Alexandra Dumitrescu In 2007, writing for the Australian art journal
Double Dialogues (Issue Seven), in an essay titled "Interconnections in Blakean and Metamodern Space," the New Zealand writer Alexandra Dumitrescu envisaged a "budding cultural paradigm" that "concurred" with postmodernism, and partly "emerged from it and as a reaction to it." Dumitrescu was the earliest theorist to link the term "metamodern" to a paradigm shift. She began using the word "metamodern" as far back as 2001, and developed her thinking in an article about James Joyce in 2005. See, e.g.,
More Deaths than One, a novel that examines the Central Illinois roots of the late
David Foster Wallace and his gradual shift to metamodernism, emphasizing Dumitrescu's role in developing the fundamental concepts of metamodernism. Postmodernism, in Dumitrescu’s analysis in
Double Dialogues, was hapless and dying – especially because of its dependency on fragmentation, individualism, and "the preeminence of analysis over synthesis." She described metamodernism as a continuum of revision and interconnectedness: "a boat being built or repaired as it sails, or a palace under continuous construction."
Vermeulen and van den Akker Cultural theorists Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den Akker published their essay "Notes on Metamodernism" in 2010 and ran an online research blog with the same name from 2009 to 2016. Their work is often considered an attempt to explain
post-postmodernism. According to them, the metamodern sensibility "can be conceived of as a kind of informed naivety, a pragmatic idealism" characteristic of cultural responses to recent global events such as
climate change, the
2008 financial crisis, political instability, and the
digital revolution. They asserted that "the postmodern culture of relativism, irony, and pastiche" is over, having been replaced by a sensibility that stresses engagement, affect, and storytelling through "ironic sincerity". The return of a
Romantic sensibility has been posited as a key characteristic of metamodernism, observed by Vermeulen and van den Akker in the architecture of
Herzog & de Meuron, and the work of artists such as
Bas Jan Ader,
Peter Doig,
Olafur Eliasson,
Kaye Donachie,
Charles Avery, and
Ragnar Kjartansson. They claim that the
neo-romantic approach to metamodernism is done in the spirit of resignifying "the commonplace with significance, the ordinary with mystery, the familiar with the seemliness of the unfamiliar, and the finite with the semblance of the infinite". By doing so, these artists seek to "perceive anew a future that was lost from sight". Vermeulen asserted that "metamodernism is not so much a philosophy — which implies a closed ontology — as it is an attempt at a vernacular [or] a sort of open source document, that might contextualise and explain what is going on around us, in political economy as much as in the arts". They asserted that the 2000s were marked by a return to typically modern positions, while still retaining the postmodern sensibilities of the 1980s and 1990s. The manifesto recognized "oscillation to be the natural order of the world", and called for an end to "the inertia resulting from a century of modernist ideological naivety and the cynical insincerity of its antonymous bastard child". Instead, Turner proposed metamodernism as "the mercurial condition between and beyond irony and sincerity, naivety and knowingness, relativism and truth, optimism and doubt, in pursuit of a plurality of disparate and elusive horizons", and concluded with a call to "go forth and oscillate!" with the trio embarking on a series of metamodern performance projects exploring connection, empathy, and community across digital and physical platforms.
Hanzi Freinacht Hanzi Freinacht is the pen-name used by author Emil Ejner Friis and sociologist
Daniel Görtz who published
The Listening Society: A Metamodern Guide to Politics in 2017. Written as a philosopher and
polemic, Freinacht plays into common metamodern themes like informed-naivete and ironic-sincerity vis-à-vis his performance as an author. Freinacht centrally argues that metamodernism is the natural successor of postmodernism and earlier developmental stages in history, advocating for stage theories as a valid way to understand metamodern phenomena. In
The Listening Society, Freinacht attempts to describe how relationships between
memetics (or units of culture),
epistemology, and
developmental psychology are integral to
comparative politics and a metamodern lifestyle in general. The book seeks to broadly and systematically describe the world under the framing of "symbolic development", arguing that societies can most effectively address their issues through better understanding how developed its people and places are. To this end, Freinacht conceptualizes development by showing how inner-personal growth and trends follow patterns that can be found in relation to stages of increasing
complexity (notably building upon Michael Commons'
Model of Hierarchical Complexity). Görtz summarizes this concept of "stages" in his own name in the collective anthology:
Metamodernity: Dispatches from a Time Between Worlds:"It is a tenet of metamodern sociology that perspectives are not arbitrarily ordered, but that they emerge in recognisable patterns... These sequences are, in turn, always dependent upon social and material – ultimately, even biological – conditions, with which they interact. Postmodernism did not emerge before modernism, nor
could it have. For this reason, metamodern sociology always looks for meaningful explanatory developmental sequences, putting them in relation to one another on some kind of developmental scale. This developmentalism thus accepts at least some minimal form of stage theories... Each stage must be, in clearly definable terms, either
more complex than the former, or, at a minimum, be derived from the former and qualitatively distinct."In terms of political ideology, Freinacht advocates for government policy that emphasizes
environmental sustainability,
economic liberalism, and strong
social programs, which can be found in his second book:
Nordic Ideology (2019).
