Proposal The local geology of the
Irwell Valley, which included steep sided valleys with fast flowing rivers subject to rapid flooding and dry seasons, confined local river transport to the
Mersey and Irwell Navigation, west of Manchester. Financial unrest and British involvement in the
American Revolutionary War restricted local transport investment to road improvements. With the arrival of more favourable conditions, including the end of the war, a proposal for a canal to link the towns of Manchester, Bolton and Bury was mooted.
Matthew Fletcher had in 1789 been employed as a technical advisor and had surveyed the route of the proposed canal, but the first public notice came from Manchester on 4 September 1790. The initial proposal probably came from a group in Bolton, with the support of the Mersey and Irwell Navigation Company. A meeting was "intended to be holden at the House of Mr Shawe, the Bull's Head in Manchester aforesaid, on Monday, the twentieth day of this instant, September, at eleven o'clock in the forenoon", where "Surveys, Plans, Levels, Estimates and Proposals" would be presented. A further meeting on 16 September, held in Bolton, appointed a committee of six Boltonians chaired by
Lord Grey de Wilton to attend at Manchester. A series of resolutions at this meeting followed a discussion of the route, and authorised the necessary actions to bring the plan into fruition, which included the petitioning of
Parliament for the required
bill.
Hugh Henshall was asked to survey the proposed route of the canal. At another meeting in Bury, on 13 October 1790,
Hugh Henshall gave a written report on the canal, and stated that his plan would not require water from the river in times of drought, but that floods and rivulets would supply his reservoirs. He suggested that mill owners could be protected by a suitable clause in the bill, and such a clause was duly obtained by
Robert Peel. Businesses in Bolton were concerned with the location of the canal terminus, and proposed the construction of a tunnel to allow the terminus to be built closer to the town centre. Ralph Fletcher, spokesman for those concerned, reported on this proposal to the committee, although no tunnel was built.
Subscribers and funding A document entitled "A list of subscribers to the intended Bolton Bury and Manchester Canal Navigation", now kept in the
Greater Manchester County Record Office, lists notable subscribers including the
Earl of Derby,
Lord Grey de Wilton,
Matthew Fletcher, and
Robert Peel. The 95 investments ranged from £100 to £3,000, and many were made
by proxy. The total sum of investments was £47,700; £5 per £100
share was initially paid, with an additional £10 call made by 10 August 1791. Similar share calls were made at regular intervals over the following years. The first dividend of 4% was paid in July 1812, with regular payments following thereafter.
Work begins Following a parliamentary survey of the route by Charles McNiven, the bill received
royal assent on 13 May 1791 The act allowed the company to raise £47,000, with shares of £100. The intention was that at
Prestolee the route would divide into two branches (
arms), with one branch towards Bolton and the other to Bury, but it would not, however, join the River Irwell. •
Lord Grey de Wilton, Heaton House, Lancashire •
Sir John Edensor Heathcote, Longton, Newcastle, Staffordshire •
Thomas Butterworth Bayley esq. — Hope, Salford • Robert Andrews esq —
Rivington • James Wareing, Gentleman, Knowsley •
Matthew Fletcher (Mine owner, Clifton) • Peter Wright, Gentleman, Manchester • William Marsden, Merchant, Manchester •
Charles McNiven, Gentleman, Manchester •
Hugh Henshall, Longpost, Staffordshire • John Pilkington, Merchant, Manchester The meeting secured a resolution that "Matthew Fletcher and Mr McNiven shall dispatch or procure 100 wheelbarrows and as many planks as they shall think necessary for the use and accommodation of the canal navigation". Further meetings took place from 26 to 29 July. Matthew Fletcher was ordered to meet with land owners to discuss the purchase of any land along the route of the canal, and with this in mind, on 30 July 1791 John Seddon of Sandy Lane was ordered to survey the line of the canal beginning within the estate of John Edenson Heathcote, and ending at the southern extremity of the
Reverend Dauntesey's estate. Fletcher and Henshall were ordered to contact people and companies in the building trade to discuss construction. the company proposed to extend the canal from Bury through
