Frailty is hypothesized to reflect impairments in the regulation of multiple physiologic systems, embodying a lack of resilience to physiologic challenges and thus elevated risk for a range of deleterious endpoints. Generally speaking, the empirical assessment of frailty in individuals seeks ultimately to capture this or related features, though distinct approaches to such assessment have been developed in the literature. Two most widely used approaches, different in their nature and scopes, are the physical frailty phenotype and frailty index/deficit accumulation model.
Physical frailty phenotype A popular approach to the assessment of frailty encompasses the assessment of five dimensions that are hypothesized to reflect systems whose impaired regulation underlies the syndrome. This score is based the presence of deficits in may areas related to frailty, including symptoms of cognitive or physical impairment, laboratory abnormalities, nutritional deficits, or disability. CGAs for older people with frailty who do not live in a long-term care institution could improve
medication adherence, patient functioning, quality of care, and reduce the risk of unplanned hospital admissions. In the United Kingdom,
best practice guidelines recommend a medical review based on CGA to establish the management plan for people with frailty.
Four domains of frailty A model consisting of four domains of frailty uses a conceptualisation that could be viewed as blending the phenotypic and index models. The model was developed from routinely collected hospital data, and was found to have even predictive capability across 3 outcomes of care. In the care home setting, one study indicated that not all four domains of frailty were routinely assessed in residents, giving evidence to suggest that frailty may still primarily be viewed only in terms of physical health.
SHARE Frailty Index The SHARE-Frailty Index (SHARE-FI) assesses frailty based on five domains of the frailty phenotype: • Fatigue • Loss of appetite • Grip strength • Functional difficulties • Physical activity
Clinical Frailty Scale The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a scale used to assess frailty which was evolved from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. It is among the few assessment tools that have demonstrated adaptability for remote use. The CFS is a 9-point scale used to assess a persons frailty level, where a score of 1 point would mean a person is very fit and robust, to a score of 9 points meaning the person is severely frail and terminally ill. It has been assessed to screen all domains of frailty, and is said to be easy to perform by clinicians. Specific tests used in this scaling system are walking tests and clock drawing.
Electronic Frail Scale (eFI) The electronic Frail Scale (eFI) is a scale weighted out of 36 deficit points where the higher the number in the score will represent the more frail, or more prone to frailty. Each frailty-related deficit the person has is given a point and the more deficits the person is experiencing the more likely they are frail or will experience frailty in the future. The total number of deficits is divided by 36. Then, a frailty category is assigned. A person with a score of 0.00–0.12 is in the "Fit" category. A person with a score of 0.13–0.24 is in the "Mild" category. A person with a score of 0.25–0.36 is in the "Moderate" category. Finally, a person with the score of 0.36 or above is considered to be in the "Severe" category.
Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) uses diagnostic codes from the
International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD10). It is calculated by combining a weighted set of 109 ICD10 diagnostic codes recorded in the person's medical record during the current hospital admission and the two previous emergency admissions occurring in the prior two years. Each of the 109 ICD10 codes has an associated weight, from 0.1 up to 7.1. These weights are summed to give the frailty risk score for each person. The resulting HFRS values ranging from 0 (zero frailty risk) for those with none of the 109 codes to 173.2 for someone with all 109 codes. People can be categorised into four groups: zero risk (HRFS=0), lower risk (0 15). Originally the HFRS was developed for people aged 75 years or older but it can be used to identify frailty risk for all adults admitted to hospital.
Assessment for surgical outcomes Frail elderly people are at significant risk of post-surgical complications and the need for extended care. Frailty more than doubles the risk of morbidity and mortality from surgery and cardiovascular conditions. Assessment of older patients before elective surgeries can accurately predict the patients' recovery trajectories. One frailty scale consists of five items: • Congestive heart failure within 1 month of surgery • Diabetes mellitus • Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease or pneumonia in the past • Individuals needing additional assistance to perform everyday activities of living • High blood pressure that is controlled with medication An individual without one of these conditions would be given a score of 0 for the condition absent. An individual who does have one of the conditions would be given a score of 1 for each of the conditions present. In an initial study using the mFI-5 scale, individuals with a sum mFI-5 score of 2 or greater were predicted to experience post-surgery complications due to frailty, which was supported by the results of the study. Other studies note that frailty scales alone may be inaccurate in predicting outcomes for people undergoing surgical procedures, and other factors such as co-morbid medical conditions need to be considered. For people with frailty undergoing
abdominal surgery,
prehabilitation programmes that include exercise, improved diet and psychological support can reduce the
length of hospital stay and decrease the risk of serious complications. == Prevention ==