Jason Ānanda Josephson Storm In 2021, American academic
Jason Josephson Storm published
Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. In the book, Storm argues for a metamodern method of scholarly research in the
social sciences and
humanities which requires a "revaluation of values" and a new analytic process. He incorporates
Hegelian dialectics to negate what he argues are reflective negatives in postmodern thought, including general skepticism,
antirealism,
ethical nihilism, and the
linguistic turn. Notable concepts detailed by Storm in the book include his proposition of metarealism, "process social ontology", and "
hylosemiotics" (see:
process philosophy and
semiotics). Storm describes metamodernism in brief as follows:"Metamodernism is what we get when we take the strategies associated with postmodernism and productively reduplicate and turn them in on themselves. This will entail disturbing the symbolic system of poststructuralism, producing a genealogy of genealogies, deconstructing deconstruction, and providing a therapy for therapeutic philosophy."In 2024, Storm also launched the academic journal:
Metamodern Theory and Praxis as Chair of the Science and Technology Studies department at
Williams College. Storm asserts that self-analytical, "anti-disciplinary" thought is needed to effectively engage metamodern ideas in the real world and has stated his work is more about creating a paradigm shift than describing an intellectual movement.
Brendan Graham Dempsey In 2023, Dempsey wrote
Metamodernism: Or, The Cultural Logic of Cultural Logics, in which he attempted to synthesize the various strands of metamodern discourse to date (e.g., Vermeulen, Storm, Freinacht, etc.) into a single coherent framework based on the idea of "meta" as "recursive reflection". For Dempsey, what all forms of metamodernism have in common is the attempt to move
beyond postmodernism
by means of postmodernism—a move which requires progressively "decentering" from the postmodern vantage in order to reflect on it as an object of analysis (i.e., "going meta" on postmodernism). This reflective move creates a new orientation that is able to critique the previous perspective from a higher vantage. However, since this is also the process by which postmodernism distinguished itself from its modernist predecessor, such a dynamic can be seen as an enduring throughline in the development of all cultural logics. As he puts it:"The claim I'd like to make is that cultural shifts—like those from modernism to postmodernism to metamodernism—reflect society-level manifestations of such recursive, self-reflective moves. Postmodernists come after, objectify, reflect upon, critique, and transcend modernism; metamodernists come after, objectify, reflect upon, critique, and transcend postmodernism; and so on. As they do, genuinely
novel insights and sensibilities are generated that justify speaking in terms of distinct cultural phases."Dempsey sees this "recursive transcendence through iterative self-reflection" operating (implicitly or explicitly) as part of all contemporary articulations of metamodernism. Consequently, he posits that such a "logic" to the unfolding of cultural logics is itself a defining feature of the emerging metamodern worldview: "In sum, what 'metamodernism' speaks to, I am suggesting, is 1) the cultural moment when the deep recursive process of iterative self-reflection is applied to postmodernism, and thus constitutes an advance
beyond the postmodern that
includes many of its strategies. In the process, metamodernism becomes 2) the cultural moment when this deep recursive process in cultural shifts becomes an explicit object of reflection and the basis of a new way of seeing. Metamodernism thus becomes a cultural logic
about (meta) cultural logics. Thus, with the awareness of the full implications of 'going meta' in eternal recursive reflection, metamodernism entails the necessary inclusion within it of
all prior cultural logics (at least insofar as it contains representations of their information in its complexity from a higher vantage). In this way, metamodernism signals an inherently multi-perspectival perspective, one that recognizes its inherent ability to toggle in and out of its own recursive contents." He links this to "metamodernism", as aligning with a new way to view reality. == Examples of metamodernism in the arts and culture ==