opening royal statement "King Priyadarsin, Beloved of the Gods, says..." is repeated nine times in the 7th Edict, whereas it only appears once at the beginning of all the other known edicts. However, Beckwith's theories are not accepted by mainstream scholarship: many of his methodologies and interpretations concerning early Buddhism, inscriptions, and archaeological sites have been criticized by other scholars, such as
Johannes Bronkhorst and
Osmund Bopearachchi. According to
Patrick Olivelle, Beckwith's theory is "an outlier and no mainstream Ashokan scholar would subscribe to that view." ==Possible derived inscriptions in Aramaic==