Philosophers tend to believe that to punish and to take revenge are vastly different activities: "One who undertakes to punish rationally does not do so for the sake of the wrongdoing, which is now in the past - but for the sake of the future, that the wrongdoing shall not be repeated, either by him, or by others who see him, or by others who see him punished". In contrast, seeking revenge is motivated by a yearning to see a transgressor suffer; revenge is necessarily preceded by anger, whereas punishment does not have to be. Indeed, Kaiser, Vick, and Major point out the following: "An important psychological implication of the various efforts to define revenge is that there is no objective standard for declaring an act to be motivated by revenge or not. Revenge is a label that is ascribed based on perceivers’ attributions for the act. Revenge is an inference, regardless of whether the individuals making the inference are the harmdoers themselves, the injured parties, or outsiders. Because revenge is an inference, various individuals can disagree on whether the same action is revenge or not." A growing body of research reveals that a vengeful
disposition is correlated to adverse health outcomes: strong desires for revenge and greater willingness to act on these desires have been correlated with
post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms and psychiatric morbidity. James Kimmel, Jr., a lecturer in psychiatry at the
Yale School of Medicine and founder of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies, has argued that revenge operates as a behavioral
addiction, with neuroimaging studies showing that revenge desires activate the same neural pleasure and reward circuitry associated with
substance use disorders. According to this model, revenge cravings can become compulsive and uncontrollable despite negative consequences, paralleling the progression from casual drug use to addiction. ==Proverbs==