Micarea was
circumscribed by
Elias Magnus Fries in his 1825 work
Systema Orbis Vegetabilis. In his , Fries characterised the genus by an effuse, crust-like
thallus made up of aggregated gelatinous , together with free, almost spherical
apothecia that are "always open" and lack a distinct margin. He recorded it from rocks and especially damp wood, and remarked that sterile material of
Micarea prasina (the
type species) could be difficult to tell apart from
algae-like crusts recognised at the time. There have been some
taxonomic disputes about the genus. Early molecular studies suggested that
Micarea as traditionally circumscribed did not always form a single evolutionary lineage, because some analyses placed other ectolechiaceous genera within
Micarea when only one or a few gene regions were sampled. A large, five–locus phylogeny published in 2026 (based on worldwide sampling of 314 specimens representing 102 species) recovered
Micarea in a broad sense as a single, moderately to strongly supported
clade when some lineages historically treated as separate genera were included. In that analysis,
Micarea formed the
sister lineage to a predominantly tropical,
foliicolous (leaf-dwelling) clade ("Ectolechiaceae
sensu stricto") that includes genera such as
Byssoloma,
Calopadia,
Fellhanera,
Lasioloma and
Sporopodium, although support for this relationship varied among analyses. On a classificatory level, that study favoured a middle-ground ("mesogeneric") solution rather than splitting the phylogeny into many small genera. It treated the earliest-diverging lineage (centred on
Micarea crassipes and allies) as the separate genus
Helocarpon, and retained the remaining clades in
Micarea. It also reduced
Szczawinskia to synonymy with
Micarea (with
new combinations for its species) and treated
Uluguria as a synonym as well. The authors also discussed two small, potentially related genera. In their expanded sampling,
Fellhaneropsis (including the type,
F. myrtillicola) fell within the broader
Micarea clade, but its placement and status were treated as unresolved because of missing data and limited sampling. Separate gene-tree analyses also suggested that
Micareopsis irriguata may belong within the
Micarea melanoprasina lineage, although this placement was treated as provisional pending additional data. The 2026 phylogeny also recovered multiple strongly supported infrageneric clades that often correlate with combinations of
thallus structure, ascospore and
conidial morphology, and pigment or secondary-chemistry profiles. The core
M. prasina group (the clade containing the type species) is largely characterised by -based thalli and by the restricted occurrence of
micareic acid,
methoxymicareic acid, and
prasinic acid, whereas many of the more
basal lineages lack detectable
lichen substances and include a wider mix of thallus forms and types.
Classification The
familial placement of
Micarea has changed as classification systems have been revised. In morphology-based schemes the genus was long treated as the type of the family Micareaceae.
Molecular phylogenetic work then showed that the "core"
Micarea lineage is closely allied to, and in single-
locus analyses can intergrade with, a predominantly tropical group of foliicolous lichens that had often been treated as the separate family Pilocarpaceae; this led to proposals to merge Micareaceae into that broader family concept. Under current nomenclature, Pilocarpaceae is treated as an illegitimate name and Ectolechiaceae as the correct family name for this group, while Byssolomataceae (used in some databases) is treated as a later
synonym. The 2026 multilocus revision adopted Ectolechiaceae for
Micarea and recovered the genus as the sister lineage to a mainly foliicolous clade ("Ectolechiaceae
sensu stricto") containing genera such as
Byssoloma and
Calopadia. ==Description==