Littleborough, and to connect with the Rochdale Canal at Sladen. The new route, known as the Bury and Sladen Canal, was intended as a rival scheme to the proposed Rochdale link into Manchester. A survey was also carried out on a proposed extension from Sladen to
Sowerby Bridge. The company also considered links to the
Leeds and Liverpool Canal and the
Mersey and Irwell Navigation. These plans would have substantially increased the trans-Pennine traffic using the company's canal, and caused a potential loss of traffic and revenue on the nearby
Bridgewater Canal. With this in mind, the owner of the Bridgewater Canal, the
Duke of Bridgewater, agreed to allow the Rochdale Canal Company to connect to his canal at Manchester. Despite the persistence of the canal company, the Rochdale Canal plan won the day and in 1797 the company abandoned the Bury and Sladen Canal plan. After several years of construction, on 9 January 1794 an agreement was reached with the Leeds and Liverpool Canal Company to create a link from the Bolton arm of the canal to the Leeds and Liverpool Canal at Red Moss, near
Horwich. This agreement required significant design changes to allow the canal to carry the wider boats used on the broad gauge Leeds and Liverpool Canal, Although the necessary changes were implemented, the route of the Leeds and Liverpool Canal was altered and the link was not built. In the same year the
Haslingden Canal link to the Leeds and Liverpool Canal was proposed, from the Bury arm of the canal. Although authorised by
Haslingden Canal Act 1794 (
34 Geo. 3. c. 77), it too was never built. The canal company remained hopeful of a link between the two canals, but all hope of this was lost when on 21 June 1819 the
Leeds and Liverpool Canal Branch and Railway Act 1819 (
59 Geo. 3. c. cv) was enacted to create a link between the
Leigh extension of the
Bridgewater Canal, and the Leeds and Liverpool Canal. A report entitled "A Statement of the Situation of the Works of the Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal, on the Eighteenth of December, 1795." gives details of the progress of the works, including details of bridges, cuttings, raised bankings and aqueducts. Much of the document details the work required to convert the canal to broad gauge. A length between Oldfield Lane in Salford and Giants Seat Locks in Outwood was navigable with of water. The remaining work included strengthening work to the banks, an increase of water depth to , and the gravelling of half of the towpath. Between Giants Seat locks and
Ringley Bridge two locks had been erected, with a small section of canal to be broadened before becoming navigable. From Ringley Bridge to Prestolee Aqueduct one lock had been erected. Nob End Locks were still under construction but mostly complete, although the basin at the bottom had not yet been dug. The stretch to Bolton had at this time been widened, with several bridges requiring further work, incomplete embankments, construction of a weir, and gravelling of the towpath. On the Bury arm, almost the entire length had been dug, and walls to support the canal along the bank of the Irwell had been built. Some widening of previously narrow sections had yet to be undertaken, none of the towpath had been gravelled, and no fences had been erected along the towpath. Significant parts of the canal were completed by 1796, including the stretch up to Bury in October of that year. much of the canal opened for business. The connection to
Fletcher's Canal was completed in 1800, but with the failure of the scheme to connect the Bolton arm of the canal to the
Leeds and Liverpool Canal, the canal remained isolated from any other navigable waterway. One proposed remedy involved the construction of an aqueduct over the River Irwell in Manchester, to connect directly to the Rochdale Canal between
Castlefield and Piccadilly. A bill was proposed in 1799 but after strong objections from the Mersey and Irwell Navigation Company to raise more money. This act, the '''''' (
45 Geo. 3. c. iv), allowed them to raise an additional £80,000. This allowed them to repay the debt, and continue work to finish the canal. An inspection in June 1808 reported that by November 1808 the canal would be complete throughout. A connection to the Rochdale Canal was eventually built in 1839 via the
Manchester and Salford Junction Canal, which was funded in part by the proprietors of the MB&B canal.
