When Mary Osborn returned to Europe after years in the US, she was surprised to find that European science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (
STEM fields) had not opened doors to women as she had experienced in America. She was quoted in an article in
Science in 1994 to the effect that women's role in Germany was still "kinder, kuche, kirch" (children, kitchen, church.) In 1992, she had written a protest letter in response to an editorial in
Nature that had claimed child care issues were chiefly responsible for the
leaky pipeline for
women in science, not discrimination. As a woman without children who had experienced no
gender discrimination early in her career but had seen differential treatment of men and women in science later, she did not find this argument convincing, and she was appalled to find out that Europe had collected little or no data on rates of success of women in science. Partly because Osborn objected to this situation, the
European Commission (EC) appointed her co-chair of a working group to investigate the status of European women scientists and scientists in training and in employment and to prepare a report. The outcome was the European Technology Assessment Network (ETAN) Report on Women in Science, published in 2006, which identified a number of reasons why women dropped out of science and served as a blueprint for Europeans who wished to fix this problem. She noted in 2012 that there was still a
leaky pipeline for women scientists in Germany. She has given a great deal of thought to how women are taught to act as they grow up and how that may impact their career decisions. In an interview in 2004, Osborn said, "In deciding whether to accept new challenges a remark by Diane Britten some years ago in
The Times has proved very helpful: "When asked to do something women tend to say `Why me?' Men say `Why not me?' I have learned to say `Why not me?''' Summing up her advice to those in charge of sciences in universities and industry, she said in 2012, "Above all one has to get the argument across that it is wasteful, expensive and unfair to educate and train large numbers of woman scientists and then not use their talents in the job market or provide equal access to the top jobs." == Awards and honors ==