The idea of mechanical licenses came about shortly after the turn of the 20th century, with the popularity of
player pianos, with the ability to play songs encoded on a roll of paper. The
sheet music industry then believed that the recreation of their songs was violation of copyright, and initiated legal action that resulted in the
Supreme Court of the United States case,
White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. (209 U.S. 1) in 1908. The Supreme Court ruled that the piano rolls were not copies of the plaintiff's music, but instead part of the machine that created music, and thus player piano and piano roll makers did not have to pay royalties to the sheet music composers. Songwriters lobbied to the
United States Congress following the ruling, and succeeded in establishing the nature of mechanical licenses in the
Copyright Act of 1909. Since then, the nature of copyright law with respect to mechanical licenses have been continually updated to include new types of phonorecords mediums and recordings. For example, in October 2006 the
Register of Copyright ruled that
ring tones are subject to compulsory licensing. The
Music Modernization Act passed in 2018 implemented processes for digital streaming services to pay for the compulsory mechanical license through a new non-profit organization created by the law, known as the
Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC). The Music Modernization Act changes the process of filing Notices of Intent (NOI) to obtain a compulsory license. Whereas a potential licensee intending to make digital reproductions of the work could previously submit a NOI to the copyright office when the name and/or address of the copyright owner could not be found, under the new law, the Copyright Office no longer accepts notices of intention to obtain a mechanical license for digital phonorecord deliveries of a work. The Office continues to accept notices of intention for non-digital phonorecord deliveries (e.g., for CDs, vinyl records, tapes, and other physical media). ==See also==