Traffic Most of the traffic along the canal transported coal from the many collieries that existed along its length, such as
Outwood Colliery and
Ladyshore Colliery. Some of these pits were linked to the canal by road, and some by short
tramlines. In the late 19th century as much as of coal and of other materials including
night soil and fruit were transported annually. The canal also enabled the transport of
salt from Cheshire to the many
bleach and
dye works in its area – hence the name of Salt Wharf on the Bolton arm of the canal. Tolls were easily calculated as milestones were placed along the towpath at intervals. This was important as journeys were often quite short, the collieries being so close to industry along the canal's length. The boats used to transport coal were short and narrow, and each contained a row of boxes used for carrying coal. Each box had a base of two halves, hinged and held closed with chains. These boxes would be lifted out of the boats, positioned by
crane over a bunker or cart and emptied by releasing the chains on the base. This design helped keep the canal competitive, as it increased the speed with which loading and unloading of the boats could be performed. The canal would often freeze in winter, so an
icebreaker was used to ensure the canal remained navigable during the cold weather. Named "Sarah Lansdale" and owned by James Crompton Paperworks, it was towed by a team of horses while the crew stood astride the deck, secured to the handrails, rocking the boat from side to side and breaking the ice in the process. Often, ice would be encountered that was so thick the boat would rise up onto the surface of the ice. This boat did once reside at the boat museum in
Ellesmere Port Dock The nearby Giant's Seat House was for some time the home of the canal manager. The canal also carried
packet services, with passengers facing a three-hour journey between Bolton and Manchester. The first passenger boat to Bolton was launched in 1796 from the Windsor Castle public house, and in 1798 a new packet boat was built for the use of the company. Fares were initially fixed by the canal company (although from 1805 contracted-out) and based upon the service required; a passenger using the state cabin from Bolton to Manchester would be charged one
shilling six
pence, and a single shilling on the return journey. Another passenger service ran along the two arms from Bolton to Bury, and over 60,000 passengers per year travelled on the canal; between July 1833 and June 1834, 21,060 made the journey from Bolton to Manchester, 21,212 people travelled from Manchester to Bolton, and 20,818 intermediary passengers hopped on and off the boats en route. In 1834 the Bolton to Manchester service earned £1,177 and the Bolton to Bury service earned £75.
Railway proposal In March 1829 the idea of building a branch railway line from the Oldfield Road terminus in Salford to the new
Liverpool and Manchester Railway was mooted, but nothing was built. In 1830 the canal company, led by chairman
Sir John Tobin, began to promote a proposal to build a railway along the line of the canal, from Salford to Bolton. Alexander Nimmo was employed to report on the proposal and told that it was possible "so far as he expressed himself capable of judging from his present cursory view of the canal". The shareholders then sought a bill for a railway from Bolton to Manchester and on 23 August 1831 obtained an act of Parliament, the
Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal and Railway Act 1831 (
1 & 2 Will. 4. c. lx), to become the "Company of Proprietors of the Manchester, Bolton and Bury Canal Navigation and Railway Company". Due mainly to the objections of local mine owners who would have lost access to the canal and supplies, and would not have had branch railways built for them, the company agreed to an amending bill which would keep the canal and allow the new railway to be constructed alongside it. Due to technical and financial constraints the branch to Bury was never built. The canal therefore survived, although locks 4 and 5 in Salford were moved and combined into a two-rise
staircase, with a second tunnel built underneath the line which became known as the
Manchester and Bolton Railway. The line opened on 28 May 1838, and the company had purchased four
locomotives from
Bury, Curtis, and Kennedy, two from
George Forrester and Company, and two from
William Fairbairn & Sons. Between the opening date and 9 January 1839 the railway carried 228,799 passengers – far more than had been carried on the canal. Shortly thereafter passenger services on the canal ceased and the boats were sold off. In 1846 the company was taken over by the
Manchester and Leeds Railway, In 1922 the L&YR amalgamated into the
London and North Western Railway, and in 1923 this company amalgamated into the
London, Midland and Scottish Railway. This company was nationalised in 1948 under the
Transport Act 1947 and became part of
British Railways.
Decline By 1924 the Bolton arm had experienced a significant fall in traffic, although until the 1930s, when colliery closures reduced traffic even further, coal trade remained brisk. On 2 March 1937 the London, Midland and Scottish Railway held a
Special General Meeting during which they proposed to abandon the canal from Clifton Aqueduct to Bailey Bridge, from Bailey Bridge to Bury, and the entire Bolton arm from Nob End Locks to Bolton. The proposal was not carried but four years later, under the London, Midland and Scottish Railway Act of 1941, they abandoned of the canal, including a section from Prestolee to Clifton and the entire Bolton arm. In 1939, during the
Second World War, the
Ministry of Transport ordered a half-mile section in Agecroft piped, to reduce the risk of German bomb damage damaging the adjacent
Magnesium Elektron Company's site. In 1951 total income was £8,815 against a total expenditure of £9,574. In the same year, the canal carried of coal and no other materials. A British Transport Commission report of 1955 included the canal in its list of "Waterways having insufficient commercial prospects to justify their retention for navigation". Following an Act of Parliament, in 1961 the canal was abandoned. A single coal delivery service between Sion Street and Bury Moors continued until 1968, but this was the last commercial traffic to use the canal. == Features ==