}} }} In his discussion of
L. blakeburnensis taxonomic affinities, Wilson (1977) deemed it a member of the family
Percopsidae along with the fossil
Erismatopterus plus the living
Aphredoderus and
Percopsis. This was based on several skull and skeletal characters including a reduced amount of scales present on the skull, reduced spines on the lachrymal and preopercular bones, and a reduced amount of teeth in the jaw and mouth cavity dentitions. He cited the work of
Colin Patterson and
Donn Eric Rosen, then "in press" and released in 1989, where they state finding no convincing characters to place
Libotonius within the family Percopsidae. The uncertain placement of the genus was maintained by Murrey and Wilson (1999) who agreed with Patterson and Rosens placement of
Libotonius basally as a
Percopsiformes stem group. In Murry and Wilsons phylogenic assessments, they recovered
Libotonius in a
trichotomy with both
Aphredoderidae and
Percopsidae. By 2013, the placement of
Libotonius was again shifting, this time back towards Percopsidae in various chapters of the book
Mesozoic Fishes 5 – Global Diversity and Evolution. In the chapter by W. Calvin Borden, Terry Grande and W. Leo Smith which discusses
Paracanthopterygii caudal fin
osteology Borden
et al justified the placement based on the skeletal similarities between
Libotonius and the other core percopsids. In the phylogeny they produced, based on their interpretation of the evolution of 26 differing skeletal characters,
Libotonius was basal in the Percopsidae, with
Mcconichthys basal to the sister clade that included
Aphredoderus. However in their earlier chapter on the history of Paracanthopterygii and possibilities of molecular phylogenetics, they list the studied specimens of
Libotonius under "Libotoniidae". Three years later Richard Van der Laan's 2016
Family-group names of fossil fishes listed "Libotoniidae" as a
junior synonym of Percopsidae, but did not give a rational or reference for the placement. The 2016
Fishes of the World 5th edition discusses
Libotonius within the paragraph on Percopsidae as a percopsid that is sometimes treated in the separate family "Libotoniidae". The placement in Percopsidae was uncertain in Murray
et al (2020) who presented to cladograms in relation to the placement of the Cretaceous genus
Lindoeichthys from Alberta. In the unconstrained cladogram, the two
Libotonius are successive sister clades to the core Percopsidae within the family, however in the 50% majority rule cladogram, both species are placed just outside the family in polytomy with Percopsidae and
Mcconichthys, Murray
et al treating them as either sisters to the family or included in an expanded clade. ==Description==