Microcosm was well received by the reading public upon its release. Apart from the original English the book was also published in the
Polish, German,
Czech and Italian languages. The majority of reviewers were very positive about the book. Writing in the "English Historical Review",
Richard Butterwick wrote that: "Davies and Moorhouse set out to present the history of the city, a microcosm of Central Europe, as evenhandedly as possible, freeing it from the straitjackets of German and Polish nationalisms, and giving due weight to its Jewish and Czech components." He added that "Microcosm must be acclaimed as exemplary." In the Spectator, meanwhile,
Antony Beevor noted the book's "scholarship and objectivity," adding that it "also makes a fascinating story." C.J. Schüler called the book "an impressive and timely history of one of the continent's great cities". Winfried Irgang, deputy director of the Herder Institute Marburg, criticized the book for a number of technical defects and even factual errors, especially in the sections about Middle Ages and the Habsburg era. Irgang moreover states that Davies is unfamiliar with the subject. Historian
Peter Oliver Loew, scientific Vice-director of the
Deutsches Polen-Institut (German Poland Institute), stated that the authors are unfamiliar with the subject and have a tendency to overemphasize the multicultural aspect of the city in order to please the city council, the sponsor of the book. To Loew the work is "largely worthless as a scholarly source". Hubert Zawadzki, writing in the
Slavonic and Eastern European Review wrote that the book has "something of an epic quality", and that it manages to go beyond traditional German versus Polish rivalry in the historiography concerning the city. Furthermore Zawadzki praised the work for containing material of interest both for the specialist historians as well as the lay reader. Historian
Adam Zamoyski also praised the work as remaining "above the national squabbles" and compared Davies and Moorhouse favorably to
Fernand Braudel, one of the greatest of the modern historians. David Isaacson, in a review for
The Telegraph stated that the book makes an "excellent contribution" to international understanding. ==